General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan someone explain what kind of negotiations went on between...
... Schumer and McConnell about the rules for the senate? What kind of leverage did each side have?????
tia
las
turtleblossom
(504 posts)getagrip_already
(14,764 posts)mitch knew it. If mitch pushed iit, the dems would have voted in unison to get control. That is mitch's worst nightmare.
He caved.
just mho of course.
servermsh
(913 posts)Assuming Schumer lined up all 50 Democratic Senators to use the nuclear option on the organizing resolution, then that is the leverage Schumer would have. Otherwise most of the leverage was on Mitch's side.
Perhaps Mitch was just pushing for a Democratic Senator or two to publicly say they wouldn't kill the filibuster. If that is all he wanted, he got it.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)On Friday, Manchin said he supported the filibuster but also supported Schumer's stance not to put anything about filibusters in the agreement. Today Manchin reiterated his filibuster support in a public statement and that he would never change his mind. I suspect that he privately told McConnell that he would change his mind if McConnell continued to be a PITA.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)McConnell has the baseline agreement from the last time the Senate was evenly split... along with knowing that Schumer wants to be able to operate the Senate without the VP having to be in the building every day.
Bev54
(10,053 posts)other than to say they would use the same rules as last time. McConnell just thinks he has something to negotiate and he did not and had to cave.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)McConnell caved because Schumer and the Democrats could have imposed any rules they wanted and McConnell thinks he can get a better deal if he doesn't fight to the end when he can't ultimately win. Sometimes you get a better deal when you surrender.