General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFidel Castro is near a neurovegetative state from a stroke. Good.
In the 90s I was lucky enough to spend a month in a rental car, driving around the entire island of Cuba. The people were warm and wonderful, thrilled to meet an American. We were treated so well by the people but throughout our visit the police would stop us, would arrest people who were talking to us, they took my friend away leaving me stranded at 4 in the morning in a slum on the far reaches of Havana.
I was also able to spend almost the same amount of time in the former Soviet Union. I made it as far as Moscow before my VISA expired. There too the people were wonderful and the police followed me everywhere and hassled the people who spoke to me.
But Cuba was much worse than the Soviet Union. The people we met had very little. Their spirits were nearly broken. Fidel Castro and his cronies sucked the life out of those people and that country. I have never seen a country where the government has worked so hard to destroy the will and spirit of their people.
I cheer that Castro is on his death bed. May Cuba break free from the chains of communism.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/10/18/3056621/fidel-castro-suffered-a-stroke.html
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)It would create an economic boost for Cuba and us.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)This is no doubt a right wing rumor, every October there's a new one. Fidel's son said he's fine and working on a book.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Comparing Cuba to the United States is a bit silly. When compared to sister nations that enjoy US "protection", it's looks a lot better. Without the embargo, the comparison would be even worse.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)At least everyone is covered. Unlike the US where you simply die without insurance or go bankrupt.
What would it have been like without the embargo? My guess is they would have been much better off.
We deal politically with much worse people than the Castros. We have propped up any number of right-wing dictators, simply because they were not "communist."
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)Probably very similar to Costa Rica, I bet.
DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)that they in this vicious dictatorship in the 90's, they let you roam at will with your rented car, talking to people who were allowed to say bad things about the government --bad enough to get them arrested upon your departure?
curious what kind of car you rented there. must have been pretty good, it got you around the entire island for a month!
deaniac21
(6,747 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)ABC spoke to Dr. José Rafael Marquina, a Venezuelan native who has lived in Florida for the past 20 years. Marquina made a name for himself by publicly analyzing Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's recent bout with cancer. He claims to have sources with information of Chavez's health, and now of Castro's.
ABC reports that Chavez traveled to Cuba yesterday to get a health check-up and to visit Castro (no other media appears to confirm this).
Marquina claims that Castro "has suffered a massive embolism in the right brain artery," and is "dying." It's unclear where exactly Marquina is getting his information, though it's the latest in a string of rumors that Castro's health has seriously declined. The fact he did not publicly congratulate Chavez on his reelection last week further spurred speculation.
Castro hasn't so much as released a public word since June. So, today, state-run newspapers published a letter supposedly written by Castro in which he congratulated doctors graduating from a medical academy. Not everyone is buying that Castro actually wrote the letter. The retired dictator hasn't been seen in public since earlier this year when he greeted the Pope.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)He is a tyrant. But it is not our job to remove him. The Cuban people will have to do that themselves, if they should want to.
And the embargo is an outdated Cold War relic that should be repealed.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Agreed.
We lost over 58,000 Americans in Vietnam, lost the war, yet, we can now buy products make there in our big-box retailers.
I don't recall any American deaths in Cuba but we maintain this embargo?
Doesn't make sense...
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)spend hours on C-SPAN arguing why we need to have open trade with China...it was surreal...
leftstreet
(36,110 posts)I haven't heard that term in years
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)and they weren't afraid to say it.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Funny thing, in nations that actually are run by oppressive dictatorships, the people are afraid to say it. In nations like the Capitalist paragons of Pinochet's Chile or the Argentine junta, criticism of the government got you a gut wound and a high dive into the ocean.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)aquart
(69,014 posts)Think about that.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)out of them & the country" and "destroyed their will & spirit".
and everyone who talked to you was stopped by the police & arrested as well.
ok, whatever.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)and why did he keep talking to people after, i don't know, the first few times this happened?
probably because it didn't happen
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)And yet people felt free enough to criticize him to an outsider?
How are your chains of capitalism feeling this morn?
hack89
(39,171 posts)obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)And has nothing to do with the OP's claim.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I just wanted to throw it out there amidst all this rationalizing of one party authoritarian governments.
