General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSurprise! CDC reversal on masks leaves states, businesses scrambling
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/surprise-cdc-reversal-masks-leaves-states-businesses-scrambling/story?id=77691769""Americans are feeling incredible whiplash," one health expert said"
"Governors said they werent briefed in advance on the plan, despite 24 states and the District of Columbia having some sort of state-wide mask mandate in place at the time of the announcement."
"We were as surprised as anyone by the CDCs announcement learning about it through the press," said Republican Gov. Chris Sununu of New Hampshire, calling CDC messaging in recent months "inconsistent, convoluted, and ever changing."
"Several health experts also said were caught off guard, assuming new mask recommendations would come when more Americans were fully vaccinated. Nearly 36% of the U.S. population is vaccinated, and the pace of shots has declined.
"I thought it would be prudent to wait until everyone who is willing (ages 12 and up) has had an opportunity to be fully vaccinated, around July 1," said Linsey Marr, a virus transmission expert at Virginia Tech.
Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and visiting professor of health policy and management at the George Washington University's Milken School of Public Health, tweeted: "Im still stunned at the CDC decision."
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Considering in most states we have less than 50% vaccinated, it makes no sense.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Biophilic
(3,666 posts)probably deserve it. Where ever I went today people were still masked up. I think it's going to take sometime for the CDC to recover its reputation.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Just ridiculously irresponsible without data on known variants, let alone anything else that might be forthcoming.
Just does not feel like the solid, responsible governance we have come to rely on from Joe & Kamala's team.
Biophilic
(3,666 posts)tread where about 1/4 of the people were saying they were going ahead with no masks for one reason or another. I found it interesting that people on DU were arguing so hard to forego masks. Seems pretty silly at this point. We've spent over a year trying to stay safe. Why give it up so suddenly? It is the first thing this administration has "said" that I've felt uneasy about.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)The whole thing seems "off" to me.
I'm not a paranoid person, nor a germophobe - never have had a flu shot in my life, but this is very different and I, too, am troubled by the high percentage of folks who are seemingly so gung ho to ditch their masks.
Feeling like Alice in Wonderland, yet again...
liberal_mama
(1,495 posts)Something seems very off with this abrupt and bizarre change. I wonder what's really behind the decision to go with these new guidelines.
RegularJam
(914 posts)Thats a part of it. Im assuming the CDC needs to work better with states but it seems as though when new guidelines are written they become public.
The difficulty with the mask aspect is its virtually a no mask policy. Employees can not be the front lines of this foolish mask war any longer and such a policy is a no win for them.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Pathetic, imo. Very disappointing, and has me wondering how many dumpites are hanging around CDC.
These CDC folks are supposed to follow the science, not stick their heads in the sand to please maskholes and science deniers!
RegularJam
(914 posts)With anti-maskers. I think its based in science and reflects how people should act. Thats how they have to do it. The fact that their guidelines wont be followed is a societal issue, not one of the CDC.
I dont find the CDC to be pathetic as you and many others on all sides do. I believe they are doing well, not perfect.