Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:44 AM Oct 2012

Fidel Castro is near a neurovegetative state from a stroke. Good.

In the 90s I was lucky enough to spend a month in a rental car, driving around the entire island of Cuba. The people were warm and wonderful, thrilled to meet an American. We were treated so well by the people but throughout our visit the police would stop us, would arrest people who were talking to us, they took my friend away leaving me stranded at 4 in the morning in a slum on the far reaches of Havana.

I was also able to spend almost the same amount of time in the former Soviet Union. I made it as far as Moscow before my VISA expired. There too the people were wonderful and the police followed me everywhere and hassled the people who spoke to me.

But Cuba was much worse than the Soviet Union. The people we met had very little. Their spirits were nearly broken. Fidel Castro and his cronies sucked the life out of those people and that country. I have never seen a country where the government has worked so hard to destroy the will and spirit of their people.

I cheer that Castro is on his death bed. May Cuba break free from the chains of communism.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/10/18/3056621/fidel-castro-suffered-a-stroke.html

198 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fidel Castro is near a neurovegetative state from a stroke. Good. (Original Post) DonRedwood Oct 2012 OP
Will that be the morning headline? Castro Dead Lint Head Oct 2012 #1
Reallly? I think you might be disappointed flamingdem Oct 2012 #2
Capitalism is the worst system, except for all of the others (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #3
+1 hrmjustin Oct 2012 #8
Really? Want to compare Cuba to Haiti? Marr Oct 2012 #93
Better medical care too. alarimer Oct 2012 #129
Without the embargo? obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #135
link to miami harald DonRedwood Oct 2012 #4
You're saying they let you rent a car in car-starved Cuba? CreekDog Oct 2012 #82
Cstro is harder to kill than a cockroach. deaniac21 Oct 2012 #5
Same dude that spends his life claiming that Hugo Chavez is dying from cancer.. flamingdem Oct 2012 #6
I am not a Castro fan by any measure bluestateguy Oct 2012 #7
"And the embargo is an outdated Cold War relic that should be repealed." KansDem Oct 2012 #29
I remeber in 1999(?) seeing all those hardline anti-Cuba congresscritters Blue_Tires Oct 2012 #96
The 'chains of communism?' leftstreet Oct 2012 #9
ha ha It's so retro, and irrelevant, the Cubans are tremendous NATIONALISTS n/t flamingdem Oct 2012 #17
I didn't say they weren't...but i did not meet a single person who liked castro DonRedwood Oct 2012 #20
"And they weren't afraid to say it." Scootaloo Oct 2012 #21
Yeah I noticed that too...in fact, the OP says they were getting arrested for saying it CreekDog Oct 2012 #85
They weren't afraid to say it? aquart Oct 2012 #22
"They weren't afraid to say it," but their spirits are "broken" because castro has "sucked the life HiPointDem Oct 2012 #25
no kidding arely staircase Oct 2012 #62
Wait -- you think Castro is an oppressive dictator obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #60
They didn't feel free enough to start a political party and oppose him in an election. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #119
Which is a nice huge scarecrow obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #134
But it is perfectly true hack89 Oct 2012 #141
Cuba has at least 10 political parties 0rganism Oct 2012 #156
" No party is permitted to campaign or endorse candidates for election" hack89 Oct 2012 #157
"including the Communist Party" 0rganism Oct 2012 #160
Because candidates are chosen not elected. hack89 Oct 2012 #161
why not post the link to your source? 0rganism Oct 2012 #166
There is nothing there that points at free and open elections hack89 Oct 2012 #175
Are you refering to that intra-union fight hack89 Oct 2012 #162
yes, you "supported" the scab union 0rganism Oct 2012 #167
It was not a scab union - it was merely the union you didn't support. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #174
They were scabs. You're anti-union leftstreet Oct 2012 #196
I support unions hack89 Oct 2012 #197
so much for freedom of speech... magical thyme Oct 2012 #68
Stick around - it's election time so all the normally quiet TBF Oct 2012 #45
Well, I DO feel enlightened... Scootaloo Oct 2012 #88
Well, that was tacky. And maudlin. Comrade Grumpy Oct 2012 #10
Well, they kept re-electing Castro for some reason. Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #11
I remember watching all the Cuban presidential debates ... oh wait hack89 Oct 2012 #48
Me too and what the OP lacks is an explanation for why the police do what they do flamingdem Oct 2012 #14
+1 crunch60 Oct 2012 #26
Don't forget the legacy of US terrorism in Cuba. I mean that was what I first thought of Puregonzo1188 Oct 2012 #70
"May Cuba break free from the chains of communism" Scootaloo Oct 2012 #12
+1 Don't forget Cuba's national healthcare. Where's ours? leftstreet Oct 2012 #16
"Comminism" KansDem Oct 2012 #38
Amen to that. hifiguy Oct 2012 #65
lift the embargo and Cubans will do just fine Adenoid_Hynkel Oct 2012 #13
I agree. When attacking Cuba one is basically siding with the worst right wing and exploitative flamingdem Oct 2012 #15
+1,000 malaise Oct 2012 #31
100% this obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #61
Exactly right! nt crunch60 Oct 2012 #27
And that's why it won't be lifted. Marr Oct 2012 #95
Exactly. That has always been the biggest problem. Not Castro. n/t vaberella Oct 2012 #111
his death would be about as relevant as these cliches Enrique Oct 2012 #18
Very wrong! His death will be a huge symbolic moment for Latin America flamingdem Oct 2012 #19
+1 graham4anything Oct 2012 #28
Let us try to recall how happy we were when Batista ran Cuba. aquart Oct 2012 #23
^^^ Recommended!!! KansDem Oct 2012 #33
TY! For giving the details I couldn't. aquart Oct 2012 #100
Godfather II actually gives a good background on this obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #103
So they traded one authoritarian leader for another hack89 Oct 2012 #105
Yes, dear. That's what they did. aquart Oct 2012 #109
Free and open multi-party elections after a post revolution transition period. hack89 Oct 2012 #115
We have that. Yet no national healthcare leftstreet Oct 2012 #138
That's your measure of freedom? hack89 Oct 2012 #139
You're the one trying to talk about 'freedom' leftstreet Oct 2012 #148
Watching DUrs rationalize single party authoritarian government is so funny. hack89 Oct 2012 #151
We're an enigma, the rest of the wetern democracies have universal health care Hippo_Tron Oct 2012 #198
"The Enemy of my Enemy" is sometimes my Enemy... brooklynite Oct 2012 #193
You are a person who has absolutely no inclination as to the history of Cuba. vaberella Oct 2012 #112
Batista ruled for seven years, Castro for 60. hack89 Oct 2012 #116
And during Batista's time --- he killed 20,000 Cubans. vaberella Oct 2012 #125
So it was impossible for Castro to implement multiparty democracy hack89 Oct 2012 #127
Communists were immensely helpful in the industrial union movement in the U.S. amborin Oct 2012 #24
I thought travel to Cuba was "illegal" for Americans? KansDem Oct 2012 #30
I think most go to Canada, then fly down. I been there two times, B Calm Oct 2012 #34
Thanks for the info KansDem Oct 2012 #37
You can buy Cuban cigars in Canada. B Calm Oct 2012 #39
My sister lives in Coeur d'Alene KansDem Oct 2012 #40
Yeah, if you can afford them. Comrade Grumpy Oct 2012 #78
Americans travel to Cuba through the Bahamas Kolesar Oct 2012 #80
The thing holding Cuba is our embargo! B Calm Oct 2012 #32
Running out of corn nut stories, Snoutport? Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #35
.... TBF Oct 2012 #46
Good morning, TBF! Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #57
That is a really good point obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #58
That's the name I was trying to remember! REP Oct 2012 #89
Very interesting thread obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #92
And fruit leather! nt. Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #97