0rganism
(23,962 posts)Enjoy those chains of capitalism much?
hack89
(39,171 posts)so don't give me that crap. The Communist Party hand picks who will be elected.
The Communist Party has a complete monopoly on power.
0rganism
(23,962 posts)Very convenient how you left that part out, eh? Nice cherry picking there.
But it's no surprise coming from you, I remember when you took a shit on the longshoremen's strike in Washington. True to character, all the way.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Candidates are selected by Candidacy Commissions .
On edit: That is why the Communist Party does not need to campaign or endorse candidates. They have absolute control of the entire process.
0rganism
(23,962 posts)Seriously, when you quote something, it's just common decency to let people know where you got it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Cuba
There's a lot more to it than your on-edit statement might lead someone to believe.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Show me the mechanism where one could run for president of Cuba. That's right - it is impossible.
I find it so funny how many here support one part authoritarian governments.
hack89
(39,171 posts)where I backed a different union than you did. Yes - I think you might be.
0rganism
(23,962 posts)More to the point, you opposed the ILWU. Big surprise there.
hack89
(39,171 posts)leftstreet
(36,110 posts)It's no surprise you're supporting free marketz capitalism here
hack89
(39,171 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:29 AM - Edit history (1)
I support free market capitalism. They are not mutually exclusive
You are just looking for a way to derail the conversation.
Supporting one party authoritarian governments is certainly not pro-worker.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)oh, wait a minute. Never mind.
ps I had a right-wing Australian boss who visited Cuba; rented a car and drove all around, meeting with the people. He told wonderful stories about the people, and about driving around occasional chickens and cows in the streets. But he didn't come back with any horror stories, though.
TBF
(32,084 posts)moles are out and about enlightening us with their wisdom.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Mainly because of the vanished brain cells...
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)I've spent time in Cuba, too. The people I met had living spirits. Some liked the government, some didn't, some could care less.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)So I guess most of them liked the government.
hack89
(39,171 posts)that's right. Cuba is a one party state where opposing political views are not tolerated.
Every dictatorship has a constitution and elections.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)I think it takes more than 1 trip to Cuba to understand the culture and society.
It's very easy to be a naive gringo stomping around and yelling about human rights in a society you don't understand.
Cubans who engage in befriending tourists can really work it and charm the pants off of a foreigner. The police are heavy handed when they are from the countryside and they overreact but it's for a reason. The foreigner is at a great disadvantage and won't get the game until trip 2, 3, 4 ... some never get it and marry a hustler. The crackdowns that happened ten or so years ago were needed and prostitution is greatly controlled. Now Cubans have access to hotels and tourist areas, it's a healthier situation, but it was simply impossible not to control the situation when it first opened up.
Why don't people consider the history of Cuba when judging. How about the fact that the USA could give a fuck if Cubans suffer due to the embargo. Fidel wanted equality for his people. He will leave a tremendous legacy.
Puregonzo1188
(1,948 posts)when he mentioned the police following him around.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Said by someone dwelling in the "first world" nation with the highest rates of infant mortality, homelessness, lowest life expectancy, worst educational system, and most corrupt economic system, that's pretty fucking laughable.
Tell me another one, Papa McCarthy!
leftstreet
(36,110 posts)Single payer non-profit healthcare in Cuba, but not in the US
The 'chains of Capitalism' is more like it
KansDem
(28,498 posts)And the misspelling was intentional
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)How many Cubans die because they are unable to afford medical attention? Cuba is no paradise - what place is - but it's far from hell on earth.
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)all the phony concern about 'freedom' from the right gets thrown out the window when they go courting China and the Saudis.
Castro looks like a choir boy next to those folks.
The only reason the U.S. policy is so harsh on Cuba is because the Cubans won't let the mafia and the old foreign interests run the place and suck it dry like they did under the dictator Batista.
China lets U.S. companies exploit their people, so, suddenly human rights abuses like Tibet and Tiananmen Square are no longer a concern.
Funny how that works.
