General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans are setting a tax trap for Biden
You wont hear them say, lets raise the gas tax, exactly. Theres a code phrase: user fees. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, for instance, says Republicans will support $600 billion in infrastructure spending, as long as user fees cover the cost. Were happy to look for traditional infrastructure pay-fors, which means the users participate, McConnell said in Louisville on May 3.
If Republicans controlled Congress, its extremely unlikely theyd raise user fees or impose new ones to pay for an infrastructure plan. The federal gasoline tax, which is supposed to cover the costs of the national highway system, is a classic user fee because people who buy gasdriverspay into the fund that maintains the roads they drive on. But the gas tax has been stuck at 18.4 center per gallon since 1993, and its now too low to cover all the costs its supposed to. President Trump supposedly wanted a big infrastructure plan, and his fellow Republicans controlled Congress during the first two years of his presidency. Yet they never mounted a serious infrastructure plan, let alone new user fees to pay for it.
So why do Republicans favor user fees now? Because they would force Biden to break a core campaign promise, damaging him politically. Biden pledged not to raise taxes on households earning less than $400,000 per year, and any user fee applied broadly to the public would violate that pledge. User fees are actually a sensible and proven way to pay for big projects, yet Biden, for better or worse, has effectively ruled them out as a funding source for his ambitious plans.
Everybody in Washington knows this is the game. Virtually no Republicans would vote to raise the federal gas tax, if it actually came up for a vote, and no Democrat would vote to put Biden in the position of breaking a campaign promise. Biden would veto such a bill if it landed on his desk. Yet Rs and Ds are pretending to negotiate as if Republicans would really raise the gas tax and Democrats might be open to the idea.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/republicans-are-setting-a-tax-trap-for-biden-184020085.html
arlyellowdog
(866 posts)regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)...which are per-mile charges for any driver on any road, which would be the same no matter how fuel-efficient one's vehicle is. You would have to put an RF tag ("surveillance!!!" ) on your car, and there would be a system in place to track you every time you drove. At the end of the month/year/whenever, you'd be sent a bill for the miles you traveled.
Amazingly, there are some Democrats who don't think this is a bad idea, either, even though it seems clear it's designed specifically to spur outrage against Biden and his party should they try to adopt it, and make it a lot easier for Republicans to recapture power on a "less taxes, more personal freedom" platform.
BGBD
(3,282 posts)It's like something a republican would make up that we were going to do.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)regressive...fix the tax code...start by ending trumps tax bullshit law.
OAITW r.2.0
(24,504 posts)Say, $300BB/year for security services rendered, getting their product to market? Seems fair. Pass to the consumer and watch the switch to battery.
Bev54
(10,053 posts)administration is working to reduce fossil fuels which would then be reducing income. This is not a trap that Biden will fall into. I also do not see them go for the user fees either because who is paying the user fees? Not the 1% that is for sure. If the repubs think this is a big trap, then they are dumber than a bag of rocks.
Midnight Writer
(21,768 posts)WHITT
(2,868 posts)Biden mentioned he was open to the STUPID idea being pushed by Senator Coons, to take what the Repubs want to do on infrastructure, like $600b to $800b, then come back for the rest with only Dems.
VERY BAD IDEA.
If he does this, he loses his leverage. How will he get Manchin & Sinema to go along? No. He needs to do an LBJ. You want your bridges repaired, your water systems upgraded, your broadband expanded, then you need to vote for the whole package, or you can go home and explain to your constituents why you voted against all the stuff they WANT.
LudwigPastorius
(9,155 posts)Oh, you mean, like, Amazon and every other mega corporation that uses the highways, bridges, ports and countless other public facilities to hawk their wares and rake in revenue? ...and the 1% whose stock portfolios burgeon with the profits generated by that usage?
That's who Biden wants to tax, you asshat.
arlyellowdog
(866 posts)In his press conference, President Biden clearly gave all the reasons why he and all of us need to oppose these taxes. How is it a trap?
sanatanadharma
(3,707 posts)Why is it so hard to understand that we all benefit from roads and bridges that we never personally cross.
Commerce moves over roads; everyone uses the benefits of roads.
One's favorite brand of toilet paper on the empty shelf or the gas at the now empty station arrived on a road to, or passing by the merchant.
Taxes are civilized user-fees for the benefits of living in a society evolved beyond nasty, mean, brutish, and short beastly lives.
Taxes are repayment of previous benefits and should be levied on all; each paying commensurate with the wealth they accrue.