Ah, jeez. The Cuban people need to live in a cesspool of predatory capitalism like we do because Skidmore Oct 2012 #36
And he has a beard. H2O Man Oct 2012 #41
... and "dark eyes" too! n/t KoKo Oct 2012 #182
The CIA made H2O Man Oct 2012 #185
That's priceless... KoKo Oct 2012 #190
it must be terrible for the people to have access to low cost health care quinnox Oct 2012 #42
That explains why so many Americans try to ride to Cuba on inner tubes (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #72
irrelevent n/t quinnox Oct 2012 #73
Fidel didn't let USA rape Cuba Welcome_hubby Oct 2012 #43
No - he turned it into the Soviet Union's lap dog instead. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #49
That ONLY happened because of the US's cold shoulder obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #63
Perhaps. hack89 Oct 2012 #66
I'm just going to come right out and ask. Kindly Refrain Oct 2012 #74
I think that one is a gungeoneer quinnox Oct 2012 #75
Considering 40% of Democrats own guns hack89 Oct 2012 #163
No - a die in the wool Democrat from a long line of blue collar Democrats hack89 Oct 2012 #77
So In Other Words..... Paladin Oct 2012 #84
I oppose any sanctions on Cuba hack89 Oct 2012 #87
but it's only guns and sometimes taxes that you get really animated about CreekDog Oct 2012 #91
But guns are not a purely RW issue so I don't see your point hack89 Oct 2012 #94
So Casto would have rejected single party rule with some American love and money? hack89 Oct 2012 #118
Another scarecrow obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #136
You are the one rationalizing authoritarian one party rule hack89 Oct 2012 #140
No. America did that---no idea of the history then don't talk about it. n/t vaberella Oct 2012 #113
So America force Cuba to send it's armies to fight in Africa? hack89 Oct 2012 #117
and of course the US policy of burying Cuba has nothing to do with anything CBGLuthier Oct 2012 #44
Hmmm. I seem to recall the Cuban people were just as bad off before Castro... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #47
Does that mean we can lift the stupid fucking embargo? Iggo Oct 2012 #50
LOL! TransitJohn Oct 2012 #51
The heirs of Fulgencio Batista thank you for your support. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #52
I bet nobody died in Cuba because they couldn't afford to see a doctor about a dental abscess. jsr Oct 2012 #53
Castro will die in old age. I don't get the celebrating. He kinda won. Zen Democrat Oct 2012 #54
Also, the 1960s called and said they want quinnox Oct 2012 #55
Our Stupid Blockade Has Kept Castro In Power For Decades. Paladin Oct 2012 #56
I find your OP header extrememly inappropriate obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #59
Last I checked the Cold War was over GObamaGO Oct 2012 #64
Gee. Stay classy. Zoeisright Oct 2012 #67
Thread title in extremely poor taste...n/t CorBlimeyGuvnor Oct 2012 #69
I believe it's the meanest title I've ever seen on DU. Prometheus Bound Oct 2012 #99
I agree. n/t vaberella Oct 2012 #114
you were in the USSR before the mid-80s? CreekDog Oct 2012 #71
May Cuba break free from the stranglehold of the United States. Arugula Latte Oct 2012 #76
Yup...+1 joeybee12 Oct 2012 #79
Paging Mika -- Hell Hath No Fury Oct 2012 #81
Teachers can afford month-long foreign vacations now? LeftyMom Oct 2012 #83
The Mafia ruined Youngstown Kolesar Oct 2012 #86
I love your stories, you really seem to bounce around the world CreekDog Oct 2012 #90
How many products made in Red China have you bought this week? Dr Fate Oct 2012 #98
That's an excellent insight. And, thanks for posting it. KoKo Oct 2012 #181
The 50's called, they want their overblown, fearmongering rhetoric back. 2ndAmForComputers Oct 2012 #101
best comment! flamingdem Oct 2012 #104
There is always a helluva storm in that little teapot upi402 Oct 2012 #107
Castro's status is immaterial. He is not a factor that matters in politics. LiberalFighter Oct 2012 #102
I disagree hack89 Oct 2012 #106
I like Fidel. Sure his economics might not be that good but he saved Cuba from US imperialism. craigmatic Oct 2012 #108
Yes, because Batista's mass murders, genocide of Blacks and the Wests rape and pillage of Cuba... vaberella Oct 2012 #110
That justifies 60 years of one man rule? Really? nt hack89 Oct 2012 #120
Oh so all of those things are okay?! By your estimation, then?! vaberella Oct 2012 #122
So dictators who don't indulge in mass murder are ok with you? Wow!! hack89 Oct 2012 #124
So 60 years of GW Bush would be ok as long as he didn't advocate mass murder? ok. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #126
Cuba was a poor Carribean nation before Castro and will be after... JCMach1 Oct 2012 #121
I cannot share with your enthusiasm about a human suffering, even if he doesn't feel anything slackmaster Oct 2012 #123
I suppose the OP would rather Cuba was still run by Batista and Meyer Lansky? leveymg Oct 2012 #128
No third option? hack89 Oct 2012 #130
Without Castro, Cuba would probably be similar to the Dominican Republic. Press not free there, leveymg Oct 2012 #131
So Latin America requires strongmen to prosper? True democracy is a hindrance to be avoided? hack89 Oct 2012 #132
Caudillos aren't my preferred form of governance - true democracy may exist in Iceland leveymg Oct 2012 #133
There has been no US imposed strong man in Cuba for 60 years hack89 Oct 2012 #142
Exactly. leveymg Oct 2012 #143
Do you think the Cuban people should be given a real say in what change is made? hack89 Oct 2012 #146
Who's going to give it to them? leveymg Oct 2012 #149
Up to the authoritarian government to give? Or for the people to take? hack89 Oct 2012 #150
Maybe the Evil Spock will play Che to the revolution that Fidel made? leveymg Oct 2012 #153
The world does not need another Che. nt hack89 Oct 2012 #155
Don't worry. He got turned into a commodity a long time ago. leveymg Oct 2012 #158
Ohhhh... The world will get used to many MORE Che's as we go forward with Wall Street Bankers. n/t KoKo Oct 2012 #170
Considering his unbroken string of failure hack89 Oct 2012 #177
They will do it. Two out of three of the demands of the Varela Project have been met. joshcryer Oct 2012 #165
I dispute that. Cuba wasn't occupied like DR. joshcryer Oct 2012 #164
leveymg....Excellent Point! n/t KoKo Oct 2012 #168
I am wondering why the OP never revisited this thread obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #137
Good question. In fact, there are tons of good questions in this thread. CreekDog Oct 2012 #144
Maybe he and Tom Clancy are having a reunion. Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #152
Might be too close to McCarthy Era to want to engage in discussion. KoKo Oct 2012 #169
Did you even read the OP? Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #172
+1 obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #176
Links please for my "repeated misuse of that term" here on DU.... KoKo Oct 2012 #187
This is just from two hours ago: Starry Messenger Oct 2012 #194
I lived in a dictatorship for five years... brooklynite Oct 2012 #145
Texas in the 90s? leveymg Oct 2012 #147
Really? What in your opinion is definition of "Dictator?" What definition do you use to judge? KoKo Oct 2012 #171
A dictator chooses to rule without any regard for democratic process... brooklynite Oct 2012 #173
Well we've seen a taste of that with BUSH II...but it's been a progression that's gone on KoKo Oct 2012 #178
NO - WE - HAVE - NOT brooklynite Oct 2012 #184
Wait, haven't you posted about being a 1%er before? LeftyMom Oct 2012 #179
So, because I'm financially well off... brooklynite Oct 2012 #180
Since the offense appears to be denying political domination to you and yours, and actually giving a LeftyMom Oct 2012 #186
You DO know your Filipino history, don't you? brooklynite Oct 2012 #189
Oh, Bullshit. The Candadian and European tourists there JanMichael Oct 2012 #154
Gee, I guess our embargo had nothing to do with Cuba's economic condition. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #159
"May Cuba break free from the chains of communism." marmar Oct 2012 #183
Right ON! Exactly....! KoKo Oct 2012 #188
Why couldn't it be done with free and open elections? hack89 Oct 2012 #191
Have you looked at USA in the past 12 years? KoKo Oct 2012 #192
Yes - a man of color won a free and open election hack89 Oct 2012 #195