Maybe it's time to quit letting the rightwing Batista holdovers in Miami set U.S. policy, and we take steps to benefit the people of both nations.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)groups around including the charming right wing congressmen from Miami who would do all they can to undermine our freedoms here in their obsessive hate of Fidel.
malaise
(269,144 posts)FIdel Castro has done more to uplift his own people than any of the US backed dictators and generals of this hemisphere.
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)crunch60
(1,412 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)People in Haiti, Jamaica... and lots of other places might start asking why they don't have the things Cubans have.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)not very.
flamingdem
(39,316 posts)Not so much outside of that though as his cache is reduced lately along with his visibility.
Name another figure as important in the history of Latin America? Bolivar?
In terms of the USA he is hugely important as well. Name another country that stood up to US domination in this hemisphere?
Well we'll see what happens but there is still a leftward tilt in Latin America and a lot of respect for Cuba and Fidel's legacy.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)hope this rumor is not true.
What is amazing is people speaking about things that are not true and the same people here and there that don't like the rightwing press, somehow love the rightwing press about Mr. Castro.
I think if one loves Jeb and George Bush & Marco Rubio, one hates Castro
and the same people still think the USSR is alive and well too
I do like that slowly the embargo is going and travel is allowed.I for one would love to legally be able to visit and spend my tourist money there.
It is OUR embargo from prior decades that is enslaving the people who live there, not Mr. Castro.
(one of the things I hope will change after our President no longer needs to run again when he wins in a few weeks).
aquart
(69,014 posts)Us, our mobs, our dealers. We loved that place. All those nice Cuban servants.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)We seem to have forgotten what pre-Castro Cuba was like.
After World War II, American mobster Lucky Luciano was paroled from prison on the condition that he permanently return to Sicily. Luciano secretly moved to Cuba, where he worked to resume control over American Mafia operations. Luciano also ran a number of casinos in Cuba with the sanction of Batista, though the American government eventually succeeded in pressuring the Batista regime to deport him.[34]
Batista encouraged large-scale gambling in Havana. In 1955, he announced that Cuba would grant a gaming license to anyone who invested US$1 million in a hotel or $200,000 in a new nightcluband that the government would provide matching public funds for construction, a 10-year tax exemption, and waive duties on imported equipment and furnishings for new hotels. Each casino would pay the government $250,000 for the license, plus a percentage of the profits. The policy omitted background checks, as required for casino operations in the United States, which opened the door for casino investors with illegally obtained funds. Cuban contractors with the right connections made windfalls by importing, duty-free, more materials than needed for new hotels and selling the surplus to others. It was rumored that, besides the $250,000 to obtain a license, an additional "under the table" fee was sometimes required.[35]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulgencio_Batista#Relationship_with_organized_crime
aquart
(69,014 posts)There's total amnesia in the media for those glad (for the US) times.
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)only kings or dictators rule for 60 years and I don't see a crown on Castro's head.
aquart
(69,014 posts)Please list their other choices.
hack89
(39,171 posts)give the Cuban people actual choices.
I am constantly astounded how many here support and rationalize LW authoritarian leaders while condeming RW authoritarians. The hypocrisy is mind bending.
leftstreet
(36,110 posts)I am constantly astounded by how many here equate democracy with capitalism
hack89
(39,171 posts)shall we list all the things Cubans do not have?
leftstreet
(36,110 posts)As if it actually means something or is even relevant here
hack89
(39,171 posts)Dictators are bad - except when they are good.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)brooklynite
(94,679 posts)vaberella
(24,634 posts)Particularly under Batista to even think that Batista and Castro are comparable. It's like comparing Hitler and Lincoln.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Castro did more and lasting damage to Cuba than Batista did - he squandered the opportunity to make Cuba free and prosperous. He choose a different path.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)The country was overrun by US and foreign casinos. Yes, Castro did worse by turning those casino's into schools. Batista was allowing raping and killing of Black Cubans---Castro stopped that and it was one of the things that enraged him into revolting against Batista. Yes...Castro was an evil by wanting to stop the genocide of all his people. What lasting damage did Castro do? What lasting "damage" that he did that was not influenced by US foreign policy laws?! Tell me. Actually he did not squandered it. He wanted to protect it. Why am I debating this shit with you? When it's obvious you know nothing about the situation.
