General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMarco Rubio Asks at Senate Trial If Hillary Clinton Can Be Impeached, Convicted, and Barred...
Marco Rubio Asks at Senate Trial If Hillary Clinton Can Be Impeached, Convicted, and Barred From Future Office Too
By Sarah Rumpf Feb 12th, 2021, 7:47 pm
During the portion of the impeachment trial for former President Donald Trump where Senators could ask questions, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) turned the topic to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, asking if she could also be impeached, convicted, and barred from holding future elected office.
-snip-
Rubios question was as follows:
First of all, I dont know how many times I can say it, House Lead Impeachment Manager Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) responded first, arguing that the jurisdictional issues are over and gone The Senate settled it.
Raskin then took some time to school fellow lawyer Rubio on the legal precedent, citing the Blunt and Belknap cases that both involved former officials, and in this case we have a president who committed his crimes against the republic while he was in office. He was impeached by the House of Representatives while he was in office.
more
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/marco-rubio-asks-at-senate-trial-if-hillary-clinton-can-be-impeached-convicted-and-barred-from-future-office-too/
Just_Vote_Dem
(2,813 posts)"DID I DO GOOD, MASTER???" and cowered in fear
superpatriotman
(6,252 posts)"hiciste un buen trabajo..."
Laelth
(32,017 posts)Next question.
-Laelth
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)and far more thoroughly than Trump thus far, and those investigations revealed that she did NOTHING wrong or illegal.
So yes, technically she could be impeached. But there is absolutely no sane case for doing so.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)I dont think that it willno time soon, in any event.
-Laelth
Irish_Dem
(47,209 posts)BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Why do they think this trolling carrys any weight with Democrats? Is this the new GQP corollary to Godwins Law?
NoMoreRepugs
(9,450 posts)it obviously KNOWS NOTHING.
Takket
(21,602 posts)honestly, if they just said yes, what is rubio going to say? LOL
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
LakeArenal
(28,835 posts)Step into the 2020s Republicans.
sop
(10,226 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Though, with the direction the state has been trending in the past decade, I have my doubts that Ill succeed. Still have to try, however.
bedazzled
(1,767 posts)both of our "senators" need replacement. first, that scumbag desantis has to go
W_HAMILTON
(7,870 posts)Trump was impeached while in office; Hillary is not in office and therefore could not be impeached, which means there would be no subsequent trial, so, no, fuck Marco Rubio and his question.
And I was just thinking, for all the talk about due process, if someone is impeached while in office but not allowed a trial afterwards -- even if they leave office in the mean time, like Trump -- I would say THAT would be depriving someone of due process. So the Republican argument that "you can't try someone out of office" is even more of a sham when you think about it like this.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)is because his supporters are stupider than he is. That really puts them at a low level, because here is a sitting senator who keeps proving that he doesn't know what impeachement means.
Stupid and slimy is a terrible way to go through life.