flamingdem

(39,316 posts)
2. Reallly? I think you might be disappointed
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:46 AM
Oct 2012

This is no doubt a right wing rumor, every October there's a new one. Fidel's son said he's fine and working on a book.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
93. Really? Want to compare Cuba to Haiti?
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 03:46 PM
Oct 2012

Comparing Cuba to the United States is a bit silly. When compared to sister nations that enjoy US "protection", it's looks a lot better. Without the embargo, the comparison would be even worse.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
129. Better medical care too.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:43 AM
Oct 2012

At least everyone is covered. Unlike the US where you simply die without insurance or go bankrupt.

What would it have been like without the embargo? My guess is they would have been much better off.

We deal politically with much worse people than the Castros. We have propped up any number of right-wing dictators, simply because they were not "communist."

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
82. You're saying they let you rent a car in car-starved Cuba?
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:25 PM
Oct 2012

that they in this vicious dictatorship in the 90's, they let you roam at will with your rented car, talking to people who were allowed to say bad things about the government --bad enough to get them arrested upon your departure?

curious what kind of car you rented there. must have been pretty good, it got you around the entire island for a month!

flamingdem

(39,316 posts)
6. Same dude that spends his life claiming that Hugo Chavez is dying from cancer..
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:53 AM
Oct 2012
http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2012/10/fidel_castro_supposedly_releas.php



ABC spoke to Dr. José Rafael Marquina, a Venezuelan native who has lived in Florida for the past 20 years. Marquina made a name for himself by publicly analyzing Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's recent bout with cancer. He claims to have sources with information of Chavez's health, and now of Castro's.

ABC reports that Chavez traveled to Cuba yesterday to get a health check-up and to visit Castro (no other media appears to confirm this).

Marquina claims that Castro "has suffered a massive embolism in the right brain artery," and is "dying." It's unclear where exactly Marquina is getting his information, though it's the latest in a string of rumors that Castro's health has seriously declined. The fact he did not publicly congratulate Chavez on his reelection last week further spurred speculation.

Castro hasn't so much as released a public word since June. So, today, state-run newspapers published a letter supposedly written by Castro in which he congratulated doctors graduating from a medical academy. Not everyone is buying that Castro actually wrote the letter. The retired dictator hasn't been seen in public since earlier this year when he greeted the Pope.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
7. I am not a Castro fan by any measure
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:53 AM
Oct 2012

He is a tyrant. But it is not our job to remove him. The Cuban people will have to do that themselves, if they should want to.

And the embargo is an outdated Cold War relic that should be repealed.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
29. "And the embargo is an outdated Cold War relic that should be repealed."
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 05:49 AM
Oct 2012

Agreed.

We lost over 58,000 Americans in Vietnam, lost the war, yet, we can now buy products make there in our big-box retailers.

I don't recall any American deaths in Cuba but we maintain this embargo?

Doesn't make sense...

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
96. I remeber in 1999(?) seeing all those hardline anti-Cuba congresscritters
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 03:57 PM
Oct 2012

spend hours on C-SPAN arguing why we need to have open trade with China...it was surreal...

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
20. I didn't say they weren't...but i did not meet a single person who liked castro
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:09 AM
Oct 2012

and they weren't afraid to say it.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
21. "And they weren't afraid to say it."
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:24 AM
Oct 2012

Funny thing, in nations that actually are run by oppressive dictatorships, the people are afraid to say it. In nations like the Capitalist paragons of Pinochet's Chile or the Argentine junta, criticism of the government got you a gut wound and a high dive into the ocean.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
25. "They weren't afraid to say it," but their spirits are "broken" because castro has "sucked the life
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:59 AM
Oct 2012

out of them & the country" and "destroyed their will & spirit".

and everyone who talked to you was stopped by the police & arrested as well.

ok, whatever.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
62. no kidding
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:21 AM
Oct 2012

and why did he keep talking to people after, i don't know, the first few times this happened?

probably because it didn't happen

obamanut2012

(26,094 posts)
60. Wait -- you think Castro is an oppressive dictator
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:19 AM
Oct 2012

And yet people felt free enough to criticize him to an outsider?



How are your chains of capitalism feeling this morn?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
141. But it is perfectly true
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:44 PM
Oct 2012

I just wanted to throw it out there amidst all this rationalizing of one party authoritarian governments.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
157. " No party is permitted to campaign or endorse candidates for election"
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 05:48 PM
Oct 2012

so don't give me that crap. The Communist Party hand picks who will be elected.

The Communist Party has a complete monopoly on power.

0rganism

(23,962 posts)
160. "including the Communist Party"
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 06:27 PM
Oct 2012

Very convenient how you left that part out, eh? Nice cherry picking there.

But it's no surprise coming from you, I remember when you took a shit on the longshoremen's strike in Washington. True to character, all the way.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
161. Because candidates are chosen not elected.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 06:35 PM
Oct 2012

Candidates are selected by Candidacy Commissions .

Candidates for the National Assembly are chosen by Candidacy Commissions chaired by local trade union officials and composed of elected representatives of "mass organizations" representing workers, youth, women, students and farmers. The Candidacy Commissions produce slates of recommended candidates for each electoral district. The final list of candidates, one for each district, is drawn up by the National Candidacy Commission, taking into account criteria such as candidates’ popularity, merit, patriotism, ethical values and “revolutionary history.”


On edit: That is why the Communist Party does not need to campaign or endorse candidates. They have absolute control of the entire process.

0rganism

(23,962 posts)
166. why not post the link to your source?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:14 PM
Oct 2012

Seriously, when you quote something, it's just common decency to let people know where you got it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Cuba

There's a lot more to it than your on-edit statement might lead someone to believe.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
175. There is nothing there that points at free and open elections
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:41 PM
Oct 2012

Show me the mechanism where one could run for president of Cuba. That's right - it is impossible.

I find it so funny how many here support one part authoritarian governments.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
162. Are you refering to that intra-union fight
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 06:36 PM
Oct 2012

where I backed a different union than you did. Yes - I think you might be.