What different path did Castro do? Because he stopped US privatizing Cuban electricity?! Really? Because he stopped US privatizing water in Cuba? Really? You've got to be kidding me. To me, you sound like you would shit on Lincoln.
hack89
(39,171 posts)at any time in the past 60 years? Is that what you are saying? Or are you saying that one party authoritarian rule is ok?
Condemning Castro is not supporting Batista.
amborin
(16,631 posts)We wouldn't have the UAW, IE, etc. if it hadn't been for their leadership and willingness to challenge capitalist domination.
That aside, one of the many unforgiveable things about Castro was how he had one of Cuba's top generals executed on trumped up charges. The general had had many successes in Angola, and returned to Cuba a war hero. This was simply too threatening to Castro.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Many DUer's have remarked that they've been to Cuba. I would like to go sometime but thought it was off limits. What's the procedure for traveling there?
Oh, and that Scott DesJarlais is one sleazy dude!
B Calm
(28,762 posts)but that was in the US Navy and I never got to leave Gitmo Navy base.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)I have a friend who lives in Switzerland. He comes through my "neck of the woods" every once in a while and will bring me a box of Cuban cigars that he's purchased in a Swiss tobacco shop.
I like smoking them, but it's such a convoluted way of getting them.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)I seen them for sale up there, but they're pricey.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Northern Idaho.
The next time I visit her I might take a side trip up north to purchase a few.
Awful long way to go to smoke a Havana!
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Or so I have heard. I'm more of a "hiking in the mountains" kind of vacationer.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)The Soviet Union dissolved in 1992. So if you were really there, you were about ten years old. Get help.
TBF
(32,084 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)I just kept thinking "sack lunches."
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)To me.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)we're #1 and truly exceptional and our poop doesn't stink. Rah! Rah!
H2O Man
(73,581 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)H2O Man
(73,581 posts)a noble attempt to make Castro's beard fall out, which would have brought peace, harmony, properity, and the Christian-Capitalism system to Cuba. They might have had Pat Boone, but instead fell under the influence of the Beatles (beards, again, by no coincidence).
Had the CIA have had binders of females-of-the-opposite-sex, they could have applied eye-shadow and perhaps hairy high-lights to Infide Castro. Much better than having a world leader who had eyes like Yoko.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)Compared to our wonderful for profit health care system. Ah, the blessings of capitalism.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)Welcome_hubby
(312 posts)Cuba was like a USA affiliate. Cubans were not having it. Other Latin-American president like Somoza bent over and took it. Not him. Kudos.
hack89
(39,171 posts)obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)Cuba could have and should have been an ally of the US.
hack89
(39,171 posts)In any case, his death is necessary for significant change in the relationship. I think both sides are inhibited from big changes while he is still alive. Not wishing for his death mind you - but when it comes hopefully it will herald positive changes for Cuba.
Kindly Refrain
(423 posts)Are you a rightwinger? I've read quite a few of your posts.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)which is probably a sufficient answer.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I think your bias is showing.
Or are you a small tent Democrat?
hack89
(39,171 posts)I have never voted for a Repuke in my life. I am active in my local party organization and election campaigns.
I support abortion rights, marriage equality, and single payer health care.
I am simply more moderate than you would like. I also suspect my support for gun rights shades your opinion of me.
Paladin
(28,269 posts)...you think I ought to be forbidden from buying Cuban-made Romeo y Julieta cigars, because Castro is such a bad guy----but you think it's your constitutional right to acquire AK-47 rifles built in Russia, China, East Berlin, or Cambodia? Is that the sort of anti-communism you're preaching, here?
hack89
(39,171 posts)I think that there should be unfettered trade and travel between the two countries. That is how Cuba will change for the better.
I am not anti-Communist. I oppose any and all authoritarian leaders, whether on the left or the right.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)you and I have both been here a long time.
most of us here truly and vocally worried when health care was at stake.
we were aghast when they tried to privatize social security.
we went crazy when they tried to stop the expansion of s-chip which would cover millions of children with health care.
the issue we have with gungeoners are the ones, and there are many, that express little emotion about any issue other than guns and government spending.
hack89
(39,171 posts)40% of Democrats say they own guns. I am one of them.
