Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Wealth Lobby Is Buying Up Democrats to Defeat Biden's Tax Reform
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/09/wealth-lobby-buying-up-democrats-to-kill-bidens-tax-reform.htmlLast week, Democratic senator turned anti-tax lobbyist Heidi Heitkamp, who represented North Dakota for one term before losing in 2018, appeared on CNBC to make a surprisingly emotional appeal against President Bidens plan to close a notorious loophole for the wealthy. The loophole, called stepped-up basis or the angel-of-death loophole, allows capital gains to escape any tax at all as long as the owners pass the asset on to their heirs before they sell it.
Heitkamps thoughts were with the victims of this reform. She did not invoke the tax implications for the handful of extremely wealthy families that have been financing a lobbying effort to preserve their tax advantages, including the group that currently employs her as its public face. Instead, she cited the burden of an imaginary working-class man named Sam.
The scenario that troubled Heitkamp was that Sam, or people like him, would inherit a family-owned cabin that had become extremely valuable and now have to pay tax on the estate. The truck driver lets say truck-driver Sam, who lets say makes $100,000 a year all of a sudden now has a tax that he owes on inheriting that property, she complained.
In fact, the original Democratic proposal allowed for a $1 million exemption per spouse, and it allowed heirs a 15-year period to spread out the payments. So poor Sam would only have to pay tax on whatever value his cabin had over $2 million, which seems like a rather lavish spread for a working-class fellow, and he would have enjoyed a comfortable period over which to make those payments.
Even so, the pleas made by Heitkamp and other moderate Democrats on behalf of the rural petite-bourgeoisie heirs to landowning fortunes exceeding $2 million were felt. Democrats in Congress proposed to raise the exemption to $5 million per spouse. Surely, now that truck drivers inheriting cabins worth less than $10 million would be spared, Heitkamp would have softened her opposition. . . .
Heitkamps thoughts were with the victims of this reform. She did not invoke the tax implications for the handful of extremely wealthy families that have been financing a lobbying effort to preserve their tax advantages, including the group that currently employs her as its public face. Instead, she cited the burden of an imaginary working-class man named Sam.
The scenario that troubled Heitkamp was that Sam, or people like him, would inherit a family-owned cabin that had become extremely valuable and now have to pay tax on the estate. The truck driver lets say truck-driver Sam, who lets say makes $100,000 a year all of a sudden now has a tax that he owes on inheriting that property, she complained.
In fact, the original Democratic proposal allowed for a $1 million exemption per spouse, and it allowed heirs a 15-year period to spread out the payments. So poor Sam would only have to pay tax on whatever value his cabin had over $2 million, which seems like a rather lavish spread for a working-class fellow, and he would have enjoyed a comfortable period over which to make those payments.
Even so, the pleas made by Heitkamp and other moderate Democrats on behalf of the rural petite-bourgeoisie heirs to landowning fortunes exceeding $2 million were felt. Democrats in Congress proposed to raise the exemption to $5 million per spouse. Surely, now that truck drivers inheriting cabins worth less than $10 million would be spared, Heitkamp would have softened her opposition. . . .
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 887 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Wealth Lobby Is Buying Up Democrats to Defeat Biden's Tax Reform (Original Post)
CousinIT
Sep 2021
OP
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)1. She found a new love... $$$
DBoon
(22,340 posts)4. Then Sam should sell the cabin ...
pay the taxes. He would still have a lot of money left over and could afford to buy a cabin in a state with more realistic prices.
In short, I have no sympathy.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)6. Agreed. Nt
jimfields33
(15,705 posts)2. I would imagine a cabin in California would be quite a haul.
However, this particular issue is really getting in the weeds of the bill.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)3. They whine about stuff so far above my paygrade it's ridiculous.
I couldn't make 5 mil in 10 lifetimes. Rich bastards....
brooklynite
(94,386 posts)5. Where is the evidence of "buying up"?
The article says nothing about contributing to targeted Senators.
brooklynite
(94,386 posts)7. It sure is a relief we replaced Senator Heitkamp with a Republican....
...We don't want Democrats like THAT in the Party, right?
(that was sarcasm)