General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA few questions re Texas law ...
How many women will be seeking abortions when they're not even pregnant, strictly out of fear that they might be, and don't want to miss the six-week window of opportunity?
How many women will be seeking an unnecessary procedure simply because they want to 'play-it-safe, just-in-case'?
This would include not only rape victims, but any woman who is sexually active and doesn't want to risk an unwanted pregnancy going undetected before it's too late to abort.
Are women who don't want to be pregnant supposed to seek an abortion every time they have intercourse - because there's always the possibility that their method of birth control failed, and it's better to be safe than sorry?
How many abortion providers will be inundated by women fearful of an unwanted pregnancy, no matter how slim the chance of an actual pregnancy, while women who actually are pregnant can't get an appointment because that doctor's appointment book is full?
Have any of the whack-jobs who passed this bill even considered the impact of their state's healthcare system being overwhelmed by women having to be reassured by a doctor, repeatedly and on an ongoing basis, that they're NOT pregnant before their six weeks of opportunity have come and gone?
There are thousands of reasons why this law is a recipe for disaster. This is just one of them.
wyn borkins
(1,109 posts)Frasier Balzov
(2,646 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 8, 2021, 05:17 AM - Edit history (1)
How early is a pregnancy detectable with certitude by a duly qualified medical practitioner?
Somehow I don't think it's ethical to perform an abortion procedure without verifying that it's indicated.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)How many women will be seeking an unnecessary procedure - only to be told that the procedure they seek is unnecessary?
And how many hours of medical practitioners' time will be wasted explaining that?
I doubt that any ethical doctor will be performing abortions on women who aren't pregnant.
You seem to believe they will. Why?
Hugin
(33,135 posts)Which is why Ireland was finally convinced to legalize abortion a few years ago after having a law on the books forever.
1. There are not statistically more abortions, if abortion is legal. (Key finding, which was supported by numerous studies of places where abortion was both legal and illegal.)
2. Significantly fewer pregnant women die. (Another key finding.)
So, the bottom line is, illegal abortions kill more women and have no impact on the total number of abortions attempted. So, making abortions illegal only serves to punish women.
Make7
(8,543 posts)How many women will be seeking an unnecessary procedure simply because they want to 'play-it-safe, just-in-case'?
Women would be requesting blood pregnancy tests to see if they are pregnant before seeking an abortion. How can you have an abortion if you are not pregnant?
This law is regressive, unfair, and punitive but perhaps arguing about what is actually in it and what burdens that unfairly places on women would be better than advancing some ridiculous hypothetical.
FBaggins
(26,731 posts)Why would any woman think to jump to the I need an abortion step before I should test whether Im pregnant ?
Abortion as birth control is one thing, but abortion as pregnancy test?
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)But how many women would think they might require an abortion, and see a doctor before the six-weeks are up? And what does that do to the healthcare system - not to mention what anxiety the woman has to go through?
Obviously no one can abort a non-pregnancy.