Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVaccine Passports and the Categorical Impermissibility of Inconveniencing Republicans
https://modelcitizen.substack.com/p/vaccine-passports-and-the-categoricalConservatives have been freaking out about the mere possibility of vaccine passports, government-issued documents certifying the bearers Covid jabs.
The idea isnt that the government will require proof of vaccination for anything. The idea is that the ability to credibly prove vaccination status will speed the restoration of normal social and economic life. This works by allowing businesses, schools, sports leagues, etc. to discriminate against those who havent been vaccinated. Now, because a lot of wealthier white folks have been butting in line and members of some less privileged groups are less likely to have gotten their shots, there are real, legitimate worries about discrimination on the basis of vaccine status. It could conceivably exacerbate invidious inequalities based on race, class, and so forth.
But these obviously arent the concerns that have conservatives exercised. Indeed, one of the bright lines dividing American liberals and conservatives concerns the limits of freedom of association. Conservatives, and especially those with a libertarian streak, are far more likely to be absolutists about the right to exclude anyone from your property, business, or private club or association for any reason. Rand Paul, who infamously opposes the part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibits private businesses from discrimination on race, is a good example. Remember when Rachel Maddow asked him about the integration of lunch counters and he said, Does the owner of the restaurant own his restaurant? Or does the government own his restaurant?
If the Civil Rights Act is problematic because it infringes on freedom of association, the permissibility of discriminating against customers who might carry a fatal infection is a total no-brainer. Right? Ha!
Jesse Kelly, an eleventh-rate Limbaugh wannabe who bills himself as the greatest mind of the 21st century, has beautifully encapsulated the Orwellian doublethink inherent in the ersatz libertarianism of the authoritarian right.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 562 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vaccine Passports and the Categorical Impermissibility of Inconveniencing Republicans (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Apr 2021
OP
Response to Nevilledog (Original post)
LetMyPeopleVote This message was self-deleted by its author.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,345 posts)2. I believe in vaccine passports
The fact that these passports will piss off low IQ conservatives is a bonus. Again, idiots who are too stupid to take the vaccine should be excluded from going to functions with sane and intelligent people
Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)5. I'm with you
Love when these people won't be able to go to hotels and travel overseas because of their obstinance.
kairos12
(12,862 posts)3. No smoking sections.
Same thing.
The Magistrate
(95,248 posts)4. That's An Excellent Piece, Ma'am
Thank you for sharing it.
Nevilledog
(51,129 posts)6. You're welcome, my dear.