Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsD.C. to Pay $1.6 Million to Settle Claims from 2017 Inauguration Day
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
ACLU of the District of Columbia
@ACLU_DC
BREAKING: D.C. will pay $1.6 million to settle two lawsuits filed by the ACLU-DC and @_LightLaw on behalf of journalists, legal observers, and demonstrators who protested the inauguration of President Trump in January 2017. More here:
D.C. to Pay $1.6 Million to Settle Claims from 2017 Inauguration Day
Settlements Resolve Lawsuits Alleging False Arrests and Excessive Force FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: media@acludc.org
acludc.org
7:06 AM · Apr 26, 2021
ACLU of the District of Columbia
@ACLU_DC
BREAKING: D.C. will pay $1.6 million to settle two lawsuits filed by the ACLU-DC and @_LightLaw on behalf of journalists, legal observers, and demonstrators who protested the inauguration of President Trump in January 2017. More here:
D.C. to Pay $1.6 Million to Settle Claims from 2017 Inauguration Day
Settlements Resolve Lawsuits Alleging False Arrests and Excessive Force FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: media@acludc.org
acludc.org
7:06 AM · Apr 26, 2021
https://www.acludc.org/en/press-releases/dc-pay-16-million-settle-claims-2017-inauguration-day-demonstrations
WASHINGTON - The ACLU of the District of Columbia, the Law Office of Jeffrey Light, and the District of Columbia today filed court papers stating the District will pay $1.6 million to settle two demonstrators rights lawsuitsone brought by the ACLU-DC and the other by Jeffrey Light. The two lawsuits, filed on behalf of journalists, legal observers, and demonstrators who protested the inauguration of President Trump in January 2017, charged that former Metropolitan Police Department Police Chief Peter Newsham and more than two dozen MPD officers engaged in or supervised constitutional violations including mass arrests of demonstrators without probable cause, unlawful conditions of confinement for detainees, and/or use of excessive force.
I came with my son, then 10 years old, to the nations capital on Inauguration Day 2017 to exercise my constitutional rights and teach him about the power of protest, said Gwen Frisbie-Fulton of North Carolina, who along with her son is a plaintiff in the ACLU-DC case. Because of the wanton and brutal conduct of the D.C. police, we ended up fleeing through a cloud of pepper spray for doing nothing but chanting and holding signs. So the real lesson in how our Constitution works had to be this lawsuit, showing that there can be consequences when law enforcement abuses its power.
The two lawsuits charged that, in response to vandalism and property damage caused by a small number of protestors, MPD officers rounded up, or kettled, more than 200 protestersincluding many who had broken no lawsand detained them without access to food, water, or restrooms for up to 16 hours. Officers also deployed pepper spray, flash-bang grenades, concussion grenades, and stingballs explosive devices that release smoke, rubber pellets, and a chemical irritant within a radius of approximately 50 feetagainst protesters and others both on the street and inside the kettle, without warning and in circumstances where there was no threat of harm to officers or the public. The lawsuits asserted that MPD officers violated the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, and D.C. law. Along with Frisbie-Fulton and her son, the ACLU-DC represents demonstrators Elizabeth Lagesse and Milo Gonzalez, photojournalist Shay Horse, and legal observer Judah Ariel. The other lawsuit is a class action filed on behalf of more than 100 demonstrators.
"MPDs unconstitutional guilt-by-association policing and excessive force, including the use of chemical weapons, not only injured our clients physically but also chilled their speech and the speech of countless others who wished to exercise their First Amendment rights but feared an unwarranted assault by D.C. police, said Scott Michelman, Legal Director, ACLU of the District of Columbia. The contrast between the over-policing of constitutionally protected speech on Inauguration Day 2017 and the under-policing of a violent invasion of the U.S. Capitol earlier this year starkly demonstrates law enforcements institutional biases. A diverse group of protestors with a left-wing message was subjected to a mass arrest without cause, whereas armed white insurrectionists with a right-wing message stormed Congress, and the police let them walk away.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 635 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post