General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Lies Cops Tell and the Lies We Tell About Cops
https://newrepublic.com/article/162510/cops-lie-public-safety-defund-the-police(snip)
Cops lie about dangers they face. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, police officer ranks sixteenth among the 30 most dangerous jobs. No one should die at work, and by number of deaths per 100,000, sanitation workers and landscapers work much more dangerous jobs.
(snip)
Cops lie to make arrests. They may lie about why they stop someone. Many traffic stops are pretextual, meaning the traffic violation is the entry point as an officer intends to gather information or conduct a search. Daunte Wright was killed by a police officer in a Minneapolis suburb in April. The pretext for his stop: expired registration tags.
(snip)
Cops lie about what they must do. In fact, cops dont have to do anything (as the Supreme Court affirmed in 2005). The irreducible essence of policing is not law enforcement itself but discretion over which laws to enforce, over how to achieve order. Discretion is the ability to decide in the moment whether to act, and how. Will arrest or citation solve a situation of disorder? What about bullets or tear gas? Cops emphasize that they are forced to make split-second decisions. That may be true, but racism often predetermines the outcome. Testilying creates the post-hoc rationalization for discretionary decisions made on the street to fashion order and enforce control.
Walleye
(31,028 posts)marble falls
(57,112 posts)four year old - in Provo, Utah. Most of them cheated on their wives, the few that graduated from my class in HS seemed more likely to end up in prison as assaulters, liars and petty thieves before they joined the force, and seemed more likely to be confined after they joined the Akron PD.
My BiL once handcuffed another BiL to a dining room table for an hour as a joke and refused to release him getting angry at the whole family for not being able to take a joke. The only reason he released him was someone else went and got a pair of hydraulic rod cutters.
jaxexpat
(6,837 posts)marble falls
(57,112 posts)snowybirdie
(5,229 posts)good to generalize so broadly.
marble falls
(57,112 posts)snowybirdie
(5,229 posts)generalizing. I try to dig deeper into a situation before making decisions. All or the amorphous "they" are generalizations. Good day.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)There seems to be a culture there. Almost every single one of them was a complete prick.
When I meet one that seems to be a good person I will start to change my mind. But by and large I can only go off of my personal experiences with them.
Rebl2
(13,523 posts)two I knew kind of, cheated on their wives and the wives divorced them. They just came across as jerks who likely lied knowing their personalities. I still hold out hope there are good police officers out their doing good work and deeds in their communities-my surrounding communities.
marble falls
(57,112 posts)... demonstrate any absolute statements from me.
Is it your contention that there is an acceptable, inevitable amount of violence and dishonesty being perpetrated by the police or that while there is an unacceptable amount of violence it's only perpetrated a very few bad apples? Because both are wrong.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)We should dig down deeply into each individual situation before saying that cops lie.
In the meantime, we should give cops the benefit of the doubt and assume that they DON'T lie, right?
Oh, wait a minute. That's a generalization, too, isn't it?
Towlie
(5,324 posts)
←
Very funny! You made the broad generalization that it's never good to generalize so broadly.
snowybirdie
(5,229 posts)not that clever before my morning coffee. Just hate to see folks hating an entire class of people because of their occupation. Its so Republican!
Towlie
(5,324 posts)
←
It's just like choosing to be a Republican. Even if you approve of what that group pretends to stand for you should be aware of what they actually stand for, and if you join them then it's fair to presume that you're aligned with what they actually stand for.
Fortunately, I very seldom have to interact with a cop.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)multigraincracker
(32,690 posts)I give him or her credit. It's more likely a cop opens fire on an unarmed man who is reaching for his wallet when asked for his ID.
In one case they claim they feared for their safety and in the other they say they feared for her safety. Can't have it both ways.
JT45242
(2,281 posts)He described it this way --
One third of cops really want to serve and protect. They get into the job because they think that they can help make communities better.