0rganism

(23,962 posts)
167. yes, you "supported" the scab union
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:15 PM
Oct 2012

More to the point, you opposed the ILWU. Big surprise there.

leftstreet

(36,110 posts)
196. They were scabs. You're anti-union
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:47 PM
Oct 2012

It's no surprise you're supporting free marketz capitalism here

hack89

(39,171 posts)
197. I support unions
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:52 PM
Oct 2012

Last edited Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:29 AM - Edit history (1)

I support free market capitalism. They are not mutually exclusive

You are just looking for a way to derail the conversation.

Supporting one party authoritarian governments is certainly not pro-worker.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
68. so much for freedom of speech...
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:45 AM
Oct 2012

oh, wait a minute. Never mind.

ps I had a right-wing Australian boss who visited Cuba; rented a car and drove all around, meeting with the people. He told wonderful stories about the people, and about driving around occasional chickens and cows in the streets. But he didn't come back with any horror stories, though.

TBF

(32,084 posts)
45. Stick around - it's election time so all the normally quiet
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 08:02 AM
Oct 2012

moles are out and about enlightening us with their wisdom.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
10. Well, that was tacky. And maudlin.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:12 AM
Oct 2012

I've spent time in Cuba, too. The people I met had living spirits. Some liked the government, some didn't, some could care less.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
48. I remember watching all the Cuban presidential debates ... oh wait
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 08:07 AM
Oct 2012

that's right. Cuba is a one party state where opposing political views are not tolerated.

Every dictatorship has a constitution and elections.

flamingdem

(39,316 posts)
14. Me too and what the OP lacks is an explanation for why the police do what they do
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:28 AM
Oct 2012

I think it takes more than 1 trip to Cuba to understand the culture and society.

It's very easy to be a naive gringo stomping around and yelling about human rights in a society you don't understand.
Cubans who engage in befriending tourists can really work it and charm the pants off of a foreigner. The police are heavy handed when they are from the countryside and they overreact but it's for a reason. The foreigner is at a great disadvantage and won't get the game until trip 2, 3, 4 ... some never get it and marry a hustler. The crackdowns that happened ten or so years ago were needed and prostitution is greatly controlled. Now Cubans have access to hotels and tourist areas, it's a healthier situation, but it was simply impossible not to control the situation when it first opened up.

Why don't people consider the history of Cuba when judging. How about the fact that the USA could give a fuck if Cubans suffer due to the embargo. Fidel wanted equality for his people. He will leave a tremendous legacy.


Puregonzo1188

(1,948 posts)
70. Don't forget the legacy of US terrorism in Cuba. I mean that was what I first thought of
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:53 AM
Oct 2012

when he mentioned the police following him around.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
12. "May Cuba break free from the chains of communism"
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:24 AM
Oct 2012

Said by someone dwelling in the "first world" nation with the highest rates of infant mortality, homelessness, lowest life expectancy, worst educational system, and most corrupt economic system, that's pretty fucking laughable.

Tell me another one, Papa McCarthy!

leftstreet

(36,110 posts)
16. +1 Don't forget Cuba's national healthcare. Where's ours?
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:30 AM
Oct 2012

Single payer non-profit healthcare in Cuba, but not in the US

The 'chains of Capitalism' is more like it

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
65. Amen to that.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:39 AM
Oct 2012

How many Cubans die because they are unable to afford medical attention? Cuba is no paradise - what place is - but it's far from hell on earth.

 

Adenoid_Hynkel

(14,093 posts)
13. lift the embargo and Cubans will do just fine
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:26 AM
Oct 2012

all the phony concern about 'freedom' from the right gets thrown out the window when they go courting China and the Saudis.

Castro looks like a choir boy next to those folks.

The only reason the U.S. policy is so harsh on Cuba is because the Cubans won't let the mafia and the old foreign interests run the place and suck it dry like they did under the dictator Batista.

China lets U.S. companies exploit their people, so, suddenly human rights abuses like Tibet and Tiananmen Square are no longer a concern.

Funny how that works.

Maybe it's time to quit letting the rightwing Batista holdovers in Miami set U.S. policy, and we take steps to benefit the people of both nations.

flamingdem

(39,316 posts)
15. I agree. When attacking Cuba one is basically siding with the worst right wing and exploitative
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:30 AM
Oct 2012

groups around including the charming right wing congressmen from Miami who would do all they can to undermine our freedoms here in their obsessive hate of Fidel.

malaise

(269,144 posts)
31. +1,000
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 05:56 AM
Oct 2012

FIdel Castro has done more to uplift his own people than any of the US backed dictators and generals of this hemisphere.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
95. And that's why it won't be lifted.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 03:51 PM
Oct 2012

People in Haiti, Jamaica... and lots of other places might start asking why they don't have the things Cubans have.

flamingdem

(39,316 posts)
19. Very wrong! His death will be a huge symbolic moment for Latin America
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:08 AM
Oct 2012

Not so much outside of that though as his cache is reduced lately along with his visibility.

Name another figure as important in the history of Latin America? Bolivar?

In terms of the USA he is hugely important as well. Name another country that stood up to US domination in this hemisphere?

Well we'll see what happens but there is still a leftward tilt in Latin America and a lot of respect for Cuba and Fidel's legacy.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
28. +1
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 03:33 AM
Oct 2012

hope this rumor is not true.

What is amazing is people speaking about things that are not true and the same people here and there that don't like the rightwing press, somehow love the rightwing press about Mr. Castro.

I think if one loves Jeb and George Bush & Marco Rubio, one hates Castro

and the same people still think the USSR is alive and well too



I do like that slowly the embargo is going and travel is allowed.I for one would love to legally be able to visit and spend my tourist money there.

It is OUR embargo from prior decades that is enslaving the people who live there, not Mr. Castro.
(one of the things I hope will change after our President no longer needs to run again when he wins in a few weeks).

aquart

(69,014 posts)
23. Let us try to recall how happy we were when Batista ran Cuba.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:31 AM
Oct 2012

Us, our mobs, our dealers. We loved that place. All those nice Cuban servants.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
33. ^^^ Recommended!!!
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 06:01 AM
Oct 2012

We seem to have forgotten what pre-Castro Cuba was like.

Batista established lasting relationships with organized crime, notably with American mobsters Meyer Lansky and Lucky Luciano, and under his rule Havana became known as "the Latin Las Vegas."[32] Batista and Lansky formed a friendship and business relationship that flourished for a decade. During a stay at the Waldorf-Astoria in New York in the late 1940s, it was mutually agreed that, in return for kickbacks, Batista would give Lansky and the Mafia control of Havana's racetracks and casinos.[33]

After World War II, American mobster Lucky Luciano was paroled from prison on the condition that he permanently return to Sicily. Luciano secretly moved to Cuba, where he worked to resume control over American Mafia operations. Luciano also ran a number of casinos in Cuba with the sanction of Batista, though the American government eventually succeeded in pressuring the Batista regime to deport him.[34]

Batista encouraged large-scale gambling in Havana. In 1955, he announced that Cuba would grant a gaming license to anyone who invested US$1 million in a hotel or $200,000 in a new nightclub—and that the government would provide matching public funds for construction, a 10-year tax exemption, and waive duties on imported equipment and furnishings for new hotels. Each casino would pay the government $250,000 for the license, plus a percentage of the profits. The policy omitted background checks, as required for casino operations in the United States, which opened the door for casino investors with illegally obtained funds. Cuban contractors with the right connections made windfalls by importing, duty-free, more materials than needed for new hotels and selling the surplus to others. It was rumored that, besides the $250,000 to obtain a license, an additional "under the table" fee was sometimes required.[35]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulgencio_Batista#Relationship_with_organized_crime


aquart

(69,014 posts)
100. TY! For giving the details I couldn't.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 05:13 PM
Oct 2012

There's total amnesia in the media for those glad (for the US) times.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
105. So they traded one authoritarian leader for another
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 09:45 PM
Oct 2012

only kings or dictators rule for 60 years and I don't see a crown on Castro's head.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
115. Free and open multi-party elections after a post revolution transition period.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:26 AM
Oct 2012

give the Cuban people actual choices.

