Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewHendoLib

(60,010 posts)
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 07:44 AM Sep 2021

Slate"There are Two Real Ways to Answer the Texas Abortion Law"

Neither is Easy

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/09/texas-abortion-law-what-to-do.html

Thinking about a nondecision that never came down via the so-called shadow docket in the middle of the night that allowed the second-largest state in the country to overturn a 50-year-old precedent without the Supreme Court writing a word is a bit like dancing between the raindrops. By doing nothing at all on Wednesday night, the Supreme Court largely evaded top-of-the-fold coverage or glaring headlines even as—for all intents and purposes—abortions after six weeks simply stopped in Texas at midnight (and not coincidentally on the day Texas Republicans passed their effort to further minority rule at the ballot box).

It’s easy to be angry at Journalism for failing to prioritize the story. Or at Democrats who control the House, the Senate and the White House for failing to do anything to protect women’s right to choose in Texas. But the problem with covering a thing that didn’t ever exactly happen is that Journalism is largely terrible at it, and the problem with being mad at Democrats is that quite literally the only thing that can be done about a stolen federal judiciary is to reform it. So far, Democrats are a combination of unable or unwilling when it comes to actually reforming the courts. (But don’t worry—there’s a Commission!) Supreme Court conservatives who know this have thus become terrifyingly adept at judging between the raindrops—at deciding life-and-death matters by way of unreasoned orders in the dead of night, based almost entirely on their feelings. They have fully mastered the game of denial and deflection, dressed up as humility and institutionalism.

If you want to be pissed off at someone today, kindly be pissed off at Texas Republicans, who passed a law that evades judicial review by design, and at the judges and activists who delight in its unbearable cleverness. (These are the people who used to say they were just helping women make better decisions but now say women can make no decisions). Be pissed off at the stealing of the federal courts that took place in plain sight, which pissed off plenty of people, but not, apparently, enough people to stop it. Be pissed off at abortion opponents who insisted in public that their justices would never disturb Roe while smirking in private because they knew it would happen within months. And if you want to see someone do something about it, do the only thing that might make a difference and engage in an effort to rebalance the federal courts to be reflective of what voters prefer and the law demands.

snip

Texas has now made abortion impossible for 85 percent of the women in the state—these are real people—and we all are on tenterhooks waiting to see whether and how the Roberts court allows it and justifies it. That isn’t the way the legal system was designed to work at all. The problem with watching jurisprudence unfold as though it’s reality television is that the court does all its work during the commercials. There was nothing that could have been done to stop this particular case if a bunch of Trump judges saw no emergency. There’s no point in spending the day berating one another for failing to pay attention to the thing we didn’t see because it was designed to occur unseen. The game is bigger than this, has always been bigger, because the game is about power, as it has always been. Which means that the only things to do now are work to protect the vote and fix the courts—the boring tedious work that also happens outside the spotlight and beneath the fold. If the systemic machinery of justice isn’t immediately repaired, what happens in the shadows is going to keep catching us off guard, late at night, while we struggle to decide if Roe was overruled this week, or nullified, or merely paused for a few million people. Until the courts do their work in the open, according to the agreed-upon rules of the road, this slow erosion of the rule of law is always going to occur between the raindrops, and we’re going to feel surprised and powerless every single time.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slate"There are Two Real Ways to Answer the Texas Abortion Law" (Original Post) NewHendoLib Sep 2021 OP
it's important to tie all this to voting rights. mopinko Sep 2021 #1
Absolutely. 2naSalit Sep 2021 #2
+1000. nt ecstatic Sep 2021 #4
100% agree! bluestarone Sep 2021 #6
The same two assholes stand in the way of court reform, election restoration, and infrastructure. lagomorph777 Sep 2021 #17
I thinks it's time for Lysistrata. FalloutShelter Sep 2021 #3
the smirky woman I saw on ABC news d_r Sep 2021 #5
Justice died on Roberts watch. Hugin Sep 2021 #7
Better check. I read (somewhere?) Roberts voted with the liberals to stay the Texas law. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #8
You are correct, but leftieNanner Sep 2021 #10
So, what? Hugin Sep 2021 #15
Yes, it did. And he likely knew it would. ancianita Sep 2021 #12
+1 Hugin Sep 2021 #16
Article says one is to fix court. What is the other? (I couldn't see it in scanning) Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #9
It appears to be "the only things to do now are work to protect the vote and fix the courts" muriel_volestrangler Sep 2021 #13
Thanks. Both crucial goals, but the article was not especially enlightening, I think. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #14
Texans want this... anotherOKIE Sep 2021 #11

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
17. The same two assholes stand in the way of court reform, election restoration, and infrastructure.
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 01:14 PM
Sep 2021

They have to be pressured and pressured and pressured until they break.

FalloutShelter

(11,837 posts)
3. I thinks it's time for Lysistrata.
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 08:52 AM
Sep 2021

No justice, no peace. No rights, no nookie. Women across the country could enact this in solidarity with their sisters in Texas.

I am only half kidding.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
5. the smirky woman I saw on ABC news
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 09:41 AM
Sep 2021

who is the leader of the Texas "pro-life" group probably isn't going to follow your lead, nor will the mamas with quiverfull stickers on their minivan windows. Some people are just crazy.

This crazy lady -

leftieNanner

(15,070 posts)
10. You are correct, but
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 10:43 AM
Sep 2021

He knew that the law would be upheld by the five justices, so he could vote with the other three and pretend he's a moderate and reasonable fellow. It's all about making "his" court look sensible.

He still got what he wanted.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,272 posts)
13. It appears to be "the only things to do now are work to protect the vote and fix the courts"
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 12:16 PM
Sep 2021

Nothing more explicit than that, as far as I can see.

anotherOKIE

(90 posts)
11. Texans want this...
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 10:53 AM
Sep 2021

I am pretty sure that there are enough women and liberals in Texas to have prevented this abortion and voting legislation from ever happening. But, either through gerrymandering and/or women just not supporting their own right to decide for themselves this happened. If women wanted to change life in Texas they could do so. I can only assume that, even with gerrymandering, women voted to put those legislators into office.

I can completely support a woman's right to choose. COMPLETELY! Some women care but I don't think all that many really do, despite polls that indicate otherwise. You get what you vote for. It's becoming like the old East Germany where neighbors snitch on each other and secretly work for the oppressive government.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Slate"There are Two Real ...