General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmucifer
(23,550 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,611 posts)yardwork
(61,650 posts)He wants the words removed from the record and Leahy seems confused.
bamagal62
(3,264 posts)Was ruling. I think all the yelling had him flustered. She ruled it wasnt allowed. Now they are going to vote on her ruling. I think?
Walleye
(31,028 posts)Doesnt say what he did say or what was incorrect as if we have to believe him
Montauk6
(8,079 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Mike Lee. She says the trumpers are getting frustrated and he wanted to disrupt.
TruckFump
(5,812 posts)...are struck because he claims they are not true. There was some discussion...jumbled discussion...of what rules applied and how they applied. Then an objection to an immediate vote on the mx to strike by Sen Lee by another Sen because no quorum is present. It appear they are calling roll to determine if a quorum is present.
dweller
(23,641 posts)Then what ?
🤔
✌🏻
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Mike Lee (R) from Utah rose from his seat to declare that statements attributed to him as recounted by the impeachment managers were not accurate and he requested that they be "stricken from the record."
They are now counting to establish a quorum.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Link to tweet
?s=21
Apparently it's parliamentarian of senate. She says his motion is out of order. That's what Leahy ruled. The rules of hearing don't give him right to strike his objection.
Lee is a Trump loyalist.
And all that was attributed to him is that he handed phone to Turberville.
BigmanPigman
(51,611 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,355 posts)I hope the Senate doesn't devolve into the circus that Jacketoff Jordan and that gang in the House created back with the 1st impeachment.
Dr Vegas
(456 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,611 posts)Nice analogy.