I am constantly astounded how many here support and rationalize LW authoritarian leaders while condeming RW authoritarians. The hypocrisy is mind bending.

leftstreet

(36,110 posts)
138. We have that. Yet no national healthcare
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:29 PM
Oct 2012

I am constantly astounded by how many here equate democracy with capitalism

leftstreet

(36,110 posts)
148. You're the one trying to talk about 'freedom'
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 05:00 PM
Oct 2012

As if it actually means something or is even relevant here

hack89

(39,171 posts)
151. Watching DUrs rationalize single party authoritarian government is so funny.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 05:10 PM
Oct 2012

Dictators are bad - except when they are good.

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
112. You are a person who has absolutely no inclination as to the history of Cuba.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:21 AM
Oct 2012

Particularly under Batista to even think that Batista and Castro are comparable. It's like comparing Hitler and Lincoln.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
116. Batista ruled for seven years, Castro for 60.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:33 AM
Oct 2012

Castro did more and lasting damage to Cuba than Batista did - he squandered the opportunity to make Cuba free and prosperous. He choose a different path.

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
125. And during Batista's time --- he killed 20,000 Cubans.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:30 AM
Oct 2012

The country was overrun by US and foreign casinos. Yes, Castro did worse by turning those casino's into schools. Batista was allowing raping and killing of Black Cubans---Castro stopped that and it was one of the things that enraged him into revolting against Batista. Yes...Castro was an evil by wanting to stop the genocide of all his people. What lasting damage did Castro do? What lasting "damage" that he did that was not influenced by US foreign policy laws?! Tell me. Actually he did not squandered it. He wanted to protect it. Why am I debating this shit with you? When it's obvious you know nothing about the situation.

What different path did Castro do? Because he stopped US privatizing Cuban electricity?! Really? Because he stopped US privatizing water in Cuba? Really? You've got to be kidding me. To me, you sound like you would shit on Lincoln.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
127. So it was impossible for Castro to implement multiparty democracy
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:36 AM
Oct 2012

at any time in the past 60 years? Is that what you are saying? Or are you saying that one party authoritarian rule is ok?

Condemning Castro is not supporting Batista.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
24. Communists were immensely helpful in the industrial union movement in the U.S.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:53 AM
Oct 2012

We wouldn't have the UAW, IE, etc. if it hadn't been for their leadership and willingness to challenge capitalist domination.


That aside, one of the many unforgiveable things about Castro was how he had one of Cuba's top generals executed on trumped up charges. The general had had many successes in Angola, and returned to Cuba a war hero. This was simply too threatening to Castro.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
30. I thought travel to Cuba was "illegal" for Americans?
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 05:54 AM
Oct 2012

Many DUer's have remarked that they've been to Cuba. I would like to go sometime but thought it was off limits. What's the procedure for traveling there?

Oh, and that Scott DesJarlais is one sleazy dude!

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
34. I think most go to Canada, then fly down. I been there two times,
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 06:01 AM
Oct 2012

but that was in the US Navy and I never got to leave Gitmo Navy base.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
37. Thanks for the info
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 06:07 AM
Oct 2012

I have a friend who lives in Switzerland. He comes through my "neck of the woods" every once in a while and will bring me a box of Cuban cigars that he's purchased in a Swiss tobacco shop.

I like smoking them, but it's such a convoluted way of getting them.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
40. My sister lives in Coeur d'Alene
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 06:55 AM
Oct 2012

Northern Idaho.

The next time I visit her I might take a side trip up north to purchase a few.

Awful long way to go to smoke a Havana!

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
80. Americans travel to Cuba through the Bahamas
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:50 PM
Oct 2012

Or so I have heard. I'm more of a "hiking in the mountains" kind of vacationer.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
35. Running out of corn nut stories, Snoutport?
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 06:02 AM
Oct 2012

The Soviet Union dissolved in 1992. So if you were really there, you were about ten years old. Get help.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
36. Ah, jeez. The Cuban people need to live in a cesspool of predatory capitalism like we do because
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 06:03 AM
Oct 2012

we're #1 and truly exceptional and our poop doesn't stink. Rah! Rah!

H2O Man

(73,581 posts)
185. The CIA made
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:05 PM
Oct 2012

a noble attempt to make Castro's beard fall out, which would have brought peace, harmony, properity, and the Christian-Capitalism system to Cuba. They might have had Pat Boone, but instead fell under the influence of the Beatles (beards, again, by no coincidence).

Had the CIA have had binders of females-of-the-opposite-sex, they could have applied eye-shadow and perhaps hairy high-lights to Infide Castro. Much better than having a world leader who had eyes like Yoko.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
42. it must be terrible for the people to have access to low cost health care
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 07:24 AM
Oct 2012

Compared to our wonderful for profit health care system. Ah, the blessings of capitalism.

 

Welcome_hubby

(312 posts)
43. Fidel didn't let USA rape Cuba
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 07:26 AM
Oct 2012

Cuba was like a USA affiliate. Cubans were not having it. Other Latin-American president like Somoza bent over and took it. Not him. Kudos.

obamanut2012

(26,094 posts)
63. That ONLY happened because of the US's cold shoulder
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:29 AM
Oct 2012

Cuba could have and should have been an ally of the US.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
66. Perhaps.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:39 AM
Oct 2012

In any case, his death is necessary for significant change in the relationship. I think both sides are inhibited from big changes while he is still alive. Not wishing for his death mind you - but when it comes hopefully it will herald positive changes for Cuba.

 

Kindly Refrain

(423 posts)
74. I'm just going to come right out and ask.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:12 PM
Oct 2012

Are you a rightwinger? I've read quite a few of your posts.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
163. Considering 40% of Democrats own guns
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 06:38 PM
Oct 2012

I think your bias is showing.

Or are you a small tent Democrat?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
77. No - a die in the wool Democrat from a long line of blue collar Democrats
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:27 PM
Oct 2012

I have never voted for a Repuke in my life. I am active in my local party organization and election campaigns.

I support abortion rights, marriage equality, and single payer health care.

I am simply more moderate than you would like. I also suspect my support for gun rights shades your opinion of me.

Paladin

(28,269 posts)
84. So In Other Words.....
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:36 PM
Oct 2012

...you think I ought to be forbidden from buying Cuban-made Romeo y Julieta cigars, because Castro is such a bad guy----but you think it's your constitutional right to acquire AK-47 rifles built in Russia, China, East Berlin, or Cambodia? Is that the sort of anti-communism you're preaching, here?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
87. I oppose any sanctions on Cuba
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:01 PM
Oct 2012

I think that there should be unfettered trade and travel between the two countries. That is how Cuba will change for the better.

