General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWatch Joy Reid takedown the architect of the critical race theory culture war in epic debate
Sarah K. Burris
June 23, 2021
MSNBC host Joy Reid took on Christopher Rufo, the think-tank "scholar" who claimed to be an expert on race because he works as a "scholar" at a conservative think tank. Speaking Wednesday, Reid got him to confess that he's neither an expert in race nor in law, which is where the idea of critical race theory is generally taught.
Rufo claimed that Reid was attacking him on air, which she corrected, saying that she was doing nothing more than reading the quote from his own documents.
Reid began by asking at what point "critical race theory" was invented, and he didn't know, saying sometime in the 1980s or 1990s. Reid cited the Harvard University paper in which it was first mentioned in 1981 by Professor Derrick Bell, who died in 2011.
She cited Rufo's "documentary" on critical race theory that cite professors or professorial types who he admits are academics who he claims are replacing equality with equity, which is a conservative charge Reid said she's been hearing since she was in high school. "To ending individual property rights and even to committing reverse genocide or calling for reverse genocide."
snip
https://www.rawstory.com/joy-reid-debates-critical-race-theory-culture-warrior/
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)Itself an outgrowth of the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School of social and political theory.
CLT and CRT are intertwined.
underpants
(182,823 posts)She was ready for everything from him. Very well done.
rickford66
(5,523 posts)Joy should have let him make a complete statement, then rebut it. I watched live. If one didn't know anything at the start, you didn't learn anything at all.
TraceNC
(254 posts)what hes trying to do, and after that interview its still not clear.
She accused him of taking some disconnected or barely-connected information and stuffing it all into a grievance argument, but thats what she did with his quotes and tweets.
She might be right about the guy being a dishonest peddler of false information, but then why have him on at all?
Weird segment.
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)Joy is not there to platform a race hustler. She's there to call him out on his bullshit.
Letting David Duke on TV "debates" to spread his talking points is how he got famous enough to get elected into public office and win the majority of the white vote in his Senate campaign.
Do not platform propagandists. If you must have them on your show, clown them constantly and make them sweat.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)had it been me, I would have told him to FOAD