Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho Would Believe Me?
March 23, 2021 at 9:05 am EDT By Taegan Goddard
Facing more than $1.3 billion in liabilities over her post-election conspiracy theories, lawyer Sidney Powell told a judge that the defamation lawsuit Dominion Voting Systems filed against her earlier this year should be dismissed because no reasonable person would believe that her well-publicized comments about an international plot against former President Donald Trump were statements of fact,' according to Law & Crime.
###
https://politicalwire.com/2021/03/23/who-would-believe-me/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 732 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who Would Believe Me? (Original Post)
DonViejo
Mar 2021
OP
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)1. So she is saying she should be disbarred because she's a well-known liar?
OK.
ananda
(28,868 posts)4. Lol. Works for me.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)2. Please allow me to LOL on this one...............
Clash City Rocker
(3,396 posts)3. I don't think it has to appeal to reasonable people to be defamation
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)5. Tucker Carlson's attorneys used that argument and the federal judge
agreed, applying the "reasonable person" standard to Fox viewers, raising huge questions of what is a reasonable person these days and how applicable it is.
"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
Carlson was a cable entertainer performing on his show, though, and she's not.
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)6. So she's saying she aims her lies at unreasonable people? This is another lie.
To be dismissed as vague and unsubstantiated, surely?