I am not anti-Communist. I oppose any and all authoritarian leaders, whether on the left or the right.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
91. but it's only guns and sometimes taxes that you get really animated about
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 02:48 PM
Oct 2012

you and I have both been here a long time.

most of us here truly and vocally worried when health care was at stake.

we were aghast when they tried to privatize social security.

we went crazy when they tried to stop the expansion of s-chip which would cover millions of children with health care.

the issue we have with gungeoners are the ones, and there are many, that express little emotion about any issue other than guns and government spending.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
94. But guns are not a purely RW issue so I don't see your point
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 03:47 PM
Oct 2012

40% of Democrats say they own guns. I am one of them.


On edit: what bought me to DU initially was the 9/11 Forum on DU2. I had a blast arguing with Truthers - the threads were technical, passionate and dynamic. A great opportunity hone my logic and writing skills. The point is I am not a "me too" kind of poster - if I see a thread that I agree with I usually nod my head and move on. I join in when I think I have something factual to add or if I disagree with the facts and logic being presented. I particular dislike threads motivated by emotion and not much more - which usually puts me in the contrarian position when I challenge people on issues like gun control or basic economics. I am here for discussion - not validation.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
118. So Casto would have rejected single party rule with some American love and money?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:40 AM
Oct 2012

Or are you saying he would have merely been another American supported authoritarian? And that is OK with you?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
140. You are the one rationalizing authoritarian one party rule
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:42 PM
Oct 2012

I am just trying to figure out what was necessary for Cuba to avoid it. You are implying that the US is partially to blame.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
117. So America force Cuba to send it's armies to fight in Africa?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:38 AM
Oct 2012

Castro would have rejected Marxism and support for wars of liberation given some American love? Really?

And here I was thinking that Castro was motivated by principles when it was pure circumstance after all. America could have bought him off and made Cuba a western style democracy.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
44. and of course the US policy of burying Cuba has nothing to do with anything
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 07:41 AM
Oct 2012

It was all Castro's fault. How sad lame and reminiscent of the fucking 60's cold war jingoism.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
47. Hmmm. I seem to recall the Cuban people were just as bad off before Castro...
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 08:05 AM
Oct 2012

Remember Fulgencio Batista from Cuban history? You know, the guy that overthrew the previous Cuban government in 1933 and eventually became a REALLY bad dictator? You do understand that the Cubans who fled to the US following Castro's takeover in 1959 were Batista supporters?

What do you know about the support that was given to Castro by the CIA to help him overthrow the Batista dictatorship? A guy by the name of Frank Sturgis was involved in providing that help....remember him from the Watergate break-in?

What do you know about Castro asking for monetary support and other supplies from the Eisenhower Administration in 1959 and was turned down? Did you know that Castro then turned to the Soviet Union for help which they gladly supplied? Did you know that Eisenhower ordered then CIA Director Allen Dulles to train Cuban exiles for a covert invasion of Cuba in March 1960? Did you know Nixon was heavily involved in the planning for what later became the Bay of Pigs fiasco under JFK?

And when all of the US programs failed to overthrow and/or kill Castro, we slapped them with major sanctions that resulted in denying the Cuban people the things they needed for surviving day-to-day. Most of those sanctions are still in place. So, tell me again who is to blame for the economic condition of Cuba. Tell me why Cubans might be suspicious of American travelers in their country.

Oh, by the way, you never saw the old Soviet Union following the Russian Revolution in 1917. They were in far worse economic straits at that point in time than the Cubans after Castro took over in 1959. What you saw in Russia in the 1990s was a direct result of the failed war in Afghanistan , the complete collapse of the old Soviet financial system, and the dissolution of the old Soviet Union. You were followed by Russian police, but it would have been far worse if the old Soviet Union had still existed.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
52. The heirs of Fulgencio Batista thank you for your support.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 08:26 AM
Oct 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulgencio_Batista

Back in power, Batista suspended the 1940 Constitution and revoked most political liberties, including the right to strike. He then aligned with the wealthiest landowners who owned the largest sugar plantations, and presided over a stagnating economy that widened the gap between rich and poor Cubans. Batista's increasingly corrupt and repressive regime then began to systematically profit from the exploitation of Cuba's commercial interests, by negotiating lucrative relationships with the American mafia, who controlled the drug, gambling, and prostitution businesses in Havana, and with large multinational American corporations that had invested considerable amounts of money in Cuba. To quell the growing discontent amongst the populace—which was subsequently displayed through frequent student riots and demonstrations—Batista established tighter censorship of the media, while also utilizing his anti-Communist secret police to carry out wide-scale violence, torture and public executions; ultimately killing anywhere from 1,000 to 20,000 people.

Mayer Lansky and the boys send their greetings as well.

Zen Democrat

(5,901 posts)
54. Castro will die in old age. I don't get the celebrating. He kinda won.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 08:31 AM
Oct 2012

And he's not been in charge for several years -- Raul Castro is.

Paladin

(28,269 posts)
56. Our Stupid Blockade Has Kept Castro In Power For Decades.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 08:55 AM
Oct 2012

Castro couldn't have asked for better help than what our backward policies provided.

obamanut2012

(26,094 posts)
59. I find your OP header extrememly inappropriate
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:17 AM
Oct 2012

And your OP body doesn't match the reality of several people I know who have spent considerable time in Cuba. It also doesn't match the facts. I also have family members who worked in pre-Castro Cuba, and one who never voted for a liberal in his life said he would have embraced Castro, too, because non-Batista Elite Cubans were slaves (often literally) of the US Mob, the Cuban Elite, and US corporations.

I also doubt you spent any time driving in the Soviet Union, since I believe you are only in your 30's or s, right? And, there is no such monolithic place as the "former Soviet Union." Pshaw.

I do give you a point for not mentioning Elian Gonzales, but took it away since you didn't mention how many Batista families have turned parts of Florida into a Fascist state

GObamaGO

(665 posts)
64. Last I checked the Cold War was over
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:32 AM
Oct 2012

And what others have said about pre-Castro Cuba...(mobsters and exploitation for US gain).

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
71. you were in the USSR before the mid-80s?
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 11:54 AM
Oct 2012

because by then there was Glasnost and that meant far more freedom of expression than before --in fact, this freedom is one of the things that led up to the dissolution of the Soviet Union by 1991, that is the freedom to openly oppose the government, vote against it, etc.

How could you have been there in the 90s? --history doesn't support your picture of the USSR in the 90's, in fact it was dissolved in 1991...I'll never forget that, I was in San Diego with my family on vacation and we saw it on TV, in a moment, Gorbachev was no longer in power or effectively had no control.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
81. Paging Mika --
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:54 PM
Oct 2012

DUer Mika has spent a helluva lot more time there than you over many years. Her experience of Cuba was different. People in Cuba have it worse than some, but better than many others, including a whole lot of Americans.

Fidel gave us the chance to work with him back in the day, we said "no". Our embargo continues to be one of the more stupid foreign policy decisions our country has ever made.

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
86. The Mafia ruined Youngstown
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 01:41 PM
Oct 2012

I saw discos burned when they didn't pay protection. A policeman was killed and no killer was ever discovered. My friend the judge was shot. The turned recreational drugs into a racket. The mills had a numbers racket. You could get a traffic ticket fixed if you knew the right guy. The sheriff took bribes from the mafia and then the mafia bought the jury to clear him.

People deserve better.

Dr Fate

(32,189 posts)
98. How many products made in Red China have you bought this week?
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 05:07 PM
Oct 2012

This month? This year? Were you proudly wearing your Chinese commie made gear on your visit to cuba?

Take any photos with a Red-Chinese made camera or I-phone, perhaps?