One third of cops really just want to work 25 years and get a pension. They never want to use their gun. They just want to go their job the right way and at the end of the day have a middle class life style. Often these guys take extra shifts for security at sporting events and other venues because it is easy money. It's really just a job. ( I always thought he underestimated this percentage, but now I think he is right)
One third of cops like the power they have over people. He says they were bullies. They were jocks who were worshipped in high school. They like instilling fear and being vindictive. (I always thought that he overestimated this by at least double, as I thought most people are generally good -- but now I think he was right).
I lived next door to one of the last kind of cops before he got a divorce. All the students where I taught knew him -- that's the guy that harasses you, if you go into the neighboring suburb where he was a cop. They all said he goes easy on the jocks, unless they were black because he had a real mean racist streak. Someone said, though I never confirmed that he lost his starting position to a black kid.
When he got promoted, he said the hardest thing was to try to keep the last group in line because the first groups were either oblivious or didn't want to rock the boat.
Maybe if we did a better job with psychological screening and training we could get it to where it likely should be -- 50% in the first group and 50% in the second group with no bullies. That's where they ought to be spending money on police training and screening rather than tanks, assault weapons, etc. Let's get the right kind of people in the job and they won't need assault weapons -- other countries like us (Canada, the UK, Australia, etc.) don't need cops armed like army rangers or navy seals.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Jedi Guy
(3,193 posts)I worked with cops for a couple years as a dispatcher, and that assessment squares pretty well with my memory.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)Answer: All three.
Solomon
(12,311 posts)misanthrope
(7,418 posts)The sway that last third holds over the other two-thirds is what does so much damage.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)ChoppinBroccoli
(3,784 posts)Several years ago, a couple of defense attorneys from our local bar managed to get into a Police Academy training course. They actually got to sit in a classroom with a bunch of people training to become cops and audit the class. After taking the class, they came back and reported to us what they learned. One of the things they learned was that there was an entire COURSE on how to lie in the police report, and how to lie on the stand in order to get the conviction.
Ever wonder why EVERY police report sounds the same, and contains the same buzzwords and catchphrases? Because they're trained that they need to say certain things in those reports in order to get the conviction.
So whenever I hear people talk about how a cop's main job is to protect the public, I just scoff. A cop's main job is to CONVICT the public. At all costs.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)order just for fun.
misanthrope
(7,418 posts)I've known a lot of lawyers who lie as well. A lot.
Not saying that includes you, specifically, but the idea of an attorney casting aspersion about cops' propensity for falsehoods is loaded with irony.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)saddling someone with a criminal record. In a system where a cops testimony is, for the most part, considered inherently credible their lies cause ordinary citizens a tremendous amount of personal damage. Dash and body cams has help to even the playing field but cops often turn off the sound or position their patrol car so as to interfere with the recording leaving the court or jury in a position of having to determine whose version of events is more credible the cops or the accused. In a bench trial most judges overwhelming automatically side with the cops. You have a better shot with a jury but its still an uphill battle owing to the credibility jurors place upon a cops testimony.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)And I'll bet you don't know many lawyers who lie in court or in pleadings
And, unlike cops, lawyers are not just taken at their word. They are consistently balanced out and regularly challenged by opposing counsel and the judge - and are bound by various canons of ethics that can result in sanctions such as suspension and disbarment if caught lying to the court.
Not even close to being the same thing
FYI, I'm a lawyer who knows and says that cops all the time. Are you calling MY credibility into question?
And if you want to go there, perhaps we should bring up the relative credibility of journalists ...
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)It takes a good cop to stop a bad cop.
We just need more "good" cops.
scarletlib
(3,415 posts)It is by David Simon, creator of The Wire. The book came out in 1991 and recounted his year spent with the Baltimore Police Department. At the time he was a reporter with the Baltimore Sun.
Its a fun and interesting read. He is a great writer. One thing he wrote in the book was the cops telling him what they called their court appearances in criminal cases:
Testilying. Sort of says it all, doesnt it?
I read this book shortly after publication. I have never forgotten that phrase.