Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSome interesting thoughts about the Texas abortion ban...
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
Tim Hogan 浩勤
@TimInHonolulu
1. @TheJusticeDept has the power to charge the Texas legislature's members who voted for the bill and charge @GregAbbott_TX who signed it with this statute. 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights.
2:23 PM · Sep 2, 2021
Tim Hogan 浩勤
@TimInHonolulu
1. @TheJusticeDept has the power to charge the Texas legislature's members who voted for the bill and charge @GregAbbott_TX who signed it with this statute. 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights.
2:23 PM · Sep 2, 2021
Unrolled thread here
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1433541022710067236.html
1. @TheJusticeDept has the power to charge the Texas legislature's members who voted for the bill and charge @GregAbbott_TX who signed it with this statute. 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights.
2. Simple element analysis:
-Two or more persons;
-Agree
-to unlawful purpose of intimidating women from obtaining healthcare;
-Guaranteed by US Constitution via Roe v. Wade
-Texas legislature & Governor have no statutory immunity from the criminal statute.
Charge them.
3. It is functionally different by only a matter of degree from the Texas legislature passing a law that gives all white Texans the right to shoot Black and Brown people on sight. If you would not charge that you don't belong in the Justice Dept. @WHCOS @PressSec @AnthonyColeyDOJ
4. I think I found the flaw in the Texas law. Not a Texas practitioner so I defer to those who are but Tx civil procedure rule 103 requires a court, sheriff or constable to make service or others who are directed by a public official. Even certified mail is by the clerk.
5. So to commence a suit an official act is necessary. That's the flaw. @TheJusticeDept @CivilRights go to district court and enjoin service of process related to the statute. I did a quick word search in the statute and don't see service of process addressed. @steve_vladeck
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1092 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some interesting thoughts about the Texas abortion ban... (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Sep 2021
OP
Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)1. Comprehensive reproductive health care covers a women's entire life
"unlawful purpose of intimidating women from obtaining healthcare;"
It's grossly unconstitutional.
Sorry, old white pervy men. Get out of our pants, ffs. Worry about your own wives' uterii, and no one else's.
Have they no decency?
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)2. They wouldn't know decency
If it stomped thier shriveled balls flat.
Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)3. I hope Decency wears some ball flattening doc martens....
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)4. Steel toe docs
LeftInTX
(25,274 posts)5. Well, if that's the case why are there already existing abortion bans after 20 weeks?
The $10,000 snitching thing is what is illegal and is a violation of 1st amendment rights