Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(43,497 posts)
Wed Feb 3, 2021, 02:01 AM Feb 2021

San Francisco's move to rename schools will provide invaluable ammunition to Fox News.



The Five-Second Cancellation of Abraham Lincoln

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/02/san-francisco-renaming-spree/617894/



San Francisco has issued its latest grand moral decree, and bad ex-presidents would be quaking in their coffins—if they could stop laughing. On January 26, the San Francisco school board announced that dozens of public schools must be renamed. The figures that do not meet the board’s standards include Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, John Muir, Robert Louis Stevenson, Paul Revere, and Dianne Feinstein. A panel had determined that the 44 schools—more than one-third of the city’s total—were named after figures guilty of being, variously, colonizers; slave owners; exploiters of workers; oppressors of women, children, or queer and transgender people; people connected to human rights or environmental abuses; and espousers of racist beliefs. This holier-than-thou crusade is typical for San Francisco, which in recent years has traded in its Freak Flag to march under the banner of brain-dead political correctness. Aside from providing invaluable ammunition to Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and the more than 70 million Trump supporters whose most extreme caricatures of liberals have now been confirmed, renaming the schools is likely to cost the already deeply indebted district millions of dollars, and will not help a single disadvantaged student or actually advance the cause of racial justice.

The nation’s reckoning about its racist past might have positive aspects, but exercises in Maoist “constructive self-criticism” are not among them. The School Names Advisory Committee was created in 2018 by the San Francisco Board of Education. Although the committee of community members and school-board staff was supposed to “engage the larger San Francisco community in a sustained discussion regarding public school names,” no such engagement ever took place. The “blue-ribbon panel” did its own “research” (using that term lightly) and issued its own rulings. In keeping with the incorruptible, Robespierre-like spirit of our revolutionary times, the committee decreed that one sin (being a colonizer or slave owner, using an “inappropriate” word, and so on) was all that was required to send a figure to the guillotine. Once that decision was made, the severed heads rolled into the gutter of history. Since Washington was a slave owner and, in the words of the committee, “the majority of [Lincoln’s] policies proved detrimental” to native peoples, the leader who won America’s war of independence and the one who saved the union and issued the Emancipation Proclamation were dispatched without further discussion. The decision to rename Abraham Lincoln High took five seconds; George Washington took 12.

The decision process was a joke. The committee’s research seems to have consisted mostly of cursory Google searches, and the sources cited were primarily Wikipedia entries or similar. Historians were not consulted. Embarrassing errors of interpretation were made, as well as rudimentary factual errors. Robert Louis Stevenson, perhaps the most beloved literary figure in the city’s history, was cancelled because in a poem titled “Foreign Children” in his famous collection A Child’s Garden of Verses, he used the rhyming word Japanee for Japanese. Paul Revere Elementary School ended up on the renaming list because, during the discussion, a committee member misread a History.com article as claiming that Revere had taken part in an expedition that stole the lands of the Penobscot Indians. In fact, the article described Revere’s role in the Penobscot Expedition, a disastrous American military campaign against the British during the Revolutionary War. (That expedition was named after a bay in Maine.) But no one bothered to check, the committee voted to rename the school, and by order of the San Francisco school board Paul Revere will now ride into oblivion. The committee also failed to consistently apply its one-strike-and-you’re-out rule. When one member questioned whether Malcolm X Academy should be renamed in light of the fact that Malcolm was once a pimp, and therefore subjugated women, the committee decided that his later career redeemed his earlier missteps.

Yet no such exceptions were made for Lincoln, Jefferson, and others on the list. In its rush to sweep historical evildoers off the stage, the committee erased much of San Francisco and California’s Hispanic heritage. Not just Father Junípero Serra, the spiritual head of Spain’s colonizing expedition, but also José Ortega, who as a member of the Portolá expedition discovered San Francisco Bay, and other other Spanish- and Mexican-era figures, had their names removed from schools because they engaged in or were associated with actions that harmed Native Americans. No one disputes that every colonizing group in California, from the Spanish to the Mexicans to the Americans (who engaged in actual genocide), had a dreadful record with native peoples. But for all of its supposed ethnic sensitivity, the committee seems not to have been concerned about removing Latin figures. Mythical entities also fell under the fatal gaze of the Purity Police. El Dorado Elementary, named after a fantastical kingdom whose fame circulated among Spanish explorers in the early 16th century and whose Goldfinger-like ruler was allegedly ceremonially covered by his subjects with gold dust, also made the list. Citing the death of native peoples that resulted from the Gold Rush, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that a committee member said, “I don’t think the concept of greed and lust for gold is a concept we want our children to be given”—an idealistic, if possibly futile, position in a city whose median household income exceeds $100,000.

snip
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

kas125

(2,472 posts)
1. Am I now supposed to care what Fox News thinks?
Wed Feb 3, 2021, 02:06 AM
Feb 2021

Um, no. I don't care what they'll say and I don't know why I have to read about it here.

 

VarryOn

(2,343 posts)
5. In a couple years, we'll see some place names (e.g. cities, counties, states, etc) be questioned...
Wed Feb 3, 2021, 02:55 AM
Feb 2021

Just think...how many Washington Counties are there? What about Jefferson County? There are many counties in the South named in honor Confederate heros, and I doubt every Union honoree would pass muster either. And I'd venture a guess that every state has counties and cities named after founding fathers, many of whom were slave owners.

Then think about how many places have religious-affiliated names...San, which means 'saint', is in tons of names. Pick any name in the Bible, and there's probably some place named after it.

Any place named after a person will, no doubt, be researched at some point. I would expect most will not pass the test. I live in Benton County, and I took a few minutes to research who it was named after. I learned it was named to honor five-term Missouri (not Arkansas????) Senator Thomas Hart Benton. In the first four paragraphs of his Wikipedia page, I learned he was an aide to Andrew Jackson and owned slaves. The first fact alone would likely doom him to the trash heap, but fact two makes it certain.

Places should be renamed using things like animals, flowers, astronomical bodies, or maybe elements from the periodic table. San Diego could become Daffodil, California; Washington state could be named Supernova, and my home county could become Whitetail County (we have lots here!).

To the San Francisco school board, which has a lot of schools to rename, they should just go old school and use numbers--Public School 17, High School 3, etc.

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
7. San Francisco should have just said that they wanted
Wed Feb 3, 2021, 02:56 AM
Feb 2021

to honor a more diverse group of people in naming the public schools. Then these school names could be replaced with more community celebration.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»San Francisco's move to r...