Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn early 20th century California, forced sterilizations were an unnervingly widespread practice
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
CrimeReads
@CrimeReads
In early 20th century California, forced sterilizations were an unnervingly widespread, if mostly secret, practice. From Audrey Clare Farley (@AudreyCFarley).
How One Womans Forced Sterilization Led to a Mayhem Charge and Exposed a Secret World of Medical...
In January 1936, twenty-one-year-old Ann Cooper Hewitt, the well-known San Francisco heiress, called a press conference alongside her attorney and announced that she was suing her mother, Maryon Co
crimereads.com
9:30 AM · Apr 20, 2021
CrimeReads
@CrimeReads
In early 20th century California, forced sterilizations were an unnervingly widespread, if mostly secret, practice. From Audrey Clare Farley (@AudreyCFarley).
How One Womans Forced Sterilization Led to a Mayhem Charge and Exposed a Secret World of Medical...
In January 1936, twenty-one-year-old Ann Cooper Hewitt, the well-known San Francisco heiress, called a press conference alongside her attorney and announced that she was suing her mother, Maryon Co
crimereads.com
9:30 AM · Apr 20, 2021
https://crimereads.com/how-one-womans-forced-sterilization-led-to-a-mayhem-charge-and-exposed-a-secret-world-of-medical-atrocities/
Hewitt, the well-known San Francisco heiress, called a press conference alongside her attorney and announced that she was suing her mother, Maryon Cooper Hewitt. Ann claimed that she had been secretly sterilized at the behest of her mother, who paid two doctors to perform the procedure in order to prevent her from claiming an inheritance under her fathers estate. The allegations were explosive news and immediately caught the attention of San Francisco District Attorney, Matthew Brady. (Excerpted from The Unfit Heiress: The Tragic Life and Scandalous Sterilization of Ann Cooper Hewittby Audrey Clare Farley.)
___________________________________
Shortly after Anns press conference in San Francisco, the district attorney got wind of her case. At first, Matthew Bradys eyes widened as he read the girls accusations in the San Francisco Examiner. Then his mind began to turn. Here was an opportunity to charge four individuals (Mrs. Cooper Hewitt, the doctor who ordered the operation, the doctor who performed it, and the alienist) with a felony not often encountered outside of legal textbooks: mayhem. This criminal charge was reserved for cases involving the act of disabling or disfiguring an individual, and it was punishable by up to fourteen years in prison.
Brady immediately conferred with his assistant, August Fourtner, and Police Inspector George Engler about the matter. The groups cursory research revealed that over ten thousand individuals in the state had been sterilized in public institutions since California had passed a law authorizing sterilization in 1909. There existed no record of the number of sterilizations performed in private practice, though some legal experts predicted the number was large. The law didnt authorize these procedures, meaning that there could be hundredsor even thousandsof individuals like Ann, whose rights had been violated.
The most frequent techniques for sterilization were vasectomy and salpingectomy, which Ann had undergone. Castration and spaying were generally avoided, as these procedures didnt merely render individuals incapable of producing childrenthey desexualized them. This last fact might present a conundrum for the San Francisco prosecutors, Brady realized. Mayhem cases hinged on proving that ones body had been maimed, rendered useless, or substantially changed in physical character. What if defendants argued that the primary purpose of sex was pleasure, rather than procreation, and therefore that the operation did not amount to an act of mayhem?
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 495 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In early 20th century California, forced sterilizations were an unnervingly widespread practice (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Apr 2021
OP
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)1. Wow. This is fascinating and terrifyng as well.
Interesting reading that's for sure.