On edit: what bought me to DU initially was the 9/11 Forum on DU2. I had a blast arguing with Truthers - the threads were technical, passionate and dynamic. A great opportunity hone my logic and writing skills. The point is I am not a "me too" kind of poster - if I see a thread that I agree with I usually nod my head and move on. I join in when I think I have something factual to add or if I disagree with the facts and logic being presented. I particular dislike threads motivated by emotion and not much more - which usually puts me in the contrarian position when I challenge people on issues like gun control or basic economics. I am here for discussion - not validation.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Or are you saying he would have merely been another American supported authoritarian? And that is OK with you?
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)One that looks oddly like the Family of Saud, Putin, and the Chinese government.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I am just trying to figure out what was necessary for Cuba to avoid it. You are implying that the US is partially to blame.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Castro would have rejected Marxism and support for wars of liberation given some American love? Really?
And here I was thinking that Castro was motivated by principles when it was pure circumstance after all. America could have bought him off and made Cuba a western style democracy.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)It was all Castro's fault. How sad lame and reminiscent of the fucking 60's cold war jingoism.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)Remember Fulgencio Batista from Cuban history? You know, the guy that overthrew the previous Cuban government in 1933 and eventually became a REALLY bad dictator? You do understand that the Cubans who fled to the US following Castro's takeover in 1959 were Batista supporters?
What do you know about the support that was given to Castro by the CIA to help him overthrow the Batista dictatorship? A guy by the name of Frank Sturgis was involved in providing that help....remember him from the Watergate break-in?
What do you know about Castro asking for monetary support and other supplies from the Eisenhower Administration in 1959 and was turned down? Did you know that Castro then turned to the Soviet Union for help which they gladly supplied? Did you know that Eisenhower ordered then CIA Director Allen Dulles to train Cuban exiles for a covert invasion of Cuba in March 1960? Did you know Nixon was heavily involved in the planning for what later became the Bay of Pigs fiasco under JFK?
And when all of the US programs failed to overthrow and/or kill Castro, we slapped them with major sanctions that resulted in denying the Cuban people the things they needed for surviving day-to-day. Most of those sanctions are still in place. So, tell me again who is to blame for the economic condition of Cuba. Tell me why Cubans might be suspicious of American travelers in their country.
Oh, by the way, you never saw the old Soviet Union following the Russian Revolution in 1917. They were in far worse economic straits at that point in time than the Cubans after Castro took over in 1959. What you saw in Russia in the 1990s was a direct result of the failed war in Afghanistan , the complete collapse of the old Soviet financial system, and the dissolution of the old Soviet Union. You were followed by Russian police, but it would have been far worse if the old Soviet Union had still existed.
Iggo
(47,563 posts)TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)People who rail about communism live in the past.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Mayer Lansky and the boys send their greetings as well.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)And he's not been in charge for several years -- Raul Castro is.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Their commie propaganda back.
Paladin
(28,269 posts)Castro couldn't have asked for better help than what our backward policies provided.
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)And your OP body doesn't match the reality of several people I know who have spent considerable time in Cuba. It also doesn't match the facts. I also have family members who worked in pre-Castro Cuba, and one who never voted for a liberal in his life said he would have embraced Castro, too, because non-Batista Elite Cubans were slaves (often literally) of the US Mob, the Cuban Elite, and US corporations.
I also doubt you spent any time driving in the Soviet Union, since I believe you are only in your 30's or s, right? And, there is no such monolithic place as the "former Soviet Union." Pshaw.
I do give you a point for not mentioning Elian Gonzales, but took it away since you didn't mention how many Batista families have turned parts of Florida into a Fascist state
GObamaGO
(665 posts)And what others have said about pre-Castro Cuba...(mobsters and exploitation for US gain).
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)And buh bye.
CorBlimeyGuvnor
(105 posts)Prometheus Bound
(3,489 posts)vaberella
(24,634 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)because by then there was Glasnost and that meant far more freedom of expression than before --in fact, this freedom is one of the things that led up to the dissolution of the Soviet Union by 1991, that is the freedom to openly oppose the government, vote against it, etc.
