Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
Mon Mar 29, 2021, 04:48 PM Mar 2021

DoD linguist pleads guilty to transmitting highly sensitive info

A Defense Department linguist working at an overseas U.S. military facility pleaded guilty to transmitting highly sensitive national defense information to a person she believed would pass it to a foreign terrorist organization. More from @TheJusticeDept: http://ow.ly/RYhZ50EbhJa





During today’s plea hearing, Thompson admitted that, beginning in 2017, she started communicating with her unindicted co-conspirator using a video-chat feature on a secure text and voice messaging application. Over time, Thompson developed a romantic interest in her co-conspirator. Thompson learned that the unindicted co-conspirator had a family member who was in the Lebanese Ministry of the Interior, and that the unindicted co-conspirator claimed to have received a ring from Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary-general of Lebanese Hizballah.

http://ow.ly/RYhZ50EbhJa


And they still natter on about HRC's emails!
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DoD linguist pleads guilty to transmitting highly sensitive info (Original Post) Generic Other Mar 2021 OP
They were communicating over a secure text and voice messaging application? gratuitous Mar 2021 #1
Obviously not a very cunning one. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2021 #2
Not very... Baked Potato Mar 2021 #8
Sure. Because when everyone's watching Hillary, no one's watching them Budi Mar 2021 #3
The person was caught. Obviously they were paying attention jimfields33 Mar 2021 #4
I was referring to the added line in the op. Budi Mar 2021 #5
Sorry. I didn't catch the entire thing even though I read it. jimfields33 Mar 2021 #6
No worry. We're good Budi Mar 2021 #7
I meant the repubs Generic Other Mar 2021 #9

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. They were communicating over a secure text and voice messaging application?
Mon Mar 29, 2021, 04:56 PM
Mar 2021

Some judges would rule that that's just like talking to yourself, and not actionable as criminal conduct:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215280634

Okay, this is a federal versus State of Michigan thing, but Judge Klaeren of Michigan seems to have discovered some new protection for criminal defendants if they plot their crimes on private encrypted communications services.

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
3. Sure. Because when everyone's watching Hillary, no one's watching them
Mon Mar 29, 2021, 05:03 PM
Mar 2021

It's a script straight out of a Hollywood movie.


"And they still natter on about HRC's emails!"

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
5. I was referring to the added line in the op.
Mon Mar 29, 2021, 05:18 PM
Mar 2021
"And they still natter on about HRC's emails!"
What was allowed done to Sec Clinton was a shameful case of 'look over there while we loot your house'..

****

I wasn't referring to the OP itself.
I knew a guy who worked with data collection in Afghanistan.
Needless to say he's failed an FBI poly 3 times since his return 8 yrs ago.
Can't tell any more about that.


So indeed, this story is a success & grateful for this one
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DoD linguist pleads guilt...