General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI saw a comment elsewhere that Chauvin showed no emotion when the verdict was announced..
My first thought was that he did not appear to be capable of actual human emotion, Not at the scene of the crime and not in court.
Others some suggested that he knew he was convicted before it was announced..
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Very unlikely.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)His behavior is likely a combination of internal dispositional factors and having been placed in a position of authority with little to no expectation of accountability. Personality tests are largely ineffective at screening for potential abusive/sadistic behavior because the job itself encourages sadistic/abusive behavior in people who would otherwise not exhibit those personality traits.
Here, in 2021, what should be more than apparent to anyone paying even the remotest attention to police violence in this country is that the problem is not individual officers with psychological conditions, and no amount of punishing individuals is going to make things right. The problem is policing itself, and in particular, the culture of police offices across the country.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)I presume you are refering to Zimbardo's Stanford experiment, which has been publicly exposed as a fraud.
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/2019-letexier.pdf
While I agree with you on the systemic issues with the culture of policing, what types of persons would be attracted to or remain in such a hateful, racist, authoritarian system?
Those with anti-social personality disorder, or strong traits.
Prisons are full of people with this pathology.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)some emotion
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I don't think he ever expected to be convicted - just like he never expected to be held accountable for grinding his knee into George Floyd's neck as he stared down the witnesses and dared them to do anything about it.
Dawgman49
(226 posts)I noticed as well as the judge read the verdicts & shortly after his eyes were darting vertically , almost involuntary
very strange...I do believe he was expecting a hung jury(thanks defense), and was in shock...I think a change of clothes and some solitude will help
TwilightZone
(25,473 posts)It seemed that he was going back and forth between the judge and the jurors who were responding to the judge's inquiries.
mcar
(42,371 posts)and Barr would let it go through. He was probably cussing Barr out in his mind as the verdicts were read.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)OnDoutside
(19,968 posts)pandr32
(11,605 posts)No doubt he was afraid for himself. He isn't remorseful, but he is concerned for his own ass.
Leith
(7,813 posts)Other than that and the darting eyes, no emotion.
Bev54
(10,067 posts)I don't think he expected it.
shrike3
(3,728 posts)katmondoo
(6,457 posts)Deuxcents
(16,303 posts)He showed no emotion while his knee was on the neck of George Floyd for 9 plus minutes. He may be devoid of emotion. I have no mercy for him
ecstatic
(32,727 posts)Isn't he like the first white cop in Minnesota to ever be held accountable? He was convinced a racist trumper would run cover for him. I think his attorney thought that too, based on the ridiculous defense he put up.
a kennedy
(29,696 posts)kcr
(15,318 posts)with his eyebrows slightly knit looked like utter disbelief. Is this really happening? He didn't see that coming.
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)I'm sure his lawyer prepared him but the way he looked around was fear.
stillcool
(32,626 posts)all kinds of stuff to blunt emotions.
TwilightZone
(25,473 posts)Probably on the advice/direction of his attorney. That's pretty common.
Jim__
(14,083 posts)He was always "taking notes."
I thought the best shot he had was if he could testify and convince the jury that he did not intend to kill George Floyd.
I can't help but wonder about his personality.
WA-03 Democrat
(3,054 posts)Him opening his mouth didn't go that well in their plans and they took a hard pass. He is awful but that is who he is.
TwilightZone
(25,473 posts)It's a pretty common practice for defense attorneys to advise their clients not to show emotion, etc., during the trial.
I think it's also very likely that he was advised not to testify. Cross-examination would have been brutal.
Solly Mack
(90,779 posts)the judge, or someone, anyone, really, to say just foolin'.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)AZ8theist
(5,487 posts)Yes, his eyes darted back and forth, but..
As soon as the word "GUILTY" was spoken....NOTHING. NO REACTION.
I would have hung my head in despair or started crying. But NO EMOTION. NOTHING.
I believe the man is a sociopath. He will go right on killing others while in prison. And think nothing of it....
WarGamer
(12,463 posts)He's been prepared for this day.
SunImp
(2,224 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)But I don't know if it's sound to make deep extensive judgements on a 5 second block of pre-planned behavior.
In any event, you can bet he had rehearsed mentally what his reaction will be tens of thousands of times, based on a guilty or not-guilty verdict.
To me, people reactions to news when they DON"T expect to get news is much more genuine.
Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)to avoid federal civil suits. Barr said no.
He knew he would be convicted.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,285 posts)I wondered if he was married, and if she was ever in court. The broadcast of the trial never panned beyond him and his attorney and the view from behind were assistants of counsel I believe. Couldn't tell if he had family or friends present.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)his wife filed for divorce around the same time he was charged, maybe even before the charges in the Floyd murder. It was mentioned in the articles that it looked really fishy. I recently saw that they are both facing some serious shit with the Feds/IRS. His life is fucked, and he brought it all on himself.
