Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWant to know about the terrible decision not to investigate Barr and move to sanction or disbar him?
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
Norman Ornstein
@NormOrnstein
Want to know about the terrible decision not to investigate Bill Barr and move to sanction or disbar him? Read from one who knows, Michal Frisch:
https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2021/05/i-am-advised-that-the-district-of-columbia-office-of-disciplinary-counsel-notified-host-of-attorneys-including-several-forme.html
8:47 PM · Jun 10, 2021
Norman Ornstein
@NormOrnstein
Want to know about the terrible decision not to investigate Bill Barr and move to sanction or disbar him? Read from one who knows, Michal Frisch:
https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2021/05/i-am-advised-that-the-district-of-columbia-office-of-disciplinary-counsel-notified-host-of-attorneys-including-several-forme.html
8:47 PM · Jun 10, 2021
https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2021/05/i-am-advised-that-the-district-of-columbia-office-of-disciplinary-counsel-notified-host-of-attorneys-including-several-forme.html
I am advised that the District of Columbia Office of Disciplinary Counsel notified the host of attorneys (including several former Bar Presidents) that it would not entertain their complaint filed against the former Attorney General of the United States because the persons who had filed it lack "personal knowledge" of the events at issue.
I was not in any way surprised as ODC investigations are confidential unless and until formal charges are filed.
I fully expected the complainants to not be treated as persons entitled to information about the existence or progress of any investigation by ODC.
I also fully expect that this complaint has been or will be firmly deposited in a circular file and that the reasoning for the decision will never come to light.
But the letter from ODC contains this disturbing sentence
In general, this Office will not intervene in matters that are currently and publicly being discussed in the national political arena
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1080 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Want to know about the terrible decision not to investigate Barr and move to sanction or disbar him? (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jun 2021
OP
Huh? So if you are a mukity muk attorney/politician they won't investigate...
Thomas Hurt
Jun 2021
#1
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)1. Huh? So if you are a mukity muk attorney/politician they won't investigate...
discipline or disbar them no matter what they do? Not surprising though
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)2. So sad...
being a lawyer used to be a respected profession.
Trump ruins EVERYTHING.
RockRaven
(14,972 posts)3. There's an old saw that attorneys ONLY ever get disbarred for mishandling clients' money...
And since Bloaty Bill didn't touch The Dotard's cash, he's not gonna get spanked by the one-R Bar.
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)4. as someone else put it: "The Hits Just Keep Coming".....
which is more to the point than me repeating my reaction of "this is outrageous"....