Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
...And This Doesn't Even Include the Japanese Tsunami Debris (Original Post) Redlo Nosrep Oct 2012 OP
the glass bottles end up on glass beaches n/t NMDemDist2 Oct 2012 #1
They didn't do juicy juice boxes hollysmom Oct 2012 #2
The apple core becomes usable food the instant it's tossed into the ocean. Speck Tater Oct 2012 #3
Thanks Redlo Nosrep Oct 2012 #4
Jumping in to agree with you both! JNelson6563 Oct 2012 #5

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
2. They didn't do juicy juice boxes
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 05:52 PM
Oct 2012

But since they are layered with different materials including metal and plastic, they last as long as disposable diapers.

I saw a show once where they recycled disposable diapers by peeling the layers apart and recycling the parts separately, must be a really disgusting job though.

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
3. The apple core becomes usable food the instant it's tossed into the ocean.
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 06:14 PM
Oct 2012

So it doesn't really matter that an apple core is dropped overboard any more than it matters when a comparable size chunk of seaweed dies and drops to the ocean floor. It's natural organic material, not pollution. Everything else on the list is, of course, litter.

However, not all litter is polluting. The glass bottle is no different from a silica-containing rock. It does not pollute. The plywood is no worse than a natural tree branch that falls over an ocean cliff into the sea. Paper and cardboard are likewise pretty innocuous. Tin cans and aluminum cans sink to the bottom and are buried under sediment and disappear in a non-polluting way. We sink whole battle ships to make reefs for the benefit of the fish after all. All that steel and aluminum doesn't pollute anything.

Plastic is the real problem. It decomposes to toxic substances and breaks down into tiny pieces that contaminate the food chain.

Now if we dropped our plastic garbage into a subduction trench it would be sucked into the mantel, melted, and recycled as its constituent elements. That would be the ultimate planetary pollution-free garbage disposal. We would just need to insure that the garbage made it all the way to the very bottom of the trench.

Redlo Nosrep

(111 posts)
4. Thanks
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 06:42 PM
Oct 2012

Your post made me feel hopeful. I've been into choosing biodegradable for many substances I use on the trail and in everyday life for decades, and I always smile when I toss an apple core into the brush, thinking about the birds, squirrels, and bugs enjoying the feast and converting my "garbage" into food.

Not so the plastics, as you pointed out:



http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/oceans/pollution/trash-vortex/

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
5. Jumping in to agree with you both!
Sun Oct 7, 2012, 06:54 PM
Oct 2012

And it is staggering to consider just how much plastic there is out there. It seems almost everything is made of it!

Julie

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»...And This Doesn't Even ...