Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPOLITICO Playbook: What Ron Klain told progressives behind closed doors
By RACHAEL BADE, RYAN LIZZA, TARA PALMERI and EUGENE DANIELS 03/18/2021 06:17 AM EDT
SCOOP: WHITE HOUSE CONSIDERING BREAKING UP BUILD BACK BETTER Leaders of the Congressional Progressive Caucus met with White House chief of staff RON KLAIN at the White House on Wednesday morning. We caught up with CPC Chair PRAMILA JAYAPAL (D-Wash.) on Wednesday night, and heres what she told us:
1) ON BUILD BACK BETTER: Progressives pressed for a commitment that President JOE BIDENS jobs plan will address not only transportation but climate change, health care and so-called family infrastructure, things like child care and paid leave. Jayapal laid out concerns that those things wont be possible unless Democrats go the 51-vote reconciliation route, as opposed to trying to cut a deal with Republicans. We can either go green, or we can go bipartisan, because I just dont think that Republicans are ready to have a transformative package and so I said that at the White House, Jayapal said.
Klain did not say what the plan was. But he indicated to the CPC leaders that the White House is exploring different options, including the possibility of breaking up the jobs package into as many as three bills, according to Jayapal. Some could garner bipartisan support; and some could be done through reconciliation.
I think they share that commitment to addressing climate in this infrastructure package, Jayapal said. Maybe thats part of the reason they were saying there may be multiple bills.
In theory, thered be at least a handful of Republicans who would back a narrower package to pay for new roads and bridges because they think the country needs it and their constituents want it but not want to go further. The question is whether the GOP would be willing to cut a deal knowing that another trillion-dollar bill could be next.
more
https://www.politico.com/playbook
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1333 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
POLITICO Playbook: What Ron Klain told progressives behind closed doors (Original Post)
DonViejo
Mar 2021
OP
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)1. Why waste time and effort, to give some Republicans a positive
spin going into the 2022 cycle ? I prefer the narrative that Democrats tried to be bipartisan but Republicans had no interest in helping the American people.
underpants
(182,904 posts)2. Wow I shoulda known it. Flipped over to Fox this morning...
they were on the immigration crisis (of course). During the footage the voiceover said these are the same facilities and were very adamant about it. It stood out due to their own emphasis and because I hadnt heard that before.
When in fact: Trump administrations move to dismantle immigration facilities and infrastructure at the border.