Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 11:26 AM Oct 2012

PPP: Missouri's DEM Governor is WAY ahead. Does this bode well for Obama and McCaskill?

-PPP's newest poll of the race for Governor in Missouri finds Democratic incumbent Jay Nixon cruising to reelection. He leads by 19 points with 54% to 35% for Republican challenger Dave Spence. This is the biggest lead PPP has found for Nixon since January.

Nixon continues to be one of the more popular Governors in the country.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/10/nixon-cruising-to-reelection.html

In this election coattails are pretty important, especially if we are going to keep the Senate. Missouri has gone from red to pink on many election maps and now McCaskill has been pulling ahead as well.

If the Dem governor and the Dem Senator are ahead, I personally think it will be nearly impossible for Obama to not win Missouri.

It might not be showing up on the polls but I think Missouri is much more likely a toss-up state and when you figure in the minority voters (who don't often get polled as "likely voters&quot , I think it might be a pale pale pale blue. I think Missouri is going to go for Obama.

In this case the coattails might be from Governor Nixon, or McCaskill (or from a dislike of Akin) but I think Obama will pick up a lot of those Nixon and McCaskill voters.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
4. Actually, the driving force helping Obama in this state is McCaskill's campaign,
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 12:40 PM
Oct 2012

Nixon was always a shoo-in for reelection. He's a blue dog, ineffective Democratic governor at best, bending over backwards to please even the most rabid right wing yahoos of the state.

The campaign that has done the most to make Obama a viable candidate in this state is McCaskill's campaign. It has energized Democrats and liberals in this state, and has insured a high turnout for them. Since the Akin debacle, and the rise of McCaskill, Obama has gone up slowly but steadily. From being ten points back, he has now gone to three points back. Obama could even win this state, but the national party needs to drop a couple of million into this state for that to happen, something which I doubt they're going to do.

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
5. How are McCaskill's coattails? It is a close race and that brings out the base
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 01:19 PM
Oct 2012

But I'm thinking those independents who don't like Akin will be more inclined to vote this time around too.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
8. Hound. McCaskill is a blue-dog also.
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:41 PM
Oct 2012

Does supporting her mean that we have finally pulled you over to the darkside? Kidding aside, your tone is just right on this, I would rather take a bowling ball up side the head than see Akin get elected. If McCaskill can help Obama take the Show Me state, more power to her. BTW, you my call me a blue-dog, but I am really a moderate-progressive, I just like Drones. My social views and behavior are decidedly progressive.

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
9. I'm OK with blue dogs... city dogs and country dogs don't always have the same issues
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 06:03 PM
Oct 2012

but, like you, I am very progressive socially.

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
10. And Nixon's republican opponent is not running much of a campaign
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 06:08 PM
Oct 2012

I've seen a few ads here in KC but zero yard signs. He doesn't appear to be working too hard to win the election.

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
11. Dem Gov, Dem Sen and Obama lost by 2600 votes...why is that state considered so red?
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 06:12 PM
Oct 2012

I've never understood why a state that is really a tossup always is considered red.

pstokely

(10,528 posts)
14. It's not solid Red, it splits the ticket at the statewide level, but its solid Red outside KC andSTL
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 12:27 AM
Oct 2012

nt

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
7. The Prize is 60 in the Senate, one in the White House... at least here in the optimist club :0)
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:30 PM
Oct 2012

Oh, and did I mention Bachmann, West, Walsh, King, Cantor and a few more "safe" seats are looking mightly toss-uppy these days. We have a good chance of taking the house.

pstokely

(10,528 posts)
12. Nixon hasn't been seen with either
Mon Oct 8, 2012, 12:23 AM
Oct 2012

and Missouri doesn't have enough electoral votes to decide the election

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»PPP: Missouri's DEM Gover...