Justice is a mofo when it catches up...
msfiddlestix
(7,285 posts)BoringUsername
(142 posts)I hate it when people make assumptions like this. Think about people grieving a death of a loved one. No one does it the same way and being more emotional isn't more right. I honestly wouldn't care if this guy was more emotional in the trial. Some people are emotional for selfish reasons. Some people are good actors and they even fake emotions. Being emotional isn't the same as being sorry and it doesn't change the situation. All that matters is that he committed a crime and he will be imprisoned for it.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,394 posts)BoringUsername
(142 posts)myccrider
(484 posts)People vary by culture and individual differences wrt how they deal with strong emotions. And threats to personal safety and survival almost always elicit strong emotions.
The whole "dont judge a book..." thing applies here. He was a cop for a long time, he learned to suppress certain reactions. Hes a male raised in American culture, he learned to suppress reactions that could show weakness.
I wasnt surprised he remained relatively stoic. Bet his internal voice was screaming and gibbering, though.
BoringUsername
(142 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 21, 2021, 11:29 AM - Edit history (2)
Sometimes I get emotionally burnt out so I just can't get worked up about something that someone else might get really upset about. It's because I felt like that already too many times before and it just wore me out. Showing the strong emotion also sometimes only seems to make me more upset.
Anyhow, I don't see how speculation on his emotional state is helpful. It seems like people are trying make connections between murderers and lack of displayed emotions, like that's what you'd expect from a murderer. The two things are not related.
myccrider
(484 posts)An example is that I was so prepared for this trial to end the way so many have ended, with the jury hung or giving the cop the benefit of the doubt, that I couldnt react with joy, at first, to the good news of the guilty verdict. Happily, that only lasted a few moments, but had you seen my face in those moments, one could have concluded that I didnt care.
There are lots of reasons that people outwardly react differently to similar stimuli.
I also think people are falling into the error, that we all are vulnerable to, of expecting evil to look and act obviously evil. IRL it doesnt always work that way, though. Most of us understand that intellectually, but emotionally is another story.
canetoad
(17,175 posts)Is the demeanor of Lindy Chamberlain, before, during and after her trial.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_Chamberlain-Creighton
Of all the criticism aimed at Lindy, the most virulent was that she, "Showed no emotion."
Solomon
(12,319 posts)trial, i don't see how he could have ever been surprised by the verdict.
The best part for me was the fact that he had to sit there and actually see what he did, all the evidence against him. I'm sure he didn't think it was all that bad what he done until he saw the evidence and heard all the witnesses. That was pure schadenfreud for me.
FakeNoose
(32,718 posts)Chauvin and his lawyer were close by as the jury deliberated. I believe they never left the courthouse, or if they did leave if was only briefly. That indicates they knew the jury would have a quick deliberation, and most likely it would be "guilty."
I say that only because a "not guilty" verdict would mean one or several of the jury were not convinced and needed to review the testimony thoroughly. Often the jury will ask the judge for clarification on a certain point, if they should be hung up on something. So the quick agreement on the verdict tells the defense what to expect.
Chauvin knew that the entire thing was being televised live, and he wasn't caught surprised by the verdict. Why should he react emotionally, and give the TV cameras something to show on the 6 o'clock news?
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)From a neurolinguistic programming perspective, his eyes were darting around like he was furiously trying to search his memory banks for any other time in his life when he was held accountable for his despicable behavior, and he was coming up completely empty.
His expression reminded me of Gollum's face for an instant in "The Return of the King" when he realizes he just jumped into a fucking volcano.
Sunsky
(1,737 posts)murdering Floyd- NONE. Flat affect. I often wonder if he's on medication or has an undisclosed disorder. He exhibited little to no emotion throughout the court proceedings, as well as during, and after the reading of the verdict.
Yes, I believe he knew he was going to be convicted. When they were asked to stand for the jury (before the reading of the verdict), he had his hands behind him. He did not do that throughout the trial. Some say he did that unconsciously, but I believe he did it consciously to signal that he was done play-acting and he knew his fate.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Sunsky
(1,737 posts)He had displayed emotion, but if you analyze the video you will notice that this was his look throughout. This is Chauvin's everyday face. It is the same look he gave the bystanders while he was murdering Floyd. That's the same look he had when he took off his mask to garner sympathy from the jury. One person on HLN commented that taking off his mask served him no good and that he should've kept on his mask because he doesn't have a sympathetic look. He just stares with no emotion.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)No doubt he could already feel their judgement upon him long before the verdict was read. I don't think there was much surprise factor. He already knew he was fucked. Especially since the video speaks for itself and his former employer helped dig his grave.
Towlie
(5,327 posts)
←
If so his lawyer was probably wrong, but Chauvin could have been convinced and therefore not surprised or depressed.
On the other hand, photos of him in the act don't show any emotion either.
haele
(12,673 posts)If he's a sociopath, there was no reason in his mind to even consider he did anything wrong. If a sociopath, he also believes he can handle or get out of anything thrown his way because sociopaths think they are above everyone else and are bulletproof.
Haele
roamer65
(36,747 posts)...and it is always someone elses fault.
Sunsky
(1,737 posts)I don't like when people are diagnosed without a thorough assessment but I do think of some sort of personality disorder when I observe him.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(515 posts)His eyes were looking around in the same way: both before and after the judgement.
If ever an example of no change in behavior after hearing, "Guilty", this was it.
At the conclusion, he nodded to the judge in a show of respect.
Mr.Bill
(24,317 posts)was the judge remanding him into custody immediately.