Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,035 posts)
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:01 PM Aug 2021

CBS' Major Garrett Asks Nikki Haley If Trump Administration 'Set in Motion What We're Seeing Now' in

Afghanistan

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley slammed the Biden administration over Afghanistan while defending the Trump administration over their role in negotiating with the Taliban.

Haley said the Biden administration “completely surrendered to the Taliban” as she spoke to Major Garrett on CBS’s Face The Nation. She further pronounced America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan an “embarrassing failure” and claimed that the U.S.’ allies “literally won’t trust us at this point and think we’ve lost our minds.”

As the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan gave way to the ongoing chaos in Kabul, there has been a great deal of conversation lately about whether Haley and the rest of the Donald Trump administration laid the groundwork for the current chaos. Garrett brought this up, noting that former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo tried to forge a peace agreement with the Taliban years ago that originally called for U.S. forces to be withdrawn from Afghanistan by May.

“Did that set in motion what we’re seeing now?” Garrett asked.

Haley’s answer:

I think everybody’s wanting to go back and talk about Trump. The truth is, under four years of Trump, Afghanistan was safe. We made sure that we kept terrorism at bay and that we came from a strength of position. What’s happened in seven months of Biden is we’ve completely surrendered and we’ve humiliated ourselves in the eyes of the world. The thing is, there are times where you have to negotiate with the devil, but you negotiate with the devil from a point of strength. You don’t do it from a point of weakness. We literally have no leverage right now with the Taliban. All we’re going to see them do is they’re going to buy time and act like they’re going to be nice until August 31st, and then all of those women, all of those girls, everything is going to go back to the way it was.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/cbs-major-garrett-asks-nikki-haley-if-trump-administration-set-in-motion-what-were-seeing-now-in-afghanistan/ar-AANBszi

Really now Nimrata, Trump released 5000 Taliban who were imprisoned and cut our troop count in Afghanistan down to 2500. Plus he planned to be out by May 1.

You're full of yourself if you think anything would have been different.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
2. Afghanistan was Afghanistan because the Pig did nothing, when he did do something...
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:04 PM
Aug 2021

he screwed everyone except the Taliban.

Champp

(2,114 posts)
3. BIGLY Republican lie: "We literally have no leverage right now with the Taliban"
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:08 PM
Aug 2021

They are all prattling this talking-point lie like obedient little fasci-propaganda pimps.

They never say a damn thing about the money. Money is a definite and crucial point of leverage.

So the Republicans should shut up their lying yaps, and try supporting America for a change.

brush

(53,791 posts)
5. Yep, we control Afghanistan's money...what's left of it...
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:20 PM
Aug 2021

after the Afghan president fled with 160 some million last weekend.

And they never mention the 5000k Taliban trump "negotiated" to release in his Feb. 2020 agreement with the Taliban.

underpants

(182,830 posts)
9. They also seem to think the Taliban would bow to Trump
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:42 PM
Aug 2021

and Pompeo. They are such strong manly men you see.


The agreement said nothing ZERO about the Taliban NOT taking over. It simply said they’d agree to keep terrorists out of Afghanistan….except for themselves of course.

ZonkerHarris

(24,229 posts)
7. the questions should be: since you are for staying in Afghanistan how many more American soldiers
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:26 PM
Aug 2021

lives should be lost before we declare it a loss or a win?

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
11. Probably nothing pointed, this is how the M$M operates
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:45 PM
Aug 2021

They let on RePuQs to spew their talking points uninhibited pretty much always.

At best they proffer softball questions like this one, which I suspect they've provided to the guest in advance so they can formulate their talking points.

Stuart G

(38,436 posts)
10. .The PAA, "The Pig Association of America" (of which I am a member) has said that we want nothing to
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:44 PM
Aug 2021

do with this lying fool/idiot/slob/ & jerk...

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
13. Really Nikki?
Mon Aug 23, 2021, 01:46 PM
Aug 2021

Have you forgotten the February 29, 2020 agreement your hero concluded with the Taliban? I'm confident you'd like to forget it and not have anyone bring it up again ever.

https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Agreement-For-Bringing-Peace-to-Afghanistan-02.29.20.pdf

It was darned nice of Boss Former Guy to agree to just hand over five military bases to the Taliban, wasn't it?

A. The United States, its allies, and the Coalition will take the following measures in the first one hundred thirty-five (135) days:

1) They will reduce the number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan to eight thousand six hundred (8,600) and proportionally bring reduction in the number of its allies and Coalition forces.

2) The United States, its allies, and the Coalition will withdraw all their forces from five (5) military bases.


Did Mr. Shart of the Deal get a good price?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CBS' Major Garrett Asks N...