General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlans for $400-billion new city in the American desert unveiled
CNNNow, he just needs somewhere to build it -- and $400 billion in funding.
The former Walmart executive last week unveiled plans for Telosa, a sustainable metropolis that he hopes to create, from scratch, in the American desert. The ambitious 150,000-acre proposal promises eco-friendly architecture, sustainable energy production and a purportedly drought-resistant water system. A so-called "15-minute city design" will allow residents to access their workplaces, schools and amenities within a quarter-hour commute of their homes.
Although planners are still scouting for locations, possible targets include Nevada, Utah, Idaho, Arizona, Texas and the Appalachian region, according to the project's official website.
The announcement was accompanied by a series of digital renderings by Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG), the architecture firm hired to bring Lore's utopian dream to life. The images show residential buildings covered with greenery and imagined residents enjoying abundant open space. With fossil-fuel-powered vehicles banned in the city, autonomous vehicles are pictured traveling down sun-lit streets alongside scooters and pedestrians.
dsc
(52,160 posts)Also 15 minute commutes in the mountains good luck with that.
ms liberty
(8,573 posts)CanonRay
(14,101 posts)Water. There isn't any.
brush
(53,774 posts)GregariousGroundhog
(7,521 posts)The Trans-Alaska pipeline is 800 miles long and can transport just shy of 90 million gallons of oil per day. If we transport that amount of water, that's 18 gallons per person per day. The actual amount of water transportable would be greater though because water is less viscous than crude oil . Desalinating 500 million gallons of water per day and transporting it 500 miles to Nevada isn't outside the realm of technical feasibility.
The biggest issue is cost. San Diego built a billion dollar desalination plant capable of 50 million gallons per day. It costs them a little over $6 per thousand gallons. I don't know how much piping the water 500 miles would add, but it wouldn't be cheap.
Retrograde
(10,136 posts)Drinking, washing and cooking is at least 5 times that in our current culture
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)calguy
(5,306 posts)brush
(53,774 posts)All those spots in the American dessert are already developed.
Captain Zero
(6,805 posts)nt
maxsolomon
(33,327 posts)#1 place NOT to develop a new city: the desert.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)"Unsinkable" my ass.
hatrack
(59,584 posts)But yeah, sure, let's spend half a trillion of OPM on Dubai West . . . .
luv2fly
(2,475 posts)*snip*
By many measures, Brasilia, the capital city of Brazil, is a miracle. Built from the ground up at breakneck speed between 1956 and 1961, the year it was inaugurated, its filled with beautiful, sculptural, and symbolic buildings by Oscar Niemeyera true master of designand majestic avenues that stretch far as the eye can see.
But by just as many other measures, Brasilia is failing to embody its original ambition as a progressive city that would guarantee a good quality of life to its residents. Its been labeled a cautionary tale for urban dreamers. This backlash against the citys design is what sparked Costas defensive statement.
The problems Brasilia faces today include inequality, congestion, and sprawlwhich are far from unique in this city and common throughout the world. Theyre direct ripple effects of the utopian thinking that went into its design. Its a catch-22: The very things about the city that Brazilians hold near and dear to their hearts are also whats causing many of its challenges.
More at:
https://archive.curbed.com/2019/6/7/18657121/brasilia-brazil-urban-planning-architecture-design
haele
(12,650 posts)A massive service center for teleworking? A ginormous Amazon Warehouse? A Hydrogen Car plant with a hub for supporting parts and development of the infrastructure for hydrogen car refueling? Biotech? A military base, or federal government complex?
A space-port?
Saudi Arabia is planning a similar city, and it's not going well, because there's nothing really that important the city is supposed to be doing.
Cities are formed organically to support major endeavors - and once those endeavors are over, they tend to dissolve (Detroit being an example).
One doesn't just "build a city". China does, but that's because they have to keep their population working. And most of those cities are empty.
I wish him luck finding a major business that employs potentially millions of people to pair his city up with.
Haele
Hugin
(33,135 posts)I didn't realize the show was a docudrama.
niyad
(113,279 posts)displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)Can't you just picture it? Built to Walmart standards.
Rstrstx
(1,399 posts)NickB79
(19,236 posts)Essentially a much larger, but not as closed loop, version of the failed Biodome built in the late 80's.
As for water, they'll have to recycle it to make it work. Hope the citizens are ok knowing they're drinking recycled piss and toilet water.
hunter
(38,311 posts)In some places the high tech recycled water is better than the "naturally" recycled water.
FBaggins
(26,731 posts)Do they have a way to enforce who moves there?
dalton99a
(81,468 posts)Klaralven
(7,510 posts)https://www.archdaily.com/962651/dubai-to-become-the-best-city-in-the-world-by-2050
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)hunter
(38,311 posts)The economy of Singapore is a highly-developed free-market economy. Singapore's economy has been ranked by the World Economic Forum as the most open in the world, the 3rd-least corrupt, and the most pro-business. Singapore has low tax-rates and the second-highest per-capita GDP in the world in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP). The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is headquartered in Singapore.
--more--
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Singapore
But I'm not sure I could live in a place where Ordnung muss sein. I'm much more comfortable in organically grown cities that are a little rough around the edges.
For urban areas water is probably not a huge problem. Urban users can afford to move water long distances, desalinate water, and/or recycle sewage back into potable water. These technologies are already established in many parts of the world. Unfortunately this takes a lot of energy. If this energy is derived from fossil fuels global warming only gets worse.
And very seriously, we all ought to be opposing any new construction on previously undeveloped land. Haven't we trashed enough of the natural environment? Instead of building new stuff out on the desert we could be tearing shit down and restoring trashed landscapes to something resembling a natural state. Even minor increases in the population density of existing cities could comfortably accommodate millions of people who now live in poverty.