General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"QAnon Shaman" Argues He Was Only at the Capitol Riot Because Trump's Tweets Were an "Invitation"
The man who showed up to the attack on the U.S. Capitol in facepaint and a furry, horned headdress is arguing in court that he and the other rioters did no wrong because they were simply acting on an implied invitation from Donald Trump.
Jacob A. Chansley, aka Jake Angeli, aka the QAnon Shaman, is being represented by Al Watkins, the same lawyer who represented the McCloskeys, the St. Louis couple who pointed their guns at protesters last summer because even this stupid, terrible timeline has given up on trying to be original.
Watkins is seeking a pardon for Chansley from Donald Trump in his final days in office. After all, it was Trumps words that brought Chansley to D.C., Watkins arguesthe constant attacks on Mike Pence and Congress and state leaders across the country, and the constant declarations that people like Chansley needed to fight to keep Democrats from stealing the election. If Watkins was just listening to Trump, then Trump should pardon him, right?
The words and invitation of a president are supposed to mean something, Watkins said. Given the peaceful and compliant fashion in which Mr. Chansley comported himself, it would be appropriate and honorable for the president to pardon Mr. Chansley and other like-minded, peaceful individuals who accepted the presidents invitation with honorable intentions.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/that-%e2%80%9cqanon-shaman%e2%80%9d-argues-he-was-only-at-the-capitol-riot-because-donald-trumps-tweets-were-an-%e2%80%9cinvitation%e2%80%9d/ar-BB1cNbe4?li=BBnbfcL
Not sure Trump can pardon him if his actions were what led to Trump's impeachment. None the less it Trump's invite does not excuse the rioters' behavior.
Me.
(35,454 posts)if a criminal invites you to join him/her in crine, you are an accomplice and responsible/guilty for your actions. Own it.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Irish_Dem
(47,128 posts)That doesn't sound right.
A sitting US president organizes a militia to overturn the election he lost.
He then gets impeached for this sedition but at the same time he can pardon the militia members?
Doesn't seem right to me and I seriously doubt our founding fathers had this in mind with the pardon power.
MiniMe
(21,717 posts)That is Nancy's domain.