Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Supreme Court's Term Appeared To Be Cautious. The Numbers Tell A Different Story
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/09/1013951873/the-supreme-courts-term-appeared-to-be-cautious-the-numbers-tell-a-different-stoDespite a cautious approach to controversy for most of the Supreme Court term, statistics for the whole term tell a different story. By the numbers, the justices swerved to the right, even by the standards of the traditionally conservative Roberts court.
A picture of this rightward shift is captured by statistics compiled through NPR number crunching and the SCOTUSblog Stat Pack.
More cases were decided along ideological lines with conservative results than in years past. Since John Roberts became chief justice in 2005, the court has on average decided just under 10% of its cases by polarized 5-4 votes. This term, that percentage has gone up, with the court's new conservative supermajority winning 15% of cases by a polarized vote of 6-3, plus an additional 4% decided by a conservative 5-4 majority.
Where the liberals lost
Despite some analysis suggesting that this was a year of unusual unanimity, the facts don't bear this out. True, the justices reached unanimity more than they have in the past three years, but they did so less than the average for the full 15 years of the Roberts court. And many of this term's unanimous opinions were on staid statutory questions that would put even some lawyers to sleep.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 554 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Supreme Court's Term Appeared To Be Cautious. The Numbers Tell A Different Story (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jul 2021
OP
Expand SCROTUS NOW. This is an emergency; they are stripping voting rights.
lagomorph777
Jul 2021
#2
Control of the SCOTUS was on the ballot in 2017 and now Roe v. Wade is on the chopping block
LetMyPeopleVote
Jul 2021
#3
FBaggins
(26,751 posts)1. I don't think the two things are contradictory
"Cautious" is a relative thing. Obviously... replacing Ginsburg with Barrett was going to change some results.
But some of those 8-1/9-0 narrow rulings could easily have been 5-4/6-3 blockbuster precedent-setting rulings. That's cautious.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)2. Expand SCROTUS NOW. This is an emergency; they are stripping voting rights.
Roberts needs to be remembered as the asshole who finally made it obvious that SCROTUS is broken.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,374 posts)3. Control of the SCOTUS was on the ballot in 2017 and now Roe v. Wade is on the chopping block
This new SCOTUS is very very conservative and I expect to see Roe overturn next term
UTUSN
(70,715 posts)4. Yea, not taken in by that sprinkling of "uanimous" berdictz