General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaybe the Texas abortion and voter restriction laws are a good thing...
I can only imagine the stupor, defiance and anger among the 'sane' people in a way huge swaths of voters will vote those sorry republican asses out ad infinitum.
NJCher
(35,667 posts)IMO.
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I do believe that Republicans really want the issue much more than they want a fix for it or any other issue.
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)The results were dismaying. While learning about youth suppression generally did make people angry, it did not make people more likely to want to vote. (Neither did learning about suppression without an explicitly named target.) Most concerning, information about youth suppression did not even boost voting intentions for young adults themselves the individuals who stood to lose the most.
Oppression of others doesn't motivate turnout
NJCher
(35,667 posts)It is more about collective identity, voter suppression, and actual voting.
It also devotes a good part of its query to the youth vote, which we all know doesnt mean much.
Your post might be of interest if the OP had restricted its topic to the youth vote, but the OP does not do this.
You even post an excerpt from the article that refers to the youth vote but your subject heading tries to make it seem like it refers to all voters which it does not.
What you are doing here is misrepresenting the results of a study and for that, you deserve to be called for being intellectually dishonest.
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)and only saw mention of youth voter turnout. So year a bit misleading.
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)If the answer is no then my point stands using youth as an example
NJCher
(35,667 posts)Do not pretend in any way, shape, or form that you did not mis-read (and I'm being generous with you).
My point does not rest on just women Or just African Americans. It is that you significantly mis-read and misrepresented this research.
Why would you do that? I just don't understand why you would post such research and then mislead others about it?
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)NJCher
(35,667 posts)your question would require me to do a search of academic journals or at least a Google academic search. I'm not doing any research for you. It is incumbent upon you, who is making such a claim, to do such research.
Even if I did take you bait, the chances are you wouldn't understand it, at least based on what I've seen of your claims about research so far.
If you want to make a claim about women's views of themselves in a collectivist context, you go do the research and then you make the claim.
That's the way it's done.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,158 posts)Don't get me wrong, I want to believe in your hypothesis. But find me the pulse of the masses yearning to be free. Reagan framed it as such, FDR tapped the geyser itself, to some extent Trump found an inner hatred that burned brightly in his twisted base. Not much is underground anymore.
We have to forge a coalition of pro-choice pandemic-fighting civil rights climate worriers. Thread the needle with those issues and make them yearn and burn in the chest with kick the bastards out fervor. Women might be the common denominator?
NJCher
(35,667 posts)Might be the key.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)....and fill her with a terrible resolve."