How could you have been there in the 90s? --history doesn't support your picture of the USSR in the 90's, in fact it was dissolved in 1991...I'll never forget that, I was in San Diego with my family on vacation and we saw it on TV, in a moment, Gorbachev was no longer in power or effectively had no control.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)DUer Mika has spent a helluva lot more time there than you over many years. Her experience of Cuba was different. People in Cuba have it worse than some, but better than many others, including a whole lot of Americans.
Fidel gave us the chance to work with him back in the day, we said "no". Our embargo continues to be one of the more stupid foreign policy decisions our country has ever made.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)I need to change careers.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)I saw discos burned when they didn't pay protection. A policeman was killed and no killer was ever discovered. My friend the judge was shot. The turned recreational drugs into a racket. The mills had a numbers racket. You could get a traffic ticket fixed if you knew the right guy. The sheriff took bribes from the mafia and then the mafia bought the jury to clear him.
People deserve better.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)This month? This year? Were you proudly wearing your Chinese commie made gear on your visit to cuba?
Take any photos with a Red-Chinese made camera or I-phone, perhaps?
Just saying. I've never met a man who cried "evil commies!!!!" who was not dressed from head to toe in the latest Chinese communist made fashions.
Maybe you will be the 1st to break the streak?
KoKo
(84,711 posts)We Americans are ALL supporting the Chinese these days. As long as they supply Walmart on up to our most exclusive 1%'er stores ....we are happy dealing with the "former" RED CHINESE...but CUBA....OMG...DAMNED DICTATOR! LOL's the hypocrites we are.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)flamingdem
(39,316 posts)upi402
(16,854 posts)whew, makes ya wonder where all the anger comes from. hhmmmm
LiberalFighter
(51,020 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)He is such a huge symbol that no Cuban leader would propose undoing Castro's system while he is still alive. The Cuban people have no opportunity for meaningful democratic change until he is dead.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)He kicked the mob and United Fruit out and gave the people free k-college education and universal healthcare which we don't have here. People forget that Batista was just as bad on civil rights in Cuba if not worse raping and torturing people. He also helped fight apartide South Africa and help to export revolution around the world and generally stood against American puppet states. The reality is that most of the suffering in Cuba is the result of the embargo and not Castro's policies. If that embargo was lifted life would get better for the average Cuban. It's not like Fidel wakes up everyday and thinks how can I make the people suffer more. There's alot more going on there than what is seen by the average tourist.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)was okay. Castro did not cause any of those things in Cuba---they were caused by embargoes forced onto Cuba why the US government when Castro stated he would not allow privatized companies and casinos to run amok. Imagine would Cuba would be if US agreed to Castro's position and did not thrust an extremely rigid embargo on the nation for the last 50+ years.
hack89
(39,171 posts)vaberella
(24,634 posts)Because the real evil is one man ruling? If Castro never came into power---Black Cubans would have ONLY one job...clearing the cane fields. They would never have jobs, the women would have to deal with continous rape. You think that would go away? It had no chance of going away. Cuba wouldn't have the highest rate of extremely qualified doctors. Do you know if you speak Spanish and you are a minority you can go to Cuba and get free education to becoming a medical doctor.
What is the problem with one man ruling if he is not advocating mass murder and abuse? A monarchy is not really a problem until the monarch is abusing it's citizenry. Even in "democratic" nations we see plenty of that. America is not as bad as Haiti...but let's just say if Josh Romney's hands in voting machines means anything or the Koch Brother's power---money in democracy has enough issues.
Again...you know nothing, absolutely nothing about the history of the nation except what you've been fed by the media.
hack89
(39,171 posts)multi-party democracy is the ideal for one simple reason - it allows the people control over their lives and their countries.
hack89
(39,171 posts)JCMach1
(27,566 posts)His legacy, however, is a complex one
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I hope the people of Cuba achieve a better life in this generation.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)I sometimes wonder why such Right-wingers continue to haunt this place.
hack89
(39,171 posts)perhaps the OP wanted the people of Cuba to enjoy free multi-party elections with a free press. Not liking Castro does not imply support for Batista. There is plenty of room to condemn both.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)either. The threat to freedoms in the DR, like much of the market economies of Latin America, is from corrupt officials and the real bosses, drug cartels and organized crime, just like Batista's days. Take your pick. http://en.rsf.org/report-dominican-republic,190.html
The especially menacing threat to journalists from the drug cartels can come from just about anywhere. Manuel Vega, a reporter and producer for the privately-owned Canal 10-Varo Visión TV station and radio 95.5 FM in Hato Mayor province, received warnings from two imprisoned drug traffickers at the start of 2009.
