UN Peacekeepers can act as electoral security, yet no Republicans have ever called for a US Mission

[ck4829]

to deal with all that rampant voter fraud they keep saying is happening...

They keep saying it's happening, that it cost them Trump the White House, yet the only strategy they have to fight this is "Make it harder to vote", I think we need to help them out, you know...

A UN Peacekeeping mission
Have 100% election turnout as a baseline, anything other than that number could be voter fraud
What else can we do?

See also:
Hey, wouldn't voter fraud be easier to detect if turnout was SUPPOSED to be 100%?

[Iliyah]

1. For one thing, republicans hate the UN . .. ..

[ck4829]

2. You'd think they'd be able to put that hate aside

[rampartc]

4. never. they have defunded the un in the past

(our dues were paid for years by ted turner to maintain membership.) i sure hope that we now plan to rejoin the world health org and the other vital functions provided by the un. but expect zero bipartisanship on the issue.

[Amishman]

3. They would be shot on sight in large areas of the country

The idea of the UN participating in any sort of active role (or even a high visibility passive role) on US soil is a non-starter due to the violence that would be directed at them. The only way they can be of any assistance is if the general public doesn't know they are here.

Hundreds of thousands of brainwashed rightwing nationalists would lose their minds and attack. I know a few likely candidates just in my community (very red rural area)