Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,905 posts)
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 01:02 AM Sep 2021

**"In reaching this conclusion," the opinion said,

“we stress that we do not purport to resolve definitively any jurisdictional or substantive claim in the applicants’ lawsuit. In particular, this order is not based on any conclusion about the constitutionality of Texas’ law, and in no way limits other procedurally proper challenges to the Texas law, including in Texas state courts.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/01/us/supreme-court-texas-abortion.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
**"In reaching this conclusion," the opinion said, (Original Post) elleng Sep 2021 OP
The fact that they ignored the ACLU injunction, and didn't block the law from taking effect speaks JohnSJ Sep 2021 #1
It's meaningless garbage from the Trump judges. Roe v. Wade is dead. dalton99a Sep 2021 #2
Did you read the part about qazplm135 Sep 2021 #3

JohnSJ

(92,190 posts)
1. The fact that they ignored the ACLU injunction, and didn't block the law from taking effect speaks
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 01:10 AM
Sep 2021

volumes

qazplm135

(7,447 posts)
3. Did you read the part about
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 01:31 AM
Sep 2021

Needing to show it likely that they would prevail to get an injunction and that they haven't?

You don't let an unconstitutional thing happen for a little bit while you consider it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»**"In reaching this concl...