Freedom of expression continues to be fragile. The privately-owned TV station Canal 53 Cibao TV Club was controversially closed on the orders of the Dominican Telecommunications Institute (Indotel) on 25 March 2010, shortly after presenter Ernesto Fadul criticised President Leonel Fernández and other government officials. The grounds given were illegal broadcasting. Closure is the worst possible way to punish a TV station for comments that could be considered defamatory or for the illegal use of frequencies.
hack89
(39,171 posts)interesting perspective.
Does that only apply to LW strongmen or are RW strongmen Ok as well?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)or Barbados, or something close to it on a few other small island states. The DR isn't really a True Democracy, nor is the US or any state where we have intervened to bring our preferred form of corporate multinational rule. Certainly not Libya. Certainly not Iraq, or any of the other recent poster children for "freedom and democracy."
Perhaps, after several decades following our departure and that of our appointed strongmen, as in Chile, there is some improvement.
Historically, the U.S. has scored pretty low in bringing "true democracy" in this and every other hemisphere we've touched.
3 FULGENCIO BATISTA
President of Cuba
Cuban Army Sergeant Fulgencio Batiste, first seized power in a 1932 coup. He was FDR's handpicked dictator to counteract leftists who had overthrown strongman Gerardo Machado, "the Butcher". Batista ruled for several years, then left for Miami, returning in 1952 just in time for another coup, against elected president Carlos Prio Socorras. His new regime was recognized in a flash by President Eisenhower.
Under Batista, U.S. interests flourished and little was said about democracy. With the loyal support of Batista, Mafioso boss Meyer Lansky developed Havana into an international drug port. Cabinet offices were bought and sold and military officials made huge sums on smuggling and vice rackets. Havana became a fashionable hot spot where America's rich and famous clinked cocktails with mobsters.
As the gap between the rich and poor grew wider, the poor grew impatient. In 1953, Fidel Castro led an armed group of rebels in a failed uprising on the Moncada army barracks. Fidel temporarily fled the country and Batista struck back with a vengeance. Freedom of speech was curtailed and "subversive" teachers, lawyers and public officials were fired from their jobs. Death squads tortured and killed thousands of "communists." Batista was assisted in his crackdown by Lansky and other members of organized crime who believed Castro would jeopardize their gambling and drug trade. Despite this, Batista remained a friend to Eisenhower and the U.S. until he was finally overthrown by Castro in 1959.
4 - Rafael Leonidas Trujillo
4 RAFAEL LEONIDAS TRUJILLO
President of the Dominican Republic
The U.S. occupied the Dominican Republic in 1916 and created the National Guardto put Rafael Leonidas "The Chief" Trujillo into power. The fact that Trujillo was court-martialed for kidnapping and rape in 1920 did not impede his rise to power or taint his relationship with the U.S. As dictator of the Dominican Republic for 30 years, Trujillo had a penchant for self-adulation, naming the country's capital "Ciudad Trujillo" and likening himself to Jesus Christ. He also put his personal stamp on everything. On village water pumps: "Trujillo alone gives us water to drink." On a home for the aged: "Trujillo is the only one who gives us shelter."
