Larry Sabato has a brilliant idea...

[brooklynite]

Link to tweet

[dsc]

1. would the current GOP accept this?

doubtful. Honestly at this point, I prefer a house committee.

[SoonerPride]

3. They would bargain and barter and negotiate and get all they wanted and then vote against it

fuck them and their delay tactics and treason

[BGBD]

6. They wouldn't

Get a say. Hence the executive order.

[brooklynite]

7. A Presidential Commission doesn't require a Congressional vote.

[bottomofthehill]

2. I could live with that right up to the private funding.

This is a government task. It should not be funded with private money, no one either right or left should be able to fund and have any outcome on the outcome.

[spooky3]

4. Agree. This is a govt function and members need to be

Respected, credible, and accountable to voters. I mean no disrespect to either prior president or to members they might select.

[The Magistrate]

5. Damn, Sir! That Is Smooth...

[Mr. Ected]

8. Why would we empower a war criminal to evaluate this attack on our nation?

I'm sorry, but time hasn't softened my disdain for that man. He's spent the past 13 years attempting to rehabilitate his image and it looks like even some die-hard Democrats have been taken for suckers.

Hey, why not let Donald Trump head the 2042 commission on ethics in government? That's the ticket!

[MOMFUDSKI]

9. You said a mouthful there and

I could not agree MORE. Thanks

[uponit7771]

10. +1

[Captain Zero]

11. If we can have private audits of elections then

We can have a presidential commission with private funding. Somebody start the GoFundMe.

[WarGamer]

12. Who gets to be on the #IraqWarHoax commission?

Oh and fuck shrub.

Worst POTUS ever.

[FakeNoose]

13. The only good reason for appointing Dubya

... is that he would do everything in his power to see that Chump ends up in prison.

I don't subscribe to Dubya's efforts to whitewash his own 2 terms, not by any means. But it would be helpful to use him in a way that Repukes might find acceptable.