Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
Wed Sep 8, 2021, 02:04 AM Sep 2021

A few questions re Texas law ...

How many women will be seeking abortions when they're not even pregnant, strictly out of fear that they might be, and don't want to miss the six-week window of opportunity?

How many women will be seeking an unnecessary procedure simply because they want to 'play-it-safe, just-in-case'?

This would include not only rape victims, but any woman who is sexually active and doesn't want to risk an unwanted pregnancy going undetected before it's too late to abort.

Are women who don't want to be pregnant supposed to seek an abortion every time they have intercourse - because there's always the possibility that their method of birth control failed, and it's better to be safe than sorry?

How many abortion providers will be inundated by women fearful of an unwanted pregnancy, no matter how slim the chance of an actual pregnancy, while women who actually are pregnant can't get an appointment because that doctor's appointment book is full?

Have any of the whack-jobs who passed this bill even considered the impact of their state's healthcare system being overwhelmed by women having to be reassured by a doctor, repeatedly and on an ongoing basis, that they're NOT pregnant before their six weeks of opportunity have come and gone?

There are thousands of reasons why this law is a recipe for disaster. This is just one of them.




7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A few questions re Texas law ... (Original Post) NanceGreggs Sep 2021 OP
Excellent Questions - Much Concern - No Answers (nt) wyn borkins Sep 2021 #1
This begs a question. Frasier Balzov Sep 2021 #2
Exactly the point. NanceGreggs Sep 2021 #3
There are a couple of givens with respect to making abortion illegal. Hugin Sep 2021 #4
That doesn't make any sense. Make7 Sep 2021 #5
The question doesn't seem to make sense FBaggins Sep 2021 #6
Obviously they'd be tested first. NanceGreggs Sep 2021 #7

Frasier Balzov

(2,646 posts)
2. This begs a question.
Wed Sep 8, 2021, 02:20 AM
Sep 2021

Last edited Wed Sep 8, 2021, 05:17 AM - Edit history (1)

How early is a pregnancy detectable with certitude by a duly qualified medical practitioner?

Somehow I don't think it's ethical to perform an abortion procedure without verifying that it's indicated.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
3. Exactly the point.
Wed Sep 8, 2021, 02:37 AM
Sep 2021

How many women will be seeking an unnecessary procedure - only to be told that the procedure they seek is unnecessary?

And how many hours of medical practitioners' time will be wasted explaining that?

I doubt that any ethical doctor will be performing abortions on women who aren't pregnant.

You seem to believe they will. Why?

Hugin

(33,135 posts)
4. There are a couple of givens with respect to making abortion illegal.
Wed Sep 8, 2021, 02:48 AM
Sep 2021

Which is why Ireland was finally convinced to legalize abortion a few years ago after having a law on the books forever.

1. There are not statistically more abortions, if abortion is legal. (Key finding, which was supported by numerous studies of places where abortion was both legal and illegal.)

2. Significantly fewer pregnant women die. (Another key finding.)

So, the bottom line is, illegal abortions kill more women and have no impact on the total number of abortions attempted. So, making abortions illegal only serves to punish women.

Make7

(8,543 posts)
5. That doesn't make any sense.
Wed Sep 8, 2021, 03:17 AM
Sep 2021
How many women will be seeking abortions when they're not even pregnant, strictly out of fear that they might be, and don't want to miss the six-week window of opportunity?

How many women will be seeking an unnecessary procedure simply because they want to 'play-it-safe, just-in-case'?

Women would be requesting blood pregnancy tests to see if they are pregnant before seeking an abortion. How can you have an abortion if you are not pregnant?

This law is regressive, unfair, and punitive but perhaps arguing about what is actually in it and what burdens that unfairly places on women would be better than advancing some ridiculous hypothetical.

FBaggins

(26,731 posts)
6. The question doesn't seem to make sense
Wed Sep 8, 2021, 04:59 AM
Sep 2021

Why would any woman think to jump to the “I need an abortion” step before “I should test whether I’m pregnant” ?

“Abortion as birth control” is one thing, but “abortion as pregnancy test”?

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
7. Obviously they'd be tested first.
Wed Sep 8, 2021, 09:36 AM
Sep 2021

But how many women would think they might require an abortion, and see a doctor before the six-weeks are up? And what does that do to the healthcare system - not to mention what anxiety the woman has to go through?

Obviously no one can abort a non-pregnancy.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A few questions re Texas ...