General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolice Unions: What to Know and Why They Don't Belong in the Labor Movement
Police Unions: What to Know and Why They Dont Belong in the Labor Movement
https://www.teenvogue.com/story/what-to-know-police-unions-labor-movement
Police unions have always been outliers among organized labor, and there are many reasons why the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) union has long refused to allow cops (and prison guards) into its organization. For one thing, no other union members hold the legal ability to straight-up kill another human being while on the job. If an ironworker bashed someones head onto the concrete, or a retail worker shot someone in the back as they were running away, or a graduate student worker ground their knee into someones neck until they stopped breathing, there would be consequences. Actually, police unions themselves used to be illegal, because local governments worried about the consequences of allowing armed state agents to organize. And historically speaking, the police have been no friend to workers, whether officers were shooting at the families of coal miners during the Battle of Blair Mountain, crushing the ribs of immigrant garment workers during the Uprising of the 20,000, or teargassing working-class protesters in Minneapolis after police killed George Floyd. [snip]
Williams argues that the shared workplace identity that makes up the thin blue line mentality for cops transcends other identity markers, and shows how they view themselves as police first, and everything else second. As such, police unions tend to keep their distance from the rest of the labor movement (unless theyre cracking its members skulls). Even the basic terminology is different. These organizations are usually broken down into lodges instead of locals, and are more often known as associations rather than unions. Some people balk at the thought of referring to police associations as unions at all, and its understandable why, though for the sake of this piece, well hold our noses and use the more common term. Labor unions exist to protect people; police exist to protect property. They may carry their version of union cards and enjoy the benefits of collective bargaining agreements, but thats about where the similarities between cops and unionized workers end.
Collective bargaining agreements like the ones that protect many unionized workers arent necessarily the problem; police are state employees, and the contracts they work under are not always entirely dissimilar from those that protect public sector workers. The agreements that are different, though, are part of the reason it can be so hard to fire officers who have committed even the most horrific abuses or murder, and they allow police officers privileges that go above and beyond what a normal worker might expect. Contracts that include so-called Law Enforcement Bill of Rights language are even worse, giving cops extra protections when they face investigations over use of force; in Baltimore, for example, these protections have been blamed for getting in the way of properly investigating the 2014 death of Freddie Gray. [snip]
Contracts aside, the biggest problem with police unions is the institutional power they wield, and the ways they choose to wield it. Theyve amassed enormous political capital through lobbying and cultivating relationships with politicians, including President Trump. And all too often, these apparent labor organizations advise cops on how to avoid being reprimanded for misconduct, act as a shield to prevent killer cops from facing consequences, and try to force the reinstatement of those who actually do get fired or charged. As I wrote in the New Republic, when NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo was finally fired for his role in the 2014 death of Eric Garner, the citys police union immediately appealed for his reinstatement and threatened a work slowdown a classic union tactic that the cops used here to try and strong-arm a killer back onto the force. [more]
Opinion: Heres how police unions arent like the rest of the labor movement
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-how-police-unions-arent-like-the-rest-of-the-labor-movement-11598446468
In the wake of George Floyds death at the hands of a Minneapolis police officer, news reports have suggested that police unions bear some of the responsibility for the violence perpetrated against African-Americans.
Critics have assailed these unions for protecting officers who have abused their authority. Derek Chauvin, the former police officer facing second-degree murder charges for Floyds death, had nearly 20 complaints filed against him during his career but only received two letters of reprimand.
Many people who support labor unions in principle, who view them as a countervailing force against the power of employers, have only recently come to view police unions as problematic as entities that perpetuate a culture of racism and violence. [snip]
The strain between law enforcement and labor goes back to the origins of American unions in the mid 19th century. Workers formed unions to fight for wage increases, reduced working hours and humane working conditions.
For employers, this was an attack on the existing societal power structure. They enlisted the government as the defender of capital and property rights, and police officers were the foot soldiers who defended the status quo. [more]
___
"B-but cops need more protection and leeway because their jobs are so dangerous!" They are dangerous jobs, but the danger compared to many other jobs is overstated.
The 10 most dangerous jobs in America
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/27/the-10-most-dangerous-jobs-in-america-according-to-bls-data.html
Funny thing -- cops are not on this list.
eta -Apologies for the wall of text; hopefully bolding helped pick out the main points.
msongs
(67,430 posts)the mob
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,385 posts)Unfortunately, there's a big conservative streak among Building Trades unions, and they hold a lot of sway in some federations.
And breaking cop unions through policy, whether affiliated or not, is not the way to go.
crickets
(25,981 posts)As with policing itself, their union needs a big overhaul and reorganization. The big problem, as usual, is how.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,385 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)1) Police are needed to keep order and must not strike
2) As agents of the state, police cannot be allowed the power to influence public policy (making things illegal to drum up "business"
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)Ron Green
(9,823 posts)They dont fit into the world of labor in the same way as other workers.