Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 09:49 AM Mar 2021

Double standard? Gillibrand in spotlight after Cuomo scandal


By WILL WEISSERT
30 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Kirsten Gillibrand was the first Democratic senator to call for her colleague Al Franken’s resignation in 2017 as he faced allegations of sexual misconduct, building a profile as a leading advocate for women that became the centerpiece of her 2020 presidential bid.

But the New York senator is taking a different approach when it comes to sexual harassment allegations hitting closer to home, those against her state’s Democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo.

In a series of statements, Gillibrand has said accusations of offensive behavior by Cuomo are “serious and deeply concerning” and that the three women “who have come forward have shown tremendous courage.” She has said that the claims against Cuomo are “completely unacceptable” and called for a full investigation — but stopped short of demanding his resignation.

Top Democrats in New York and nationally have similarly refrained from suggesting that Cuomo step down. That includes New York’s senior senator and the chamber’s majority leader, Democrat Chuck Schumer. It’s a far more cautious approach than the parade of Democratic senators who followed Gillibrand’s lead in calling for Franken’s resignation.

more
https://apnews.com/article/kirsten-gillibrand-andrew-cuomo-al-franken-resignation-a3735f0f78ed6a8949b34cbc82239023

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Double standard? Gillibrand in spotlight after Cuomo scandal (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2021 OP
Why make this about Gillibrand ? JI7 Mar 2021 #1
Misogyny is definitely Sur Zobra Mar 2021 #5
Because they love to demonize her Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #6
Actually what you are omitting is that you couldn't make the connection Nixie Mar 2021 #20
No link Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #26
Look in your My Posts tab Nixie Mar 2021 #29
Still no link Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #30
Did your My Post tab go away? Nixie Mar 2021 #31
Still waiting for a link Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #32
So you don't remember almost 24 hours of repetitive posts?? Nixie Mar 2021 #33
And still waiting for a link Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #34
Do you have real positions? You couldn't forget them so fast, Nixie Mar 2021 #35
Here's another link Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #36
This article should answer your 24 hours of confusion Nixie Mar 2021 #38
This one is good too Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #40
2019 ? Nixie Mar 2021 #41
And another good one Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #42
Because she deserves it. Polly Hennessey Mar 2021 #11
Yes, indeed kcr Mar 2021 #12
+1 -K&R onetexan Mar 2021 #45
+1. I am so over the attack on Gilliband for Franken behavior whether he should have walked LizBeth Mar 2021 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2021 #21
Good Question Dorian Gray Mar 2021 #44
I have an easy solution to the inconsistent no_hypocrisy Mar 2021 #2
This! Thekaspervote Mar 2021 #7
Franken's Wellstone Progressivism likely had more to do with him being thrown under the bus sop Mar 2021 #3
Largely he had bad timing dsc Mar 2021 #4
I think he was just doing too good a job and getting too much TV time for some people. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2021 #14
Maybe she learned a lesson from the Franken debacle. Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2021 #8
What the fuck? BlueStater Mar 2021 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2021 #22
Gillibrand isn't a member of the NYS Government. brooklynite Mar 2021 #10
One word reaction- GRRRRRRRR! lark Mar 2021 #15
She was one of 39 senators Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #16
She lead the charge, and strongly I might add. n.t. lark Mar 2021 #17
She also accepted help from the Clinton's for YEARS. Nixie Mar 2021 #19
And Bernie was right there with her yet you insist we need him. MrsCoffee Mar 2021 #24
I think you mistake me for someone else. lark Mar 2021 #43
Nah, I've seen you post that we need Bernie. MrsCoffee Mar 2021 #46
We need every Democrat or person who caucuses with them, every single one. lark Mar 2021 #47
Probably with this guy. MrsCoffee Mar 2021 #48
So Warren, Sanders, Booker and Harris were all just blind followers? Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #27
Gillibrand accepted help from the Clinton's throughout her career, so there Nixie Mar 2021 #18
"The Clintons" iemanja Mar 2021 #37
Gillibrand accepted help from Bill Clinton Nixie Mar 2021 #39
Cuomo's actions are not Gillibrand's fault. iemanja Mar 2021 #49
My comment about Gillibrand was in relation to Nixie Mar 2021 #50
Your claim is that Me too accusers are by definition liars iemanja Mar 2021 #54
Actually, those are all your claims (accusations). Nixie Mar 2021 #56
And Monica admittedly flashed her panties at Bill Clinton. Nixie Mar 2021 #51
No, there were other charges against Bill Clinton iemanja Mar 2021 #53
Sorry, but your post doesn't make sense. It gets old Nixie Mar 2021 #57
Not credible ones. StevieM Mar 2021 #58
Back in time it was common Tree Lady Mar 2021 #55
The purpose of vilifying Gillibrand is to double down on the misogyny iemanja Mar 2021 #23
+1 MrsCoffee Mar 2021 #25
Exactly right Dem4Life1102 Mar 2021 #28
+1 nt PunkinPi Mar 2021 #52
 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
6. Because they love to demonize her
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 10:32 AM
Mar 2021

What the article omits is that over 30 other Senators called for Franken to resign the same day, some just a few minutes after Gillibrand. It also omits that Gillibrand wasn't even the first to go on national TV to call for Franken's resignation, that was Harris.

