Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIbram X. Kendi: There Is No Debate Over Critical Race Theory
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
Ibram X. Kendi
@DrIbram
These critics arent arguing against me. They arent arguing against anti-racist thinkers. They arent arguing against critical race theorists. These critics are arguing against themselves.
My latest @TheAtlantic. 1/5
There Is No Debate Over Critical Race Theory
Pundits and politicians have created their own definition for the term, and then set about attacking it.
theatlantic.com
7:41 AM · Jul 9, 2021
Ibram X. Kendi
@DrIbram
These critics arent arguing against me. They arent arguing against anti-racist thinkers. They arent arguing against critical race theorists. These critics are arguing against themselves.
My latest @TheAtlantic. 1/5
There Is No Debate Over Critical Race Theory
Pundits and politicians have created their own definition for the term, and then set about attacking it.
theatlantic.com
7:41 AM · Jul 9, 2021
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/07/opponents-critical-race-theory-are-arguing-themselves/619391/
The United States is not in the midst of a culture war over race and racism. The animating force of our current conflict is not our differing values, beliefs, moral codes, or practices. The American people arent divided. The American people are being divided.
Republican operatives have buried the actual definition of critical race theory: a way of looking at laws role platforming, facilitating, producing, and even insulating racial inequality in our country, as the law professor Kimberlé Crenshaw, who helped coin the term, recently defined it. Instead, the attacks on critical race theory are based on made-up definitions and descriptors. Critical race theory says every white person is a racist, Senator Ted Cruz has said. It basically teaches that certain children are inherently bad people because of the color of their skin, said the Alabama state legislator Chris Pringle.
There are differing points of view about race and racism. But what we are seeing and hearing on news shows, in school-district meetings, in op-ed pages, in legislative halls, and in social-media feeds arent multiple sides with differing points of view. Theres only one side in our so-called culture war right now.
The Republican operatives, who dismiss the expositions of critical race theorists and anti-racists in order to define critical race theory and anti-racism, and then attack those definitions, are effectively debating themselves. They have conjured an imagined monster to scare the American people and project themselves as the nations defenders from that fictional monster.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 665 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ibram X. Kendi: There Is No Debate Over Critical Race Theory (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jul 2021
OP
Initech
(100,087 posts)1. It's the Fox News outrage of the day.
And they made the whole thing up, like every other "scandal" they've made up against Obama and Biden.
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)2. They don't have to understand wat is means. They like the phraseology. It has the words "critical"
Race. They can make it mean whatever they want it to mean, like Defund the police! . They frame it in a way to make it a threat to their racist, low information voters.
Mosby
(16,320 posts)3. Kendi isn't a liberal, he's a marxist.
Kendi is careful not to say the quiet part out loud. Hence the vagueness at the end of the book. But in a recent Politico symposium on how to fix inequality in America, Kendi did get more specific. He supports a constitutional amendment that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principles: Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy and the different racial groups are equals. This is how he thinks it would work:
It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees. The DOA would be responsible for preclearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they wont yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas.
There is, of course, no conceivable way such an amendment would succeed in the grueling process that is amending the Constitution. And this amendment is completely incompatible with many other core tenets of the American Constitution. But it really is a revelation to see the goal Kendi sets.
He wants unelected formally trained experts on racism (presumably all from critical race-theory departments) to have unaccountable control over every policy that wont yield racial equality in every field of life, public or private. They are tasked with investigating private racist policies. Any policy change anywhere in the U.S. would have to be precleared by these experts who could use disciplinary tools if policymakers do not cave to their demands. They would monitor and control public and private speech. What Kendi wants is power to coerce others to accept his worldview and to implement his preferred policies, over and above democratic accountability or political opposition. Among those policies would be those explicitly favoring nonwhites over whites because the only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.