Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,104 posts)
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 04:33 PM Mar 2021

So the Grand Jury has another tape of the "Former Guy" trying to bribe another official?

I saw a clip on CNN this morning. They had him on tape. He was telling them how bad everything was in Fulton County and that she would be highly praised if she would do his bidding.

It was most inappropriate, to say the least, and very likely, illegal.

He was at the point where he had no concern for the law or anything else, so long as he could try to win the election.

It was all a precursor to the inciting the insurrection at the Capitol.

What a low-life he is.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So the Grand Jury has another tape of the "Former Guy" trying to bribe another official? (Original Post) kentuck Mar 2021 OP
It is looking more about setting the stage for Jan 6 and declaring martial law than winning Irish_Dem Mar 2021 #1
I think Georgia was so close and it helped him twist the story underpants Mar 2021 #2
He most likely went after Georgia instead of Wisconsin because of the black vote. Lonestarblue Mar 2021 #15
I agree on the black vote. underpants Mar 2021 #16
I have the NYT transcript in fron of me re: call with Raffensberger. WarGamer Mar 2021 #19
It's also possible leftieNanner Mar 2021 #3
My thoughts also... kentuck Mar 2021 #8
dumb listening to stupid. trump and flynn. magats and fox. erronis Mar 2021 #13
That's how frigging conniving "it" is! Can you KPN Mar 2021 #14
Typical of sociopaths and narcissistic personality disorders. They go thru their whole lives Irish_Dem Mar 2021 #17
Rachel played some of the tape last night leftieNanner Mar 2021 #4
It is clear to me that two things are certain... Moostache Mar 2021 #5
Two instances could mean RICO soothsayer Mar 2021 #6
And he has NO PARDON!! (unless he secret pardoned himself) bluestarone Mar 2021 #7
I seriously doubt that would ever hold up in any court? kentuck Mar 2021 #9
Former Guy loves the attention sarcasmo Mar 2021 #10
Chris Hayes comment hibbing Mar 2021 #11
It was quite interesting that he mentioned January 6th in the call... kentuck Mar 2021 #12
I heard tapes of him talking to the folks in GA. WarGamer Mar 2021 #18

Irish_Dem

(47,140 posts)
1. It is looking more about setting the stage for Jan 6 and declaring martial law than winning
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 04:38 PM
Mar 2021

the election. We wondered why he was even bothering with GA since it did not give him an election win. It was about "proving" the election was rigged so he could declare ML.

underpants

(182,839 posts)
2. I think Georgia was so close and it helped him twist the story
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 04:42 PM
Mar 2021

Wisconsin was just as close but he went after Georgia.

His MO is to change the story and then declare victory even when he loses - lawsuits, his lawsuits, casinos, etc. This is no different.

Lonestarblue

(10,024 posts)
15. He most likely went after Georgia instead of Wisconsin because of the black vote.
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 07:24 PM
Mar 2021

I was disappointed after hearing this taoe that the women, I think her name was Frances, did not even try to correct Trump when he claimed he had won and something bad had happened. That was a perfect opportunity for her to tell the truth that he had lost. Why didn’t she?

I think this tape is less damaging than the call to Raffensberger.

WarGamer

(12,452 posts)
19. I have the NYT transcript in fron of me re: call with Raffensberger.
Fri Mar 12, 2021, 12:02 AM
Mar 2021

What part are you talking about?

I see gibberish and a complete lack of knowledge... I see delusion.

I don't see anything illegal in his WORDS.

leftieNanner

(15,127 posts)
3. It's also possible
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 04:43 PM
Mar 2021

that he may have thought if he got one of the states to flip the results, then he would be able to go to the others and insist that they do so as well. You are right that Georgia alone would not have changed the result.

I think he definitely was listening to Flynn about the ML bit. If the military hadn't told him POINT BLANK that they would not follow any orders like that, he might have gone ahead and tried it.

kentuck

(111,104 posts)
8. My thoughts also...
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 04:48 PM
Mar 2021

If he could have gotten Georgia declared for him, he would have declared the other states for himself, throwing into doubt the entire election.

erronis

(15,306 posts)
13. dumb listening to stupid. trump and flynn. magats and fox.
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 07:18 PM
Mar 2021

There are some smart people in the wings but none of these are those smart people.

KPN

(15,646 posts)
14. That's how frigging conniving "it" is! Can you
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 07:19 PM
Mar 2021

imagine going through life with your mind constantly in that mode? What manipulation can I do to put me in the best position to get what I want? Not, what can I do honestly and genuinely to give myself the best chances to succeed in achieving my goal, but what can I manipulate and what do I have to manipulate to get what I want?

It’s mind-blowing!

Irish_Dem

(47,140 posts)
17. Typical of sociopaths and narcissistic personality disorders. They go thru their whole lives
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 10:46 PM
Mar 2021

like this. Claiming victim status, always conniving and manipulating others for gain.
If they spent half as much time doing the right thing they could have been successful.
But they are really too crazy, and cannot think in a normal way.

leftieNanner

(15,127 posts)
4. Rachel played some of the tape last night
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 04:45 PM
Mar 2021

And she very rarely plays his voice on her show.

It was stunning! C'mon Grand Jury! Do your job!

Moostache

(9,897 posts)
5. It is clear to me that two things are certain...
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 04:45 PM
Mar 2021

1) Trump studied Hitler and Mussolini in the hopes of becoming a dictator for life
2) Like everything else in his entire life, he was a resounding failure at execution...

The scariest thing is our system's vulnerabilities and our population's propensity for adhering to dictatorial command were laid bare for all to see. It will still take the combination of a conniving gameshow host AND a brilliant strategist to recreate the situation of 06-Jan-2021....but IF that does happen, the world will know another round of fascism and dictators and a very likely 3rd World War with hellish outcomes.

We barely dodged a bullet because the moron with the gun this time is lucky he has people around to tie his shoes and make sure he is not crapping himself and sitting in it for hours. Next time, I doubt we get that lucky twice...

kentuck

(111,104 posts)
9. I seriously doubt that would ever hold up in any court?
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 05:00 PM
Mar 2021

Not a secret pardon. Not a public pardon. There is no law on Earth that would permit a person to pardon themselves, in my opinion.

hibbing

(10,098 posts)
11. Chris Hayes comment
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 06:55 PM
Mar 2021

If this would have been an alderman in Chicago doing this they would have been charged right away, paraphrasing, but that's basically it.


Peace

kentuck

(111,104 posts)
12. It was quite interesting that he mentioned January 6th in the call...
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 07:16 PM
Mar 2021

He said it was going to be a very important date...

WarGamer

(12,452 posts)
18. I heard tapes of him talking to the folks in GA.
Fri Mar 12, 2021, 12:00 AM
Mar 2021

Not sure if he's a complete moron or a genius (ok, I know the answer to that) but there's nothing clear in his spoken words.

And probably nothing illegal.

I suggest listening to the tape.

"Something bad happened..."

"The ballots are corrupt..."

"I just want to find 11,780 votes..."

"Did they shred ballots?"

"Dominion moved the machines out..."

"Brad, there's nothing wrong with saying you recalculated..."



Those are the highlights of the Raffensberger call.

Do we all KNOW what he meant? Sure.

But did he actually SAY any of that? no.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So the Grand Jury has ano...