General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBalenciaga under fire for 'racist' sweatpant design, accused of appropriating 'sagging'
Looks like even the dumbest fashions of the nineties are making a comeback.
Also $1,190 for sweatpants???? LOL.
https://news.yahoo.com/balenciaga-under-fire-racist-sweatpant-210757426.html
Jaelen Ogadhoh
Sat, September 11, 2021, 5:07 PM·3 min read
The $1,190 sweatpants have caused a stir on social media, with many critics labeling the design as a form of gentrification
Between lofty prices and notoriously unorthodox designs, Balenciaga garments have raised many an eyebrow in the past at times for adverse reasons. Now, critics are calling an item from its recent collection racist.
Among the U.K. fashion brands latest looks for the Fall/Winter 2021 season are sweatpants designed with an exposed boxer short built-in above the waistband, which some have deemed to be an appropriation of the sagging pant style popularized in the 90s by Black people.
?width=990&auto=webp&quality=75
Scrivener7
(50,911 posts)The Unmitigated Gall
(3,779 posts)Blue Owl
(50,259 posts)Bet he thinks he'd look pretty dope in those ridiculous abominations
Yeah, he probably does.
Haggard Celine
(16,834 posts)Wearing those pants would be a fashion crime, but I wouldn't call it racist.
The whole thing with the saggy pants got started in jail. When guys were booked into the jail, their belts were taken away, so their pants sagged and exposed their underwear.
So some of the guys liked that look and they kept letting their pants droop and flashing their underwear, especially if it was an expensive pair of underwear that they wanted to show off.
I guess Balenciaga wanted to give their customers the opportunity to look like Americans who weren't able to evade detection while committing their crimes. And you know what they say about imitation being the sincerest form of flattery!
Goodheart
(5,308 posts)OF COURSE it's not racist.
Bucky
(53,947 posts)But yes, it's an easy concept for people to grasp foolishly and misapply.
I once argued that anyone wearing blue jeans who's not French is cultural appropriation. It's right there in the name: denim comes from "de Nimmes", after the town where the material was first fabricated.
Some idiots believed I was being serious.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)it can only be a joke to the good natured or an insult to others. I could imagine this as an $8 item (discounted from $11) on Amazon, a hopeful offering from a family shop in Bangelore.
BALENCIAGA?!
Haggard Celine
(16,834 posts)Maybe someone might wear it for Halloween. It might be a something comfortable to wear while you're sitting around the house in the winter, but you wouldn't want anyone else to see you wearing it. I'm not the most fashion-conscious person around, but I could design better clothes. How do these designers keep their jobs?
Ms. Toad
(33,992 posts)2. They are off by a decade. I left teaching (at an all black school) in 1989. The style was already popular then.
I've never been able to understand the appeal, let alone that it has hung around this long. There have been other fashions that have come and gone - but this one just keeps hanging on.
Elessar Zappa
(13,909 posts)but youre right that in the young black community it got popular in the late 80s. The prevalence of sagging did go down in around 13 years ago when skinny jeans became all the rage but sagging now seems to be making a comeback somewhat.
Ms. Toad
(33,992 posts)Either a decrease, or a comeback.
Elessar Zappa
(13,909 posts)Where I live its not near as prevelant as it was 20-25 years ago but its making a small comeback here. Personally, I hate the style and wish it would just die. Even when I was in high school (98-02), I never wore my pants that way.
snort
(2,334 posts)onetexan
(13,020 posts)Dont see anything racist about the sweats, just that they look atrocious.
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)The fashion I remember wasn't just a strip of boxer showing, it was the art of wearing pants BELOW the buttocks, with the ass out in flannel and the jeans below that. Artistically, the pants got lower and lower down the thighs, and the closer to the knees, the more hardcore it was. Had to admire the commitment to the style.
This is just ugly and boring, and the fact that it costs a month's rent even in a cheap city is just laughable. Especially since we've been in a pandemic for a year and a half and let's be real, everyone who's privileged enough to work from home is already wearing the Target version of this from the waist down in Zoom meetings.
apnu
(8,749 posts)Thats great. I could buy these sweat pants or pay rent. Hmmmm
tavernier
(12,368 posts)Renew Deal
(81,846 posts)Flannel made a small comeback in the last year. This is about as racist as that.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)and after having worn that hideousness, I'm not really in a place of moral authority to judge contemporary fashion.
But you go right ahead. Sounds virtuous when you do it.
Bucky
(53,947 posts)... that there's a public consensus that this is a cultural appropriation, rather than just a stupid fashion design
The hijacking power some words have over us is impressive, even daunting.
skypilot
(8,851 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 12, 2021, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)
...I hate the fact that someone is calling this an appropriation of black culture. This is not part of black culture. If anything, it is a small part of black YOUTH culture. I am apprehensive even about using the word culture when discussing this. Wearing their pants like this is really just something that SOME black kids do. Frankly, if some white kids want to "appropriate" this crap they are welcome to do so. Maybe black kids will see white kids dressing like this and give it up and then, with any luck, the white kids will follow suit and move on to some other trend.
Bucky
(53,947 posts)Black, Latino, and white kids still do this when they wanna look tough.
It's almost as lame as the middle aged teachers trying to shame them into hiding their underwear with homophobic "prison" jokes.
ecstatic
(32,652 posts)Hopefully this is just manufactured outrage that's limited to one or two people.