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
20. Actually what you are omitting is that you couldn't make the connection
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 10:05 AM
Mar 2021

as to why Gillibrand has any connection to what de Blasio said about Cuomo.

Here ya' go! A whole article about it....

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
33. So you don't remember almost 24 hours of repetitive posts??
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 01:06 PM
Mar 2021

You were very insistent for almost 24 hours. Now not so much.

Did you check your My Posts tab?

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
38. This article should answer your 24 hours of confusion
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 01:51 PM
Mar 2021

about why another poster brought up Gillibrand in relation to Cuomo.

LizBeth

(9,952 posts)
13. +1. I am so over the attack on Gilliband for Franken behavior whether he should have walked
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 11:42 AM
Mar 2021

away or not. So clear the misdirection.

Response to JI7 (Reply #1)

no_hypocrisy

(46,213 posts)
2. I have an easy solution to the inconsistent
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 10:02 AM
Mar 2021

statements by Gillibrand: publicly and explicitly admit you were wrong about demanding Al Franken resign and that you denied him due process. You assumed he was guilty before all the facts were analyzed. Call Al now and get your press release ready before Noon.

sop

(10,271 posts)
3. Franken's Wellstone Progressivism likely had more to do with him being thrown under the bus
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 10:02 AM
Mar 2021

than anything else.

dsc

(52,167 posts)
4. Largely he had bad timing
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 10:15 AM
Mar 2021

we were busy, sensibly it should be noted, pointing out what a complete skeeze Roy Moore was while Franken had his moment.

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
9. What the fuck?
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 10:44 AM
Mar 2021

What about Elise Stefanik, who has been absolutely obsessive in her demands that Cuomo resign while never once calling on Trump to do the same? Where’s the article about her blatant and shameless hypocrisy?

Response to BlueStater (Reply #9)

brooklynite

(94,751 posts)
10. Gillibrand isn't a member of the NYS Government.
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 10:46 AM
Mar 2021

And (much good it'll do), a reminder that EVERY Senate Democrat except for Manchin took the same position regarding Franken.

lark

(23,160 posts)
15. One word reaction- GRRRRRRRR!
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 01:09 PM
Mar 2021

Wish she was this smart back in the day and we'd still have our great senator.

 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
16. She was one of 39 senators
Thu Mar 4, 2021, 01:14 PM
Mar 2021

So even if she didn’t call for Franken to resign there would have still been 38 other Senators calling for him to do so.

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
19. She also accepted help from the Clinton's for YEARS.
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 09:59 AM
Mar 2021

Then she says in 2017 that Bill should have resigned over sexual harassment charges.

lark

(23,160 posts)
43. I think you mistake me for someone else.
Sat Mar 6, 2021, 08:01 AM
Mar 2021

Senator Sanders is not my fave and I haven't been a big fan since the Hillary times. I am very glad he got on board the Biden train, though, yes.

MrsCoffee

(5,803 posts)
46. Nah, I've seen you post that we need Bernie.
Sat Mar 6, 2021, 10:53 AM
Mar 2021

And yet you say you aren’t even a big fan.

But no such leeway given to this woman.

Some of us can see this so clearly. Maybe because we have dealt with it our entire lives.

lark

(23,160 posts)
47. We need every Democrat or person who caucuses with them, every single one.
Sat Mar 6, 2021, 11:00 AM
Mar 2021

Other than that, nope, swing and a miss. I was for Biden the entire time and immediately chose him as my avatar when we could pick during the primaries. I was for Biden before he was even running, knew he had what America would buy, decency and competence.

Don't know who you are confusing me with?

 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
27. So Warren, Sanders, Booker and Harris were all just blind followers?
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 11:55 AM
Mar 2021

And Gillibrand wasn't even the first to go on TV to call for Franken's resignation. That was Harris.

&t=8s

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
18. Gillibrand accepted help from the Clinton's throughout her career, so there
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 09:58 AM
Mar 2021

is no "double standard." Her 2017 comments about Bill Clinton resigning are what distinguishes her from the other politicians. The Clinton brand was good enough for her for years, and then she came out with 2017 comments about Bill. It's just that simple. It's what people are not remembering about her when evaluating the other politician's positions.

Her own words don't recognize her own role in why she of all Senators has been criticized:
“Who is being held accountable for Al Franken’s decision to resign? Women senators, including me,” Gillibrand said in July 2019, about a month before she left the presidential race. “It’s outrageous. It’s absurd.”

iemanja

(53,072 posts)
37. "The Clintons"
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 01:27 PM
Mar 2021

didn't commit sexual abuse. Bill Clinton did.
But keep blaming women for the actions of men.

