Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 765 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He just said (Original Post)
snowybirdie
Feb 2021
OP
KentuckyWoman
(6,697 posts)1. Haha. I heard it too.
DOJ .. go get him. His own lawyer says do it.
SallyHemmings
(1,823 posts)2. Send the appropriate law enforcement agent!
Lock him up!
Bev54
(10,074 posts)3. One does not preclude the other
Both are apt.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)4. He'll Be Back To Argue The Other Side At A Later Date
I'm sure for a fee, he'll argue that you can't charge Drumpf for actions he took WHILE "president."
He'll argue whatever works at the time. For now, that's to say it's too late to charge. If the time came, he'd argue that January 6 was too early to charge, since he was still President.
Pretzel Logic.