Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,083 posts)
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 10:55 PM Sep 2021

Some interesting thoughts about the Texas abortion ban...



Tweet text:
Tim Hogan 浩勤
@TimInHonolulu
1. @TheJusticeDept has the power to charge the Texas legislature's members who voted for the bill and charge @GregAbbott_TX who signed it with this statute. 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights.
2:23 PM · Sep 2, 2021


Unrolled thread here
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1433541022710067236.html

1. @TheJusticeDept has the power to charge the Texas legislature's members who voted for the bill and charge @GregAbbott_TX who signed it with this statute. 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights.

2. Simple element analysis:
-Two or more persons;
-Agree
-to unlawful purpose of intimidating women from obtaining healthcare;
-Guaranteed by US Constitution via Roe v. Wade
-Texas legislature & Governor have no statutory immunity from the criminal statute.

Charge them.

3. It is functionally different by only a matter of degree from the Texas legislature passing a law that gives all white Texans the right to shoot Black and Brown people on sight. If you would not charge that you don't belong in the Justice Dept. @WHCOS @PressSec @AnthonyColeyDOJ

4. I think I found the flaw in the Texas law. Not a Texas practitioner so I defer to those who are but Tx civil procedure rule 103 requires a court, sheriff or constable to make service or others who are directed by a public official. Even certified mail is by the clerk.

5. So to commence a suit an official act is necessary. That's the flaw. @TheJusticeDept @CivilRights go to district court and enjoin service of process related to the statute. I did a quick word search in the statute and don't see service of process addressed. @steve_vladeck
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some interesting thoughts about the Texas abortion ban... (Original Post) Nevilledog Sep 2021 OP
Comprehensive reproductive health care covers a women's entire life Claire Oh Nette Sep 2021 #1
They wouldn't know decency I_UndergroundPanther Sep 2021 #2
I hope Decency wears some ball flattening doc martens.... Claire Oh Nette Sep 2021 #3
Steel toe docs I_UndergroundPanther Sep 2021 #4
Well, if that's the case why are there already existing abortion bans after 20 weeks? LeftInTX Sep 2021 #5

Claire Oh Nette

(2,636 posts)
1. Comprehensive reproductive health care covers a women's entire life
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 10:59 PM
Sep 2021

"unlawful purpose of intimidating women from obtaining healthcare;"



It's grossly unconstitutional.

Sorry, old white pervy men. Get out of our pants, ffs. Worry about your own wives' uterii, and no one else's.

Have they no decency?

LeftInTX

(25,274 posts)
5. Well, if that's the case why are there already existing abortion bans after 20 weeks?
Thu Sep 2, 2021, 11:37 PM
Sep 2021

The $10,000 snitching thing is what is illegal and is a violation of 1st amendment rights

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some interesting thoughts...