General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA coalition of 60 law firms has joined business leaders to oppose laws making harder to vote
This makes me smile https://electionlawblog.org/?p=121608
Mr. Karp said the coalition would emphatically denounce legislative efforts to make voting harder, not easier, for all eligible voters, by imposing unnecessary obstacles and barriers on the right to vote.
Many of Wall Streets most powerful firms are also part of the effort, including Simpson Thacher; Skadden Arps; Akin Gump; Cravath, Swaine & Moore; Ropes & Gray; Sullivan & Cromwell; Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Wachtell Lipton.
We plan to challenge any election law that would impose unnecessary barriers on the right to vote and that would disenfranchise underrepresented groups in our country, Mr. Karp said.
The firms will work with the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonprofit organization, to identify laws that it might challenge in court. Mr. Karp said that could include challenging the voting law that Republicans passed in Georgia last month, and which set off a national debate over voting rights.
Diamond_Dog
(32,073 posts)nykym
(3,063 posts)refuse to represent any legislator who goes along with the restrictive voting laws.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)You do not want to know what their average billing rates are. Most state legislatures could not afford these firms
wryter2000
(46,082 posts)My understanding was you can't sue someone unless you've been hurt in some way. No one is going to be hurt by these laws until they try to register or vote. How can someone bring suit now?
Is it a matter of asking for an injunction to prevent the hurt in advance?
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)You can seek an injunction to prevent the violation of a civil or other right
MerryHolidays
(7,715 posts)When you couple their collective legal firepower with someone like Marc Elias, the Rethugs are toast. It is also a sure sign that the many huge companies they represent in the US and around the world are comfortable with their legal counsel being so public about their support to fight the patently illegal actions to suppress votes.
Seriously....completely blackened burnt toast...
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)Link to tweet
We support voting rights for all Americans, oppose any undue and discriminatory restrictions to the ballot box, and stand firmly with those who support full and fair access to the voting process in Georgia and across the country, Troutman Pepper said in statement provided to Bloomberg Law by spokeswoman Diane Iselin.,,,,,
arp, the Paul Weiss chairman, has asked the leaders of the 100 largest law firms in the country to sign on to a general statement denouncing all efforts to restrict the constitutional right of every eligible American to vote and to participate in our democracy, according to an email obtained by Bloomberg Law. The statement doesnt specifically reference Georgia.
Fifteen firms have signed on to the statement, Karp told other industry leaders in a Tuesday email.
Those firms are: Akin Gump; Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton; Cravath Swaine & Moore; Davis Polk & Wardwell; Debevoise & Plimpton; Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson; Milbank; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius; OMelveny & Myers; Ropes & Gray; Simpson Thacher; Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom; Sullivan & Cromwell; Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz; and Weil Gotshal & Manges.
malaise
(269,178 posts)Rec
PortTack
(32,794 posts)Mind.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)My money is on the big law firms!
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)This also makes me smile
Link to tweet
Equal access to voting is a fundamental right in the United States, the statement, which doesnt explicitly mention Georgia, says. We, the undersigned law firm managing partners and corporate general counsel, denounce all efforts to restrict the constitutional right of every eligible American to vote and to participate in our democracy.
The top lawyers that have signed the letter represent companies like American International Group Inc., Starbucks Corp., ViacomCBS Inc., and Bristol Myers Squibb Co. None of the in-house leaders who had signed the statement as of Monday afternoon work for Georgia-headquartered companies.
More than 60 leaders of AmLaw 100 firms have also signed on in support of making voting easier, not harder, for all eligible voters, said the statement, which was circulated among legal industry leaders by Paul Weiss Chairman Brad Karp and AIG General Counsel Lucy Fato.
Red Mountain
(1,737 posts)who will oppose them?
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)These firms are stepping up to fight GOP voter suppression https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/top-private-law-firms-plan-swat-teams-fight-voting-laws-n1263891?fbclid=IwAR0YgQfAX9-aVGI9V7uCL656oy63MKKJIPSXFrrauxOiNW2DP3lom8fG4Fg
More than a dozen of the country's top law firms have committed to join forces to challenge voting restrictions across the country, adding legal might to the corporate pressure campaign opposing Republican-led attempts to overhaul elections in the wake of former President Donald Trump's loss.
One of the effort's leaders, Brad Karp, chairman of the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison of New York, said Monday that 16 firms had signed on so far, including his. The lawyers will act like "SWAT teams" for legal action, he said. Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management professor who is working to help mobilize corporate America against the restrictions, described the legal coalition as an "army of election law experts ready to dispatch at a moment's notice."
The group came together from conversations among major law firms about publicly taking a stand against restrictive voting laws like the one enacted in Georgia last month, as well as bills under consideration in Texas, Arizona, Florida and other states.