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
39. Gillibrand accepted help from Bill Clinton
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 01:54 PM
Mar 2021

Bill Clinton is an ex President, so he didn’t have to do much to help her. This was after he was President, so you do the math.

iemanja

(53,072 posts)
49. Cuomo's actions are not Gillibrand's fault.
Sat Mar 6, 2021, 01:36 PM
Mar 2021

It's as though you think her behavior is worse than sexual harassment. In fact, that is the point of your effort at deflection. Gillibrand is vilified because she doesn't cooperate with male supremacy. The days when men can get away with anything are coming to an end. Me Too has shown that women have a right to decide who touches their bodies. That decision does not belong to the men who feel entitled to kiss, touch, grab, fondle, or have sex without a women's consent.

That you blamed Hillary for Bill's behavior by referring to "the Clintons" sexual assault reveals a great deal. In your effort to target Gillibrand in order to defect from the alleged sexual harasser Cuomo, your go to method is to defoul another women.


Nixie

(16,993 posts)
50. My comment about Gillibrand was in relation to
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 09:42 AM
Mar 2021

her 2017 comments about Bill Clinton. It’s just that simple and doesn’t deserve all this angst and dishonesty about a simple observation.

She accepted “the Clinton’s” help politically, which had nothing to do with Bill’s affair with Monica. So the observation is that Gillibrand (not all women) —- Gillibrand —- might be the one with double standards. She accepted help from a supposedly known sexual harasser when it benefitted her. It’s just that simple.

And have you ever known a MeToo accuser in real life? I do, and this individual is a liar. I have personal and documented experience about her lies which I happily shared with a private detective who knocked on my door about her. So sorry, but I’m not sold on the idea of giving any individual unfettered permission to smear others. This woman I know lied about other women, as well. Some people lie.



iemanja

(53,072 posts)
54. Your claim is that Me too accusers are by definition liars
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 03:04 PM
Mar 2021

because you know one in real life? Poor men. However do they endure a world in which they can't harass, assault, and rape at will. You sure showed those women.
Your post absolutely confirms my earlier comments. I see you.

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
56. Actually, those are all your claims (accusations).
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 04:29 PM
Mar 2021

Not mine. Women lying about other women is not about men, as in the MeToo accuser example I gave. It’s about liars.

I’m on to the accusations around here, though, so no worries about what you think you see. Wink.

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
51. And Monica admittedly flashed her panties at Bill Clinton.
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 10:00 AM
Mar 2021

She should have been fired for that. Who goes around showing their underwear at work? She should have been removed immediately. So where are we getting “sexual assault” about the Bill/Monica affair??

This kind of morphing isn’t good for discussion. Bill had an affair with Monica. Now we’re calling it assault.

iemanja

(53,072 posts)
53. No, there were other charges against Bill Clinton
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 02:59 PM
Mar 2021

That I don't care to get into. It wasn't just Monica.
And if you don't think Bill Clinton committed any offenses, why are you blaming Gillibrand for "taking help" from "the Clintons"? Just opportunism? ETA: Based on your other post, I see it's far more nefarious than opportunism.

Nixie

(16,993 posts)
57. Sorry, but your post doesn't make sense. It gets old
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 04:36 PM
Mar 2021

being followed for days about a simple observation with responses that get more and more abstract just to pretend there’s some big gotcha when all I brought up was common sense.

Gillibrand is complaining she is being vilified because she’s a woman and I observed that it was probably about her double standards with Bill Clinton. If he had so many charges against him, then why on earth would she have accepted his help to build her political career?? You’re actually making it worse for her if that’s the case.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
58. Not credible ones.
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 04:39 PM
Mar 2021

The best evidence indicates that Clinton's accusers were swift boaters. And every single one of them was connected to Ken Starr.

Tree Lady

(11,499 posts)
55. Back in time it was common
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 03:39 PM
Mar 2021

JFK, FDR both had mistresses that were well known.

I think when religion started having more say in politics is when it became a big issue, people thought it was normal before.

So long as both people are ok with it, it turns into judgement. With the exception being that our employment laws have changed.

iemanja

(53,072 posts)
23. The purpose of vilifying Gillibrand is to double down on the misogyny
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 10:14 AM
Mar 2021

Last edited Fri Mar 5, 2021, 01:25 PM - Edit history (1)

that insists men should never be held accountable for their actions and that women are instead to blame. It's about promoting a culture of male supremacy and impunity for sexual harassment and sexual assault. People can make every excuse to justify such cases, but the ultimate result of such discourse is to ensure that male sexual abuse continues unfettered.

In such cases, men are ALWAYS defended and the women always called liars. That they then turn around and blame a woman for those men's behavior is an extension of those goals.

Note that many male Senators also spoke out against Franken, including Bernie Sanders. Yet those same people would never dream of blaming Sanders. It doesn't fit their agenda.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Double standard? Gillibra...