Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEJ Dionne: Democrats are faced with a choice. Protect the filibuster or protect democracy.
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
Norman Ornstein
@NormOrnstein
A must read from @EJDionne .
Democrats are faced with a choice. Protect the filibuster or protect democracy.
Opinion | Democrats are faced with a choice. Protect the filibuster or protect democracy.
Theres no chance of compromise with this Republican Party.
washingtonpost.com
10:14 AM · Jan 31, 2021
Norman Ornstein
@NormOrnstein
A must read from @EJDionne .
Democrats are faced with a choice. Protect the filibuster or protect democracy.
Opinion | Democrats are faced with a choice. Protect the filibuster or protect democracy.
Theres no chance of compromise with this Republican Party.
washingtonpost.com
10:14 AM · Jan 31, 2021
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-democrats-choice-protect-the-filibuster-or-protect-democracy/2021/01/29/0e78ba24-6278-11eb-afbe-9a11a127d146_story.html
The Democrats can use their House and Senate majorities to reform our politics, guarantee voting rights and enhance our democracy. Or they can surrender to an anti-majoritarian, money-dominated system, and allow the more accessible approach to voting created during the coronavirus pandemic to be destroyed.
This means that the party must recognize that the Senate filibuster, contrary to happy myth, does not promote bipartisanship or constructive compromise by requiring most bills to get 60 votes. No, in the face of a radicalized Republican Party, maintaining the current filibuster rules means abandoning any aspirations to a legacy of genuine achievement.
Sorry, there is no third way here. Yes, Democrats could avoid a complete repeal of the filibuster by getting rid of it only for certain categories of bills for example, those related to voting rights and democratic reforms. But living with the status quo means capitulating to obstruction. Democrats have only 50 votes plus Vice President Harriss tie-breaker. They will never get 10 votes from a GOP that cant even find a way to exile white-supremacist extremists from its ranks.
So let the inevitable battle be waged in the memory of John Lewis and John McCain, the civil rights icon and the Teddy Roosevelt reformer. Let it be a fight for democracy itself.
There is genuine urgency because Republican legislators throughout the country have been moving rapidly to rig the 2022 elections by throwing new obstacles in the way of voters.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 669 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EJ Dionne: Democrats are faced with a choice. Protect the filibuster or protect democracy. (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jan 2021
OP
The filibuster was born to protect slave states, just like the EC. Time for it to go.
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2021
#1
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,467 posts)1. The filibuster was born to protect slave states, just like the EC. Time for it to go.
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)2. Whether it goes or not, HR1 and the VRA must be passed at all costs.
Obviously the Covid Relief package is the top priority, but I would place those bills above anything else.
That said, I do agree that now is the time to kill the filibuster. I have heard Norm Ornstein on a number of podcasts in the last couple of weeks he has suggested a number of rule changes around Budget Reconciliation that may do similar things but still have the cover of keeping the filibuster.
theaocp
(4,245 posts)3. Keep campaigning on what can be born of this in WV, AZ, and
Any other damn state that has senators who need some influencing. Take it to the voters and fucking tell them Santas coming to town, so go tell your senators to get in line and let the donors cry.