Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:44 AM Sep 2021

Lawrence O'Donnell just reported on MSNBC that Schumer is set to nuke voting filibuster next week!

WOW! This is tremendous. He said that once the GOP blocks moving to debate on the new voting rights legislation next week, Schumer will make a motion to overrule the chair, which, for those of us familiar with senate parliamentary maneuvers realize, is jargon to suspend the 60-vote requirement or have a carve out, whatever. The majority leader announced today that the senate will take the Freedom to Vote bill up early next week, FYI. He was interviewing Sen. Padilla from CA during this who said "what are we reading tea leaves from Joe Manchin, but yes, he understands we need to have filibuster reform for this bill."

I think O'Donnell is a bit too soon on the timeline though. I expect that the moves to nuke the filibuster will come in tandem with the move to raise the debt ceiling, which the Republicans are also threatening to filibuster (of course, since they're bottomless jerks). That's not until early to mid October or later.

If accurate, this is a gigantic step towards saving democracy!!

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawrence O'Donnell just reported on MSNBC that Schumer is set to nuke voting filibuster next week! (Original Post) NewsCenter28 Sep 2021 OP
That will only work if Manchin and Sinema are on board JohnSJ Sep 2021 #1
Padilla indicated that he believes they would be NewsCenter28 Sep 2021 #3
I hope so JohnSJ Sep 2021 #4
I believe Manchin sponsored the bill LeftInTX Sep 2021 #5
Sounds like he's got a week... AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2021 #9
The charged Manchin with finding 10 Reps Johnny2X2X Sep 2021 #19
The only thing they are on board with... diverdownjt Sep 2021 #12
Schumer signaling readiness, hints that he has Manchin and Sinema on board. lagomorph777 Sep 2021 #17
Make it happen. Let's see how Manchin and Sinema play this out. OAITW r.2.0 Sep 2021 #2
If they vote for it won't be because they put democracy ahead of themselves ColinC Sep 2021 #11
Yep. Some sort of deal will be made. Irish_Dem Sep 2021 #14
I have seen multiple constitutional experts say that because this all deals with the Celerity Sep 2021 #6
Well, that confirms my suspicion, Celerity NewsCenter28 Sep 2021 #7
I fully admit that the argument is outside of my area of knowledge (at least in terms of depth of Celerity Sep 2021 #8
What to possibly look for BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #13
There's already a way around the filibuster for the debt ceiling FBaggins Sep 2021 #16
Thank you Leader Schumer! PortTack Sep 2021 #10
No. He didn't FBaggins Sep 2021 #15
Thanks for this ColinC Sep 2021 #18
I'm very skeptical that Schumer has the votes for this Jose Garcia Sep 2021 #20
You still need ALL Democrats to support him. brooklynite Sep 2021 #21

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
3. Padilla indicated that he believes they would be
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:48 AM
Sep 2021

In the interview with LOD, well Manchin anyway. He didn't mention Sinema, who I can't imagine blocking this all on her own.

Johnny2X2X

(19,060 posts)
19. The charged Manchin with finding 10 Reps
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:25 PM
Sep 2021

They made a deal with him it sounds like, take a week to find 10 Reps or come back and nuke the fillabuster next week.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
17. Schumer signaling readiness, hints that he has Manchin and Sinema on board.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 10:06 AM
Sep 2021

Sounds like this is a very specific carve-out, not a total "kill the filibuster." Whatever it takes, we have to get voting rights done.

ColinC

(8,291 posts)
11. If they vote for it won't be because they put democracy ahead of themselves
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 03:37 AM
Sep 2021

It's because the president and Schumer likely made them an alternative deal of some kind that they could not refuse. I'm still skeptical they would ever get on board doing the right thing in this regard, no matter what.

Celerity

(43,333 posts)
6. I have seen multiple constitutional experts say that because this all deals with the
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:51 AM
Sep 2021

Legislative Calendar and not the Executive Calendar (like the 2 previous mini-nukes did) that it is quite possible that if they vote a carve-out for one specific thing (say voting rights), that the entire scope of the filibuster for anything on the Legislative Calendar could possibly be voided.

That would be fantastic, but the experts said that is why Manchin and Sinema are so far steadfast in their refusal for even reform, as that reform may well equal binning it for all Legislative Calendar business.

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
7. Well, that confirms my suspicion, Celerity
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:59 AM
Sep 2021

Senate democratic leadership has decided to do this. My hypothesis and longstanding sneaking suspicion, however, is that Manchin has probably asked that they do this on the debt ceiling, rather than voting rights, which may allow him to sell this to his constituents better. I knew that there was a reason Dems were so insistent on demanding Republican buy-in on the debt ceiling. When McConnell refuses, bam, Schumer nukes the filibuster and uses the legislative calendar argument to nuke it for voting rights as well. Also, this probably helps us to sell our case to the broader public. Brilliant!

