General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSanders: I'm very disappointed in the vote today on prescription drugs ...
I get that the pharmaceutical industry owns the Republican Party and that no Republican voted for this bill, but there is no excuse for every Democrat not supporting it.
The good news is that the full Congress must and will do far better. At a time when the drug companies are charging us by far the highest prices in the world, Congress must demand that Medicare negotiate prices with this extremely greedy and powerful industry.
Year after year, the pharmaceutical industry makes extraordinary profits and provides their CEOs with obscenely high compensation packages.
Meanwhile, one out of five Americans cannot afford the prescriptions their doctors write, and thousands die each year because they lack the money to buy the medicine they need.
The pharmaceutical industry has spent over $4.5 billion on lobbying and campaign contributions over the past 20 years and has hired some 1,200 lobbyists to get Congress to do its bidding. They are the most powerful industry on Capitol Hill.
Nonetheless, the American people are demanding that Congress stand up to them and finally lower the outrageous price of prescription drugs by requiring Medicare to negotiate with the pharmaceutical industry.
Now is the time for Congress to show courage and stand up to the greed of the pharmaceutical industry. The American people will not accept surrender.
Link to tweet
Carlitos Brigante
(26,497 posts)Seriously, why would a Democrat oppose negotiating drug prices?
joetheman
(1,450 posts)Bettie
(16,076 posts)but yeah, that could be the answer.
Donkees
(31,342 posts)Link to tweet
"Big Pharma will spend, do, and say whatever it takes to defeat any legislation that will curb its unilateral power to dictate prices of prescription drugs," David Mitchell, founder of the group Patients for Affordable Drugs Now, said on Tuesday.
In its ad, PhRMA states that the new drug pricing measure would mean politicians would be deciding what "medicines you can and can't get."
"Politicians say they want to negotiate medicine prices in Medicare," the new ad states. "But make no mistake: What politicians mean is they'll decide which medicines you can and can't get."
Tricia Neuman, a Medicare expert at the Kaiser Family Foundation, pushed back on that claim, noting that the legislation in Congress would not allow the government to decide not to cover certain drugs.
"The bill working its way through Congress focuses on drug prices," Neuman wrote in an email. "Theres really nothing in the proposal that would allow the government to decide which medications people on Medicare can get."
Allowing the secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate lower drug prices, the center of Democrats' measures, is extremely popular with voters in polls.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/572397-phrma-launches-7-figure-ad-campaign-against-democrats-drug-pricing-measures
money out of politics would change a lot.
Irish_Dem
(46,564 posts)If candidates didn't need so much money for their campaigns, perhaps they could work for the people, not corporations.
Midnight Writer
(21,717 posts)karynnj
(59,498 posts)I remember watching the Senate during the ACA days and was surprised that both Senators from NJ (where I lived at the time) were nos on things like negotiating drug prices. Why? Sandoz, J&J etc were in NJ.
elleng
(130,757 posts)negotiation between Feds (via FEHB planners) and pharma, we Federal retirees still benefit, and that medicare beneficiaries and others should have the advantage of such negotiations.
https://www.checkbook.org/newhig2/hig.cfm?gclid=Cj0KCQjws4aKBhDPARIsAIWH0JXkTi2TRIAA-aP_6Y09gKxoyGVaGCoVScthE-4RoO2VETxec_6uhwAaAi7LEALw_wcB
https://www.energy.gov/hc/federal-employee-health-benefits-fehb
Reps. Scott Peters (D-Calif.), Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.) and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) oppose drug-pricing changes that would allow Medicare to negotiate lower prices.
Bev54
(10,039 posts)elleng
(130,757 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,568 posts)and got on the contact page and remembered that my district was changed and he isn't my rep anymore. Damn.
elleng
(130,757 posts)but maybe do so anyway?
BigmanPigman
(51,568 posts)I call after hours so I can just leave my message and my name and a zip code in his district like I do when I call all the GQP senators. It works for me, I've done it over 500 times too. I just called after 5 PM and told him (recorded message) that I am disappointed and why I am not happy with this vote. Sometimes there are ways to get around the system if you are determined.
elleng
(130,757 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,568 posts)it makes me feel less frustrated. My meds prices are astronomical (a large portion of my fixed income).
elleng
(130,757 posts)MY meds prices are stable, being a retired Federal employee, and this issue has been pissing me off for YEARS.
Donkees
(31,342 posts)elleng
(130,757 posts)ancianita
(35,947 posts)medicine. They are recession and market proof and grow in spite of price setting in other countries. Come ON, Scott. NO one's buying this.
But your donor list...
https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/scott-peters/contributors?cid=N00033591&cycle=2020
LiberalArkie
(15,703 posts)aocommunalpunch
(4,233 posts)Doing the work of the people. Pathetic.
Bettie
(16,076 posts)corporations are people too. SMH.
Donkees
(31,342 posts)Link to tweet
spanone
(135,795 posts)JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)Bernie is 100% correct once again!
thenelm1
(851 posts)consumers in mass media for, sometimes I think, made-up maladies. It's like if the physicians ain't buying it or prescribing it, let's get the patients to browbeat their docs for the exorbitantly priced "miracle cure" for whatever they think ails them. Generics that accomplish the same thing? No real profit in that. (Wasn't there a time when said advertising wasn't allowed? Visions of bent peckers, umm, I meant peppers...)
ShazzieB
(16,285 posts)Neither are psoriasis, eczema, ibs, migraines, metastatic breadth cancer, or tardive dyskinesia.
Every day, I see ads for drugs to treat all of those maladies, NONE of which are made up. Complain about the drug companies and their ads all you want, but they know exactly what conditions people suffer from and need help with.
The drugs that don't have generics are ones that are so new that no one else is being allowed to make and market generic versions yet. That is why they're so heavily advertised; the makers of those drugs want to sell as much product as they can while they can still control the market and the price. When the generic versions are on the market, the drug makers will be running advertising for newer drugs that they can sell for big bucks. And the cycle goes on and on.
It sucks, a lot, but that doesn't mean there aren't real people with real health conditions that need those drugs to alleviate real suffering. That is actually why big pharma gets away with this stuff: they point to all the real people who benefit from the development of new drugs and claim they have to charge through the nose for drugs to cover the cost of R&D. Of course, what they mean is that they like to charge through the nose for drugs to cover the cost of R&D AND clear massive profits.
The Wizard
(12,536 posts)it must stop. Any government official with an offshore money laundry account should be summarily incarcerated.
DownriverDem
(6,226 posts)of why we need to win more elections/seats. The more votes we have will mean legislation can move forward.