Just saying. I've never met a man who cried "evil commies!!!!" who was not dressed from head to toe in the latest Chinese communist made fashions.

Maybe you will be the 1st to break the streak?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
181. That's an excellent insight. And, thanks for posting it.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:00 PM
Oct 2012

We Americans are ALL supporting the Chinese these days. As long as they supply Walmart on up to our most exclusive 1%'er stores ....we are happy dealing with the "former" RED CHINESE...but CUBA....OMG...DAMNED DICTATOR! LOL's the hypocrites we are.

upi402

(16,854 posts)
107. There is always a helluva storm in that little teapot
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 09:51 PM
Oct 2012

whew, makes ya wonder where all the anger comes from. hhmmmm

hack89

(39,171 posts)
106. I disagree
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 09:48 PM
Oct 2012

He is such a huge symbol that no Cuban leader would propose undoing Castro's system while he is still alive. The Cuban people have no opportunity for meaningful democratic change until he is dead.

 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
108. I like Fidel. Sure his economics might not be that good but he saved Cuba from US imperialism.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 10:19 PM
Oct 2012

He kicked the mob and United Fruit out and gave the people free k-college education and universal healthcare which we don't have here. People forget that Batista was just as bad on civil rights in Cuba if not worse raping and torturing people. He also helped fight apartide South Africa and help to export revolution around the world and generally stood against American puppet states. The reality is that most of the suffering in Cuba is the result of the embargo and not Castro's policies. If that embargo was lifted life would get better for the average Cuban. It's not like Fidel wakes up everyday and thinks how can I make the people suffer more. There's alot more going on there than what is seen by the average tourist.

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
110. Yes, because Batista's mass murders, genocide of Blacks and the Wests rape and pillage of Cuba...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:19 AM
Oct 2012

was okay. Castro did not cause any of those things in Cuba---they were caused by embargoes forced onto Cuba why the US government when Castro stated he would not allow privatized companies and casinos to run amok. Imagine would Cuba would be if US agreed to Castro's position and did not thrust an extremely rigid embargo on the nation for the last 50+ years.

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
122. Oh so all of those things are okay?! By your estimation, then?!
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:24 AM
Oct 2012

Because the real evil is one man ruling? If Castro never came into power---Black Cubans would have ONLY one job...clearing the cane fields. They would never have jobs, the women would have to deal with continous rape. You think that would go away? It had no chance of going away. Cuba wouldn't have the highest rate of extremely qualified doctors. Do you know if you speak Spanish and you are a minority you can go to Cuba and get free education to becoming a medical doctor.

What is the problem with one man ruling if he is not advocating mass murder and abuse? A monarchy is not really a problem until the monarch is abusing it's citizenry. Even in "democratic" nations we see plenty of that. America is not as bad as Haiti...but let's just say if Josh Romney's hands in voting machines means anything or the Koch Brother's power---money in democracy has enough issues.

Again...you know nothing, absolutely nothing about the history of the nation except what you've been fed by the media.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
124. So dictators who don't indulge in mass murder are ok with you? Wow!!
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:29 AM
Oct 2012

multi-party democracy is the ideal for one simple reason - it allows the people control over their lives and their countries.

JCMach1

(27,566 posts)
121. Cuba was a poor Carribean nation before Castro and will be after...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:20 AM
Oct 2012

His legacy, however, is a complex one

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
123. I cannot share with your enthusiasm about a human suffering, even if he doesn't feel anything
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:27 AM
Oct 2012

I hope the people of Cuba achieve a better life in this generation.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
128. I suppose the OP would rather Cuba was still run by Batista and Meyer Lansky?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:37 AM
Oct 2012

I sometimes wonder why such Right-wingers continue to haunt this place.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
130. No third option?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 01:38 PM
Oct 2012

perhaps the OP wanted the people of Cuba to enjoy free multi-party elections with a free press. Not liking Castro does not imply support for Batista. There is plenty of room to condemn both.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
131. Without Castro, Cuba would probably be similar to the Dominican Republic. Press not free there,
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 01:49 PM
Oct 2012

either. The threat to freedoms in the DR, like much of the market economies of Latin America, is from corrupt officials and the real bosses, drug cartels and organized crime, just like Batista's days. Take your pick. http://en.rsf.org/report-dominican-republic,190.html

Physical attacks against the media declined a little in 2009 but they are still frequent. Although a major tourism destination, the Dominican Republic continues to be prey to persistent corruption while its geographical location means it is much used as a drug-trafficking way station. It is dangerous for news media to look too closely at these issues, especially as the reprisals are often carried out by municipal officials or police officers.

The especially menacing threat to journalists from the drug cartels can come from just about anywhere. Manuel Vega, a reporter and producer for the privately-owned Canal 10-Varo Visión TV station and radio 95.5 FM in Hato Mayor province, received “warnings” from two imprisoned drug traffickers at the start of 2009.

Freedom of expression continues to be fragile. The privately-owned TV station Canal 53 Cibao TV Club was controversially closed on the orders of the Dominican Telecommunications Institute (Indotel) on 25 March 2010, shortly after presenter Ernesto Fadul criticised President Leonel Fernández and other government officials. The grounds given were “illegal broadcasting.” Closure is the worst possible way to punish a TV station for comments that could be considered defamatory or for the illegal use of frequencies.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
132. So Latin America requires strongmen to prosper? True democracy is a hindrance to be avoided?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 02:20 PM
Oct 2012

interesting perspective.

Does that only apply to LW strongmen or are RW strongmen Ok as well?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
133. Caudillos aren't my preferred form of governance - true democracy may exist in Iceland
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 03:57 PM
Oct 2012

or Barbados, or something close to it on a few other small island states. The DR isn't really a True Democracy, nor is the US or any state where we have intervened to bring our preferred form of corporate multinational rule. Certainly not Libya. Certainly not Iraq, or any of the other recent poster children for "freedom and democracy."

Perhaps, after several decades following our departure and that of our appointed strongmen, as in Chile, there is some improvement.

Historically, the U.S. has scored pretty low in bringing "true democracy" in this and every other hemisphere we've touched.

3 FULGENCIO BATISTA
President of Cuba

Cuban Army Sergeant Fulgencio Batiste, first seized power in a 1932 coup. He was FDR's handpicked dictator to counteract leftists who had overthrown strongman Gerardo Machado, "the Butcher". Batista ruled for several years, then left for Miami, returning in 1952 just in time for another coup, against elected president Carlos Prio Socorras. His new regime was recognized in a flash by President Eisenhower.
Under Batista, U.S. interests flourished and little was said about democracy. With the loyal support of Batista, Mafioso boss Meyer Lansky developed Havana into an international drug port. Cabinet offices were bought and sold and military officials made huge sums on smuggling and vice rackets. Havana became a fashionable hot spot where America's rich and famous clinked cocktails with mobsters.
As the gap between the rich and poor grew wider, the poor grew impatient. In 1953, Fidel Castro led an armed group of rebels in a failed uprising on the Moncada army barracks. Fidel temporarily fled the country and Batista struck back with a vengeance. Freedom of speech was curtailed and "subversive" teachers, lawyers and public officials were fired from their jobs. Death squads tortured and killed thousands of "communists." Batista was assisted in his crackdown by Lansky and other members of organized crime who believed Castro would jeopardize their gambling and drug trade. Despite this, Batista remained a friend to Eisenhower and the U.S. until he was finally overthrown by Castro in 1959.