Celerity

(43,333 posts)
8. I fully admit that the argument is outside of my area of knowledge (at least in terms of depth of
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 02:02 AM
Sep 2021

knowledge on Senate procedural minutiae)

BumRushDaShow

(128,905 posts)
13. What to possibly look for
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 04:43 AM
Sep 2021

is if Yellen comes out again in the next week to emphasize what can and cannot be done, to stave off a default.

Yellen warns US may hit debt limit in October

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER and ALAN FRAM September 8, 2021


WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is warning Congress that she will run out of maneuvering room to prevent the U.S. from broaching the government’s borrowing limit in October. In a letter to congressional leaders Wednesday, Yellen said that she still could not provide a specific date for when she will be unable to keep the government funded, absent action by Congress to raise the debt limit. “Based on our best and most recent information, the most likely outcome is that cash and extraordinary measures will be exhausted during the month of October,” Yellen wrote. Yellen said recent measures to address the debt limit had enjoyed “broad bipartisan support,” But Republicans have said they will oppose an effort by Democrats to deal with the debt limit by attaching a provision to an emergency budget bill that Congress will need to pass before the start of the budget year on Oct. 1.

That legislation is needed to avoid a government shutdown. Instead, some Republicans have said Democrats should attach a debt limit increase to the $3.5 trillion infrastructure plan that Democrats are hoping to pass without Republican votes, using a process known as “budget reconciliation.” But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday that Democrats will not be putting the debt limit increase in the reconciliation measure. She said Democrats have several “options” for raising the debt ceiling but she did not specify for that they were. She said Democrats supported lifting the borrowing limit under Trump “because it’s the responsible thing to do. I would hope that the Republicans would act in a similarly responsible way.”

(snip)

While Republicans in Congress have often used the debt limit debate to extract budget concessions from Democratic presidents, lawmakers have never failed to raise the debt limit or suspend it to allow the government to keep borrowing. However, in 2011, a budget battle between the Obama administration and Republicans dragged on for so long that the credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s downgraded a portion of Treasury debt from its AAA rating for the first time in history.

“We have learned from past debt limit impasses that waiting until the last minute to suspend or increase the debt limit can cause serious harm to business and and consumer confidence, raise short-term borrowing costs for taxpayers and negatively impact the credit rating of the United States,” Yellen said. “A delay that calls into question the federal government’s ability to meet all of its obligations would likely cause irreparable damage to the U.S. economy and global financial markets,” she said. “I respectfully urge Congress to protect the full faith and credit of the United States by acting as soon as possible.”

https://apnews.com/article/business-janet-yellen-ac00e6452c48fba9a2bd21d9f633e961


The bolded part is what is intriguing.

As a possibility, there are 3 different types of reconciliation that can be used each fiscal year and they can each be used as "standalone" measures OR can be used in a combo of any 2 "types" or using all 3 "types". So it's possible that given the debt ceiling one is one of those "types", it could be a "standalone" OR be included in combo with a different type - i.e., a "revenue" one (taxes), since she is ruling it out a combo of it with the "spending" one (for the Infrastructure).

Of course another possibility is the carve-out mentioned for the filibuster.

FBaggins

(26,731 posts)
16. There's already a way around the filibuster for the debt ceiling
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 10:04 AM
Sep 2021

No reason to create a carveout for that.

FBaggins

(26,731 posts)
15. No. He didn't
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 10:02 AM
Sep 2021

I just watched it again. Here's my transcription:

"So it sounds like Senator Schumer is going to bring this to a vote - watch it get blocked on the 60-vote threshold by Republicans - and then presumably ask for a vote to overrule the chair on that ruling on the 60-vote threshold."

He wasn't "reporting" that it was going to happen. He was speculating in exactly the same way that some have for several months now. There was no indication that either Manchin or Sinema had changed their mind... there was just the argument (which is exactly what Schumer intended by putting the bill forward) that surely this would be enough to convince Manchin that Republicans aren't going to compromise on voting rights... and thus he would have to nix the filibuster (or at least create a carve-out) if he want's it to get passed.

That's really the exact same speculation that Manchin has shot down for months. Perhaps it will work this time, but O'Donnell was not "reporting" on a known shift in the landscape.

ColinC

(8,291 posts)
18. Thanks for this
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:17 PM
Sep 2021

Although I think Schumer just bringing it to a vote is a shift of some kind -maybe not the landscape, but it feels something must have changed for him to be willing to bring it to a vote finally.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawrence O'Donnell just r...