Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 12:23 PM Mar 2021

$69 million for a jpeg? (There's just too much money out there in the wrong places)

?quality=90&auto=webp

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/11/arts/design/nft-auction-christies-beeple.html

After a flurry of more than 180 bids in the final hour, a JPG file made by Mike Winkelmann, the digital artist known as Beeple, was sold on Thursday by Christie’s in an online auction for $69.3 million with fees. The price was a new high for an artwork that exists only digitally, beating auction records for physical paintings by museum-valorized greats like J.M.W. Turner, Georges Seurat and Francisco Goya. Bidding at the two-week Beeple sale, consisting of just one lot, began at $100.

With seconds remaining, the work was set to sell for less than $30 million, but a last-moment cascade of bids prompted a two-minute extension of the auction and pushed the final price over $60 million. Rebecca Riegelhaupt, a Christie’s spokeswoman, said 33 active bidders had contested the work, adding that the result was the third-highest auction price achieved for a living artist, after Jeff Koons and David Hockney.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$69 million for a jpeg? (There's just too much money out there in the wrong places) (Original Post) TreasonousBastard Mar 2021 OP
It was actually $69.3 million. TwilightZone Mar 2021 #1
Dumb typo. But that makes it worse. TreasonousBastard Mar 2021 #3
A .png maybe, but a .jpg never! n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2021 #2
Ha. TwilightZone Mar 2021 #4
I just right clicked on it for free. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2021 #5
Congratulations! You now own an original pixelgraph! Buns_of_Fire Mar 2021 #6
Jeff Coons, lol. PT Barnum was right DenaliDemocrat Mar 2021 #7
George Carlin was, as usual, right. Buns_of_Fire Mar 2021 #8
I like Beeple's stuff, but would never pay these prices! 7wo7rees Mar 2021 #9
Money laundering, anyone? meadowlander Mar 2021 #10
Crazy money, but I'd love a poster. It's very cool! nolabear Mar 2021 #11

TwilightZone

(25,472 posts)
1. It was actually $69.3 million.
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 12:28 PM
Mar 2021

The determination of what constitutes "art" has always been personal and subjective. Apparently at least 33 people considered this a worthy example of same.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,183 posts)
6. Congratulations! You now own an original pixelgraph!
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 12:54 PM
Mar 2021

Please remit $25 to the artist for your Certificate of Authenticity and to avoid future regret.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,183 posts)
8. George Carlin was, as usual, right.
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 01:01 PM
Mar 2021
If you nail together two things that have never been nailed together before, some fool will buy it from you.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»$69 million for a jpeg? (...