General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS urges immunity from rape accuser's lawsuit
By Jonathan Stempel
JANUARY 15, 20216:10 PMUPDATED 15 HOURS AGO
The U.S. government on Friday said President Donald Trump should not be forced to defend against a defamation lawsuit by the author E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of raping her a quarter-century ago, and that it should be substituted as the defendant.
In a filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan, the Department of Justice said Trump qualified as a typical employee of the government entitled to immunity under federal law from Carrolls claims, and was also shielded because he spoke about her in his capacity as president.
The law provides a broad grant of immunity to Trump, the Justice Department said, echoing arguments the president has made in other litigation.
Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist, sued Trump in November 2019 after he denied having raped her in a Manhattan department store in mid-1990s ...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-defamation-lawsuit/us-urges-immunity-for-trump-from-rape-accusers-lawsuit-idUSKBN29K2QY
bullimiami
(13,096 posts)soothsayer
(38,601 posts)servermsh
(913 posts)Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)It's blatantly obvious, to even the most unintelligent of repug.
Deacon Blue
(252 posts)...but he loves to twist the law with pretzel 🥨 logic. And yes, this feckless argument has already been slapped down in the trial court. This an interlocutory appeal, I suppose, and the government may have been up against a deadline. Somehow I think Garlands DOJ will not be interested in advancing this frivolity...