Trujillo won the 1930 presidential election with more votes than there were registered voters, but as long as he was anti-communist, Washington was happy, so he invoked anti-communism to justify mass deportations, torture and summary execution. Workers who asked for wage increases were labelled "communists" and shot on the spot, as were farmers who tried to stop Trujillo from confiscating their land. He eventually controlled over 80% of the country's sugar plantations, using slave labor provided by neighboring Haiti to keep profits high, but in 1937 he decided to blame depressed sugar prices on the Haitian workers and massacred 20,000 of them. Trujillo was finally assassinated by the CIA in 1961, after he attempted to have President Romulo Betancourt of Venezuela murdered because of his criticism of Trujillo's brutal regime. It was only then that the Marine Corps made public the fact that our "ally" Trujillo was a convicted rapist!
hack89
(39,171 posts)it would appear that the absence of US influence does not lead to democracy or freedom. Oh well - perhaps there will be a Havana Spring to clear the ground and start over.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)I'm sure that when Fidel finally passes, the pace of change will pick up. Change may or may not be for the better, nevertheless. Depends upon who you talk to in Cuba or Little Havana.
hack89
(39,171 posts)should the Cuban Communist Party renounce it's monopoly on political power and invite the formation of other political parties with no restrictions?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Certainly not us. That's up to them.
hack89
(39,171 posts)there is no role for us. I suspect another revolution is the only true answer.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)following the revolution, that could be seen as good or bad.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)They have returned to privatization and they are about to release the travel restrictions.
All that's left now is the ability to campaign freely and end the community party monopoly.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Many forget that Batista was supported by the communists in Cuba and duly elected. The problem was that he couldn't get reelected and formed a coup to stay in power.
Ironically this is why the Cuban electoral process is so quaint. It allows those in power to remain in power indefinitely so that they don't have to have coups. They simply just retain power because the people by law are not allowed to have much ability to choose anyone else.
Had they simply followed the 1940 constitution Cuba would be highly prosperous right now, but it required Batistas ouster since after the coup his hard hand was very Pinochet-esque.
Cuba may have become the Las Vegas of the Americas by now.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)Although he appears to have posted in other threads since he started this OP.
I really dislike drive by OPs.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)maybe that's the reason!
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I must say, Fidel looks pretty good for a guy in a neurovegetative state. Perhaps that phrase actually means "abnormally perky looking senior citizen": http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1594594
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Accusing the rest of us of anti-socialist witch hunts in a thread that wishes *death* on a socialist leader is a level of irony that plunges to new depths. Congratulations. Might want to adjust your aim on the McCarthy ray there, KoKo.
And as a Communist? I find your repeated misuse of that term on DU really offensive. I have comrades that actually had their lives destroyed by that shit. Being hectored on a message board doesn't even rise to hangnail levels of fuss. Please.
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)And, I'm not a Communist, I just actually understand the history of Cuba, and what the OP did.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)I think you have me confused with someone else.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I saw you do it in Meta today and again in here. No, I'm not confused.
brooklynite
(94,679 posts)Whatever approach they take to economics and social policy, I'm not going to shed a tear for a dictator's demise.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)brooklynite
(94,679 posts)...in my case I was in the Philippines, when Ferdinand Marcos declared Martial Law, suspended the Constitution, dissolved the legislature, imposed Government censorship on all forms of media, and ruled by decree for the 25 years.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)here in subtle "step-by-steps" for awhile now.
If you only think this stuff could happen under Marcos...well...I think you've read enough history that you know that Marcos was not unique in world history.
brooklynite
(94,679 posts)The last time I checked, we took control of the House and Senate during Bush II's second term. We also blocked his plan to privatize Social Security.
Whatever you think about Bush's transgressions, he was NOT a Dictator (at least not to anyone who's experienced one).
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Why the everloving heck should any of the rest of us listen to your approach to economics?
brooklynite
(94,679 posts)...it's okay to support someone who denies political rights to others?
I'd be delighted to have you explain the linkage.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)voice to everybody else? Your motives are suspect.
brooklynite
(94,679 posts)The Marcos dictatorship was a crony capitalist system where the wealthy did very well, and was strongly supported by the Nixon and Reagan Administrations. But don't that get in the way of your biases.
JanMichael
(24,890 posts)never reported crap like this. I have heard this silly assed crap before; I doubt you were even there.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)marmar
(77,086 posts)So we can put them in the chains of contemporary corporate capitalism.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Seems some folks on this thread don't understand the difference in what Castro has done and their ideology that can't get over it. He doesn't fit in "the box" they want to put him in.
hack89
(39,171 posts)and a free press? And the right to travel?
Social Democracy works just fine in some European countries.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)upsetting the status quo and giving hope to billions around the world.
That's what I saw. What about you?