4 - Rafael Leonidas Trujillo

4 RAFAEL LEONIDAS TRUJILLO
President of the Dominican Republic
The U.S. occupied the Dominican Republic in 1916 and created the National Guardto put Rafael Leonidas "The Chief" Trujillo into power. The fact that Trujillo was court-martialed for kidnapping and rape in 1920 did not impede his rise to power or taint his relationship with the U.S. As dictator of the Dominican Republic for 30 years, Trujillo had a penchant for self-adulation, naming the country's capital "Ciudad Trujillo" and likening himself to Jesus Christ. He also put his personal stamp on everything. On village water pumps: "Trujillo alone gives us water to drink." On a home for the aged: "Trujillo is the only one who gives us shelter."
Trujillo won the 1930 presidential election with more votes than there were registered voters, but as long as he was anti-communist, Washington was happy, so he invoked anti-communism to justify mass deportations, torture and summary execution. Workers who asked for wage increases were labelled "communists" and shot on the spot, as were farmers who tried to stop Trujillo from confiscating their land. He eventually controlled over 80% of the country's sugar plantations, using slave labor provided by neighboring Haiti to keep profits high, but in 1937 he decided to blame depressed sugar prices on the Haitian workers and massacred 20,000 of them. Trujillo was finally assassinated by the CIA in 1961, after he attempted to have President Romulo Betancourt of Venezuela murdered because of his criticism of Trujillo's brutal regime. It was only then that the Marine Corps made public the fact that our "ally" Trujillo was a convicted rapist!

hack89

(39,171 posts)
142. There has been no US imposed strong man in Cuba for 60 years
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:47 PM
Oct 2012

it would appear that the absence of US influence does not lead to democracy or freedom. Oh well - perhaps there will be a Havana Spring to clear the ground and start over.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
143. Exactly.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:52 PM
Oct 2012

I'm sure that when Fidel finally passes, the pace of change will pick up. Change may or may not be for the better, nevertheless. Depends upon who you talk to in Cuba or Little Havana.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
146. Do you think the Cuban people should be given a real say in what change is made?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:57 PM
Oct 2012

should the Cuban Communist Party renounce it's monopoly on political power and invite the formation of other political parties with no restrictions?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
150. Up to the authoritarian government to give? Or for the people to take?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 05:08 PM
Oct 2012

there is no role for us. I suspect another revolution is the only true answer.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
170. Ohhhh... The world will get used to many MORE Che's as we go forward with Wall Street Bankers. n/t
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:21 PM
Oct 2012

hack89

(39,171 posts)
177. Considering his unbroken string of failure
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:43 PM
Oct 2012

following the revolution, that could be seen as good or bad.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
165. They will do it. Two out of three of the demands of the Varela Project have been met.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:00 PM
Oct 2012

They have returned to privatization and they are about to release the travel restrictions.

All that's left now is the ability to campaign freely and end the community party monopoly.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
164. I dispute that. Cuba wasn't occupied like DR.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 06:58 PM
Oct 2012

Many forget that Batista was supported by the communists in Cuba and duly elected. The problem was that he couldn't get reelected and formed a coup to stay in power.

Ironically this is why the Cuban electoral process is so quaint. It allows those in power to remain in power indefinitely so that they don't have to have coups. They simply just retain power because the people by law are not allowed to have much ability to choose anyone else.

Had they simply followed the 1940 constitution Cuba would be highly prosperous right now, but it required Batistas ouster since after the coup his hard hand was very Pinochet-esque.

Cuba may have become the Las Vegas of the Americas by now.

obamanut2012

(26,094 posts)
137. I am wondering why the OP never revisited this thread
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:24 PM
Oct 2012

Although he appears to have posted in other threads since he started this OP.

I really dislike drive by OPs.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
152. Maybe he and Tom Clancy are having a reunion.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 05:12 PM
Oct 2012

I must say, Fidel looks pretty good for a guy in a neurovegetative state. Perhaps that phrase actually means "abnormally perky looking senior citizen": http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1594594

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
172. Did you even read the OP?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:27 PM
Oct 2012

Accusing the rest of us of anti-socialist witch hunts in a thread that wishes *death* on a socialist leader is a level of irony that plunges to new depths. Congratulations. Might want to adjust your aim on the McCarthy ray there, KoKo.

And as a Communist? I find your repeated misuse of that term on DU really offensive. I have comrades that actually had their lives destroyed by that shit. Being hectored on a message board doesn't even rise to hangnail levels of fuss. Please.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
187. Links please for my "repeated misuse of that term" here on DU....
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:17 PM
Oct 2012

I think you have me confused with someone else.

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
145. I lived in a dictatorship for five years...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 04:55 PM
Oct 2012

Whatever approach they take to economics and social policy, I'm not going to shed a tear for a dictator's demise.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
171. Really? What in your opinion is definition of "Dictator?" What definition do you use to judge?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:23 PM
Oct 2012
Would love to hear what you think about this.

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
173. A dictator chooses to rule without any regard for democratic process...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:29 PM
Oct 2012

...in my case I was in the Philippines, when Ferdinand Marcos declared Martial Law, suspended the Constitution, dissolved the legislature, imposed Government censorship on all forms of media, and ruled by decree for the 25 years.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
178. Well we've seen a taste of that with BUSH II...but it's been a progression that's gone on
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:52 PM
Oct 2012

here in subtle "step-by-steps" for awhile now.

If you only think this stuff could happen under Marcos...well...I think you've read enough history that you know that Marcos was not unique in world history.

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
184. NO - WE - HAVE - NOT
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:02 PM
Oct 2012

The last time I checked, we took control of the House and Senate during Bush II's second term. We also blocked his plan to privatize Social Security.

Whatever you think about Bush's transgressions, he was NOT a Dictator (at least not to anyone who's experienced one).

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
179. Wait, haven't you posted about being a 1%er before?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:55 PM
Oct 2012

Why the everloving heck should any of the rest of us listen to your approach to economics?

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
180. So, because I'm financially well off...
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 07:59 PM
Oct 2012

...it's okay to support someone who denies political rights to others?

I'd be delighted to have you explain the linkage.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
186. Since the offense appears to be denying political domination to you and yours, and actually giving a
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:06 PM
Oct 2012

voice to everybody else? Your motives are suspect.

brooklynite

(94,679 posts)
189. You DO know your Filipino history, don't you?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:24 PM
Oct 2012

The Marcos dictatorship was a crony capitalist system where the wealthy did very well, and was strongly supported by the Nixon and Reagan Administrations. But don't that get in the way of your biases.

JanMichael

(24,890 posts)
154. Oh, Bullshit. The Candadian and European tourists there
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 05:35 PM
Oct 2012

never reported crap like this. I have heard this silly assed crap before; I doubt you were even there.

marmar

(77,086 posts)
183. "May Cuba break free from the chains of communism."
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:01 PM
Oct 2012

So we can put them in the chains of contemporary corporate capitalism.


KoKo

(84,711 posts)
188. Right ON! Exactly....!
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:19 PM
Oct 2012

Seems some folks on this thread don't understand the difference in what Castro has done and their ideology that can't get over it. He doesn't fit in "the box" they want to put him in.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
191. Why couldn't it be done with free and open elections?
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:27 PM
Oct 2012

and a free press? And the right to travel?

Social Democracy works just fine in some European countries.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
195. Yes - a man of color won a free and open election
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:43 PM
Oct 2012

upsetting the status quo and giving hope to billions around the world.

That's what I saw. What about you?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fidel Castro is near a ne...