General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums🚨On Tuesday March 2nd, the Supreme Court will hear the most important voting rights case of the term
Link to tweet
?s=21
Marc E. Elias
@marceelias
🚨On Tuesday March 2nd, the Supreme Court will hear the most important voting rights case of the term: Brnovich v. DNC.
⚖️CASE WATCH: Brnovich v. DNC
democracydocket.com
https://t.co/RXF0QaCTmm?amp=1
elleng
(130,964 posts)The lawsuit is over five years in the making.
'In 2013, when the Supreme Court struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act in its Shelby County v. Holder decision, Arizona was suddenly released from the preclearance requirement. Before Shelby, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act had required states with a history of suppressing minority voterslike Arizonato receive preclearance by the DOJ or D.C. District Court before changing any of the states voting laws.
The result? In less than three years, Arizona created a culture of voter disenfranchisement by passing strict election laws that suppressed voters across the state, and which fell especially hard on minority voters.
One of these bills, passed in 2016, made it a felony to return someone elses signed and sealed ballot. This practicealso known as ballot collectionwas particularly popular among the Latinx community, who often have activists assist them by collecting their ballots during the get-out-the-vote period, and by Native Americans, many of whom live on rural tribal lands and lack easy access to a mailbox or post office. However, Republicans in the state had rallied against ballot collection after the former head of the Maricopa County Republicans spread an inaccurate and racially tinged video that falsely accused a Hispanic man of dropping off fraudulently harvested ballots.'
alwaysinasnit
(5,066 posts)mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)I remember reading about this when the Ninth Circuit struck it down.. now SCOTUS gets a crack at it.