General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBad Infrastructure Proposal
The so-called 'bipartisan infrastructure' proposal is about as bad as it gets. First, there's only a lousy $579 billion in new spending, which is a fraction of what Biden originally proposed even for just the hard infrastructure.
Second, the 'pay-fors' are even worse. Forcing state and local governments to RAISE TAXES to pay for the broadband expansion, taking money from the emergency covid Unemployment Insurance fund, unspecified repurposed emergency funding from COVID-19 relief bills, which means money intended to go to state and local governments to shore up public health and to continue fighting coronavirus would be redirected, selling broadband spectrum, and mandatory cuts to other programs in extending the sequester(?).
The absolute WORST, is the public/private partnerships. Selling off public assets to private corporations, so they can then charge consumers astronomical fees for the rest of their natural lives, while the corporations rake in obscene profits.
There's no concrete agreement that the eleven Repubs will vote for it, or that Moscow Mitch won't find a way to scuttle it, but hopefully the Repubs will sink it all by themselves, as they object to what the Dems include in the reconciliation bill.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Nope.
hookaleft
(938 posts)SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)You get this bipartisan deal and then proceed on the dem only second track
The arm chair quarterbacking second guessing of Biden is lame.
Ocelot II
(115,704 posts)Bummer.
stillcool
(32,626 posts)not that I don't believe you, but I'll wait until it's written
paleotn
(17,918 posts)Worst yet, Paul wasn't paid for either. The kicker was always paying for it and our side accomplished nothing in that regard except giving away the store. I'm actually hoping McConnell scuttles the agreement. Then we can ram through a good bill via reconciliation.
Hekate
(90,690 posts)
which is upcoming. Both Biden and Pelosi expect the two bills to arrive simultaneously.
I did not see your representation but hey, I could be wrong.
WHITT
(2,868 posts)in front of the White House, Sinema said, "Nobody got everything they wanted in this package. We gave some to get some".
WHERE? I see NOTHING the Dems 'got' that wasn't already a given. All they did was GIVE.
WHITT
(2,868 posts)told PBS that the spending in the 'bipartisan proposal' is so small, he will demand that additional spending for hard infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and broadband, etc, be included in the second reconciliation bill which was intended to only be for human infrastructure.
I think it is way too small, paltry, pitiful. And I will insist on a second package that not only addresses more roads and bridges and tangible assets, but also human infrastructure.
Hekate
(90,690 posts)Im sure that was the plan all along.
Kee-riste.
you mean I added additional facts as they subsequently presented themselves, you're welcome.