General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSubpoena Issued in Probe of Trump Ambassador Pick
https://politicalwire.com/2021/05/16/subpoena-issued-in-probe-of-trump-ambassador-pick/Subpoena Issued in Probe of Trump Ambassador Pick
May 16, 2021 at 7:08 am EDT By Taegan Goddard
The case appears to focus on the Republican National Committee and its two senior leaders, and possibly members of Congress.
CurtEastPoint
(18,650 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)Chainfire
(17,549 posts)and bet it was about selling offices to the highest bidder. The the Republican version of doing good business.
LudwigPastorius
(9,155 posts)Every move by Trump is transactional.
If the DOJ were to go back and listen to Trumps phone calls, theyd probably find dozens of instances of graft and bribery.
But don't parties do that to some extent? Not sell it outright but big donors and those who deserve a reward?
tanyev
(42,566 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)LudwigPastorius
(9,155 posts)There's no doubt in my mind that Trump used the power of the office of the president to illegally generate a big cash flow, from domestic and foreign sources.
Prosecutors need to review all of Trump's phone calls, and emails, and find the offshore accounts where he stashed everything.
ShazamIam
(2,574 posts)From the link via outline.com
According to the grand jury reference number listed on the documents, the investigation was opened last year before Trump left the White House.
Weeks after Manchester withdrew his nomination, emails surfaced indicating that Manchester was at the center of a possible pay-to-play arrangement with the Republican National Committee.
In November 2019, CBS News disclosed exchanges between McDaniel and Manchester that implied the San Diego developer would make additional contributions after winning confirmation.
Manchester told the Union-Tribune at the time that the emails were misconstrued.
It wasnt what everyone is trying to make of it, he said then. They are trying to make it a pay-for-play, which it is not. I never in fact guaranteed to do anything.
FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)(link) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Manchester
Manchester has long been involved in conservative politics and with the Republican Party. In late 2019, the Republican National Committee (RNC) cut all ties with Manchester after CBS News obtained emails between Manchester, Ronna McDaniel, and GOP senate staffers in which Manchester appeared to be engaged in a pay-to-play scheme. The San Diego Union-Tribune reported in May 2021 that a federal grand jury had issued a subpoena in a criminal investigation into his nomination as ambassador, apparently focused on the RNC, McDaniel and RNC co-chair Tommy Hicks, and possibly members of Congress.[6]
- more at link -
These slimy Repukes are like whack-a-mole, am I right?
getagrip_already
(14,764 posts)he is hosed if that is his defense. The gubberment doesn't need to come up with a signed contract that details the transaction.
They don't even need to prove it was ever completed. Not being appointed does not mean he broke no laws.
All they gotta show is there was discussion and coordination. Buh buh falicia.
RockRaven
(14,972 posts)Stephen Calk. He's been indicted for bribery and going to trial in June of this year.
This sounds similar. Hopefully McDaniel is ensnared.
TeamProg
(6,139 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,564 posts)Finding that the Republicans were not, in fact, open for business must have left a bad taste in his mouth. I hope.