General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Senate Has Used the Filibuster to Block Civil Rights Bills for Decades....Ditch It.
Seems like we can be our own worst enemy.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/01/the-senate-has-used-the-filibuster-to-block-civil-rights-bills-for-decades-thats-another-reason-for-dems-to-ditch-it/
2 hours ago
The Senate Has Used the Filibuster to Block Civil Rights Bills for Decades. Thats Another Reason for Dems to Ditch It.
If Democrats want to get anything done, theyll have to get rid of this Jim Crow relic first
Kara Voght, ReporterBio
snip//
On matters of democracy reform, protecting the filibuster allows Republicans to hold onto their grasp of political power by blocking likely Democratic voters. Passing Merkleys bill and the Houses voting rights bill, another top Democratic priority, would safeguard rights for the historically disenfranchisedmost notably, Black Americans. In statehouses where Republicans retain control, lawmakers are already busy crafting tightened voting restrictions to dampen the chance Democratic candidates could succeed in future elections. Merkley says his Republican colleagues have told him McConnell has forbidden GOP senators from backing his bill.
Thats why Merkley sees ending the modern-day filibuster and his partys proposed democracy reforms as two sides of the same coin. You have this incredibly racist history of voter suppression, systemic discrimination, he says, and you have the filibuster deeply associated with systemic racism, as well. Passing those bills would rectify this tilt of power toward predominantly white conservatives in our system, adds Adam Jentleson, who worked as an aide to former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and recently published a book calling for filibuster reform. The sequencing is important because you cant do any of the other things unless you do filibuster reform.
To Jentleson, the fate of the filibuster is a matter of political survival for Democrats, too. From his perch in Reids office, he had a front-row seat to the ways McConnell thwarted Obamas agenda, then turned around and blamed Democrats for inaction. The tactic cost Democrats seats in both chambers of Congress over those election cycles. Jentleson says theres tremendous political risk in getting strung along by Republican lawmakers only to end up with small-ball deals that fail to meet the countrys dire moment. Bipartisanship is a worthy goal, Jentleson tells me, but delivering results to save this country has to be the ultimate goal.
So how do Merkley and his fellow filibuster detractors prevail with their colleagues who still resist filibuster reform? The path, Merkley says, is probably to get caught trying to get 60 votes on top agenda items, then watch Republicans block them. If Bidens coronavirus package fails, Merkley predicts, it will move peoples hearts to not allow McConnell a veto that may cost tens or thousands or 100,000 people in this country their lives. The same goes for his partys democracy reform bill. If it comes down to an issue as fundamental as the right to vote and Republicans block it, Merkley says, I think that would have a significant impact as well.
That impact would have to be significant. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.), who told the Hill last summer he was intrigued by Merkleys pitch on filibuster reform, remains opposed to ending the practice. So too, does Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), whose spokesperson told the Washington Post this week that the senator is not only against eliminating the filibuster, but also not open to changing her mind on the matter. Optimists on the side of filibuster reform hope the moderate Democrats might be open to less extreme reforms than total abolition. One picking up steam is something Sen. Bernie Sanders floated during his presidential campaign: Expanding whats allowed under budget reconciliation by overriding guidance from the Senate parliamentarian.
In the progressive imagination, abolishing the filibuster crosses a threshold toward more ambitious structural reforms. For the partys left flank, the proposed democracy and voting rights bills are the baseline. Granting statehood for Washington, DC, abolishing the electoral college, expanding the numbers of seats on the Supreme Court, and enacting a ranked-choice voting system would be necessary steps to rebalance the scales against the tyranny of minority rule. Legislation has been introduced to address each impediment, but not all Democrats are on board with big moves. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) recently told the Atlantic that the votes for DC or Puerto Rico statehood arent there, even if the filibuster is abolished (even though the House passed a bill to grant DC statehood last year). For now, Democrats debate on the future of the filibuster delays facing up to the divisions that remain within their caucus.
vishnura
(247 posts)Demsrule86
(68,595 posts)Johnny2X2X
(19,069 posts)But we don't have the votes to do so.
What we can hope for is that Schumer and Nancy put some stuff in bills that Manchin and Sinema really really like for their states and the GOP kills them with the fillibuster. Maybe that can change their minds.
Right now, the fillibuster is staying and that has nothing to do with Reps. Hopefully Schumer got Mitch to agree to some limits on it.
Demsrule86
(68,595 posts)end the filibuster.We need to stop demanding things for which we don't have the votes for and pass the legislation we can. This now hangs over Mitch`s head. And we dont want to force moderates to take votes that cost them their seats. We lose the majority and it is game over.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)HariSeldon
(455 posts)There are six senators, including Mitch McConnell, Susan Collins, and Rand Paul whose replacements, if they are hounded from office, would be named by Democratic governors (without any requirement the replacement be a Republican). Being Republican politicians, there is every chance in the world they and the other Republican senators are dirty in one or more ways; find the crimes and use them as leverage to get the Republicans to vote for abolishing the filibuster.
ariadne0614
(1,730 posts)Just wondering.
brooklynite
(94,604 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 26, 2021, 11:10 AM - Edit history (1)
I support eliminating the filibuster, because in this politicized world, nothing gets accomplished. But I'm thoughtful enough to realize and accept the implications WHEN the Republicans regain power in the Senate.
TwilightZone
(25,472 posts)I suspect that's not what you meant to say. I think it's more likely they would overtly try to gut civil rights, but they pretty much already do that.
dsc
(52,163 posts)Every other single democracy on the planet operates such that the majority government gets the policies it wants to see enacted, enacted. It makes voting useless since we never get the policies for which we vote. We still haven't passed any civil rights legislation at all on behalf of LGBT citizens despite having majority support for such legislation for well over a decade. And there is literally no hope at all that such legislation will pass for at least the next decade. The Voting rights act is dead and GOP legislatures in the South are about to ban Blacks from voting at all. So just how much worse can it be?