General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFate of Roe v. Wade in Texas then beyond
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/08/texas-abortion-supreme-court-roe-wade.html...
it will be open season on Texas abortion providers. Anyone, anywhere, can sue an abettor of any abortion that takes place after six weeks in Texas. Patients themselves are exempted from a suit, but their loved ones, including spouses, are not. Possible targets may include any person who encourages the abortion, including family members of the patient; rape crisis counselors, genetic counselors, and clergy; a friend who drives the patient to a clinic; donors to an abortion fund; and, of course, the clinic staff who facilitate the procedure. Any person who forms an intent to abet the abortion can also be sued, even if they dont follow through on their intentions. All these individuals can be sued for at least $10,000 per abortion in any state court. If they dont defend themselves, the court must automatically rule against them.
...
This is the stuff an anti-abortion jurists dreams are made of. If the high court simply decides not to decide the fate of SB 8, in an unsigned, unreasoned two-sentence order over the summer recess, whos going to pay attention? Texas wants to ban all abortions. The Supreme Court wants Texas to ban all abortions. In the most cynical sense, the decision to do nothing at all here is a win for everyone.
Rachel Maddow just talked about this on her show. It's freakin horrifying.
msongs
(67,371 posts)FBaggins
(26,721 posts)... getting SCOTUS to make such a ruling mere weeks after you bring a lawsuit and no lower court has ruled on it yet.
PlanetBev
(4,104 posts)She uses the most appropriate word to describe this law, dystopian.
Haggard Celine
(16,838 posts)Who wrote that law, Kafka? Just more hypocrisy from the party that wants government out of our lives.
TrogL
(32,818 posts)Now it's reality
Mad_Machine76
(24,396 posts)sue somebody? Unless you're a lawyer or have legal counsel, the average Joe and Jane would not only need to know how to file a lawsuit, but they would have to adjudicate said lawsuit in court, provide evidence, etc., right? This law is awful but the way it's designed to evade legal challenges seems like it would make it near impossible for the average Joe and Jane to successfully file and adjudicate a lawsuit. Am I missing something? Any DU lawyers care to weigh in?
llmart
(15,534 posts)There are private law schools (research Ave Maria Law School in Florida) who's main mission is to train lawyers in how to overturn Roe v Wade. I'm guessing that there are enough wealthy people (Catholics primarily) who, if they'll fund running a law school for that purpose can easily afford to do pro bono legal representation.
Just my take. Ave Maria actually has an entire town in Florida that seems like a creepy enclave of all white, Catholic residents and businesses.
Mad_Machine76
(24,396 posts)probably, though? And non-lawyers are not going be giving up their day jobs to become private litigators? Some people with deep pockets and time on their hands might take this up but it all seems highly impractical. I'm wondering if filling people's heads idea of being sued is meant more simply as a deterrent to getting an abortion/providing abortions
DBoon
(22,340 posts)Manufacture a case they "abetted" a pregnancy termination and make their life pure hell.
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)allowing citizens to sue residents of texas who get prescriptions for Viagra or get a vasectomy. It should shock the bastards into thinking about their own bodily autonomy.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Make sure you DO NOT go to the clinics with TX license plates on the vehicle.
Also cover you head and face so it cannot be seen.
Also make sure when you leave you are not being followed.
These stupid freaks will monitor clinics in other states and try bullshit in TX.