Looks like another Oath Keeper has flipped:

[Kingofalldems]

Link to tweet

[gratuitous]

1. May the court show him all the mercy he would have shown his victims

That goes for all his little buddies from that day.

[Bev54]

2. I wonder if these guys flipping has anything to do with Roger Stone being served a subpoena today?

[zuul]

3. Roger Stone got a subpoena today?

What's he charged with?

[Bev54]

5. IDK, but it is reported he was served a subpoena while he was on air live

for some RW talk show, he said it was a subpoena regarding 1/6, that was all.

[zuul]

9. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

[Carlitos Brigante]

17. Allow me to add a BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! nt

[Bev54]

7. Here is the report

https://www.rawstory.com/roger-stone-lawsuit-insurrection/

[zuul]

10. Thank you!

[malaise]

19. Sweet

He needs to die in prison

[StarfishSaver]

11. No. The two occurrences aren't related

The plea was in a criminal case while the subpoena was for a civil lawsuit.

[Bev54]

13. Oh too bad, maybe on his next live interview, they can serve him with a subpoena for criminal charge

[StarfishSaver]

14. Only witnesses are served subpoenas in criminal cases

If he's a defendant, he would be served with an arrest warrant.

[Bev54]

15. I can live with that

[wnylib]

23. Isn't it possible to subpoena a person of interest

to appear for questioning during an investigation?

[reACTIONary]

24. It depends on what you mean by an investigation...

... if you are thinking of an inquisitional proceeding, like a legislative committee or a grand jury, yes. I don't think that applies to a criminal investigation conducted by law enforcement. They might "bring 'em in for questioning", but that wouldn't be done with a subpoena.

[wnylib]

26. So what happens if, in a criminal investigation,

the person of interest refuses to be brought in for questioning? There has to be some way to proceed with an investigation.

[reACTIONary]

32. Someone other than me would have to answer that...

... but an arrest might be the only solution, outside of a grand jury subpoena. Even if arrested, we actually do have the right to ignore police questions outside of a limited line of inquiry - for instance, asking for identification. You can always say, sorry, my lawyers told me not to say anything, go talk to them.

My understanding is that StarfishSaver is a lawyer, so he might be able to give us more exact information.

[StarfishSaver]

34. There are plenty of other ways to gather evidence - questioning a target isn't the only way

Eyewitnesses and other corroborating witnesses, phone and computer records, travel documents, video, etc.

In fact, interviewing a target is one of the least effective parts of an investigation - and usually only occurs at the end of the process after the other evidence is collected - since they aren't likely to be helpful, if they answer questions at all.

[StarfishSaver]

25. A witness can be subpoenaed but a target of an investigation can't be compelled to testify

[wnylib]

27. "The target can't be compelled to testify"

Does that mean testify under oath? I know that people are protected by the constitution from testifying against themselves under oath. But what about just answering questions in an ongoing investigation, not under oath? Can they be compelled to do that? Cops take people into the station house all the time for questioning. How do they do that?

[StarfishSaver]

28. A target cannot be compelled to answer questions, under oath or otherwise

No one can be required to answer questions if they believe they could incriminate themselves, even if they aren't under oath.

Yes, cops take people to the station for questioning. But they don't have to answer questions and, if they're not under arrest, they don't have to go.

[wnylib]

29. OK. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

[StarfishSaver]

30. Glad to do it.

[reACTIONary]

33. Thanks! nt

[PatSeg]

20. Whoa! Now that gives one something to look forward to!

[Hortensis]

4. He's cut a deal, but on conspiracy charges! Serious charge that means others,

probably at least one higher up, and significant information. The feds don't do deals to be nice.

[StarfishSaver]

12. Say that again, please

[Hortensis]

16. They're attorneys, but relatively high quality ones subject to scrutiny.

I don't imagine they're going after him out out malice. It might require some faith, but I do believe hey have legitimate and honest purposes they'll be able to explain in full in public when the time comes.

[quakerboy]

31. Will believe it when i see results

People stormed the capital with intent to capture or kill elected congresspeople and overthrow the government during the election process.

And so far, its been slaps on the wrist.

[lame54]

6. What was in that oath again?

[634-5789]

8. Jail this traitor anyway.

[Grokenstein]

18. Reading the headline, I thought to myself

"Oh man, is that 'flipped' as in 'rolled over on his homies'? Or 'flipped' as in 'went berserk and murdered a bunch of people'?"

[Beachnutt]

21. But but, he didn't keep his oath to the keepers

🤷‍♂️

[kairos12]

22. Keeper of traitor Oafs.

Bene Dick Awful.