Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,884 posts)
Fri Sep 17, 2021, 08:37 PM Sep 2021

Republicans demanding Blinken impeachment are forgetting one thing -- the Constitution

Secretary of State Antony Blinken testified Wednesday in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about the withdrawal from Afghanistan. He faced tough criticism from several Republican senators as their colleagues in the House reiterated their demands for Blinken's impeachment.

At the end of August, Reps. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) and Andy Harris (R-M.D.) introduced a resolution for impeachment on the floor of the House of Representatives. Norman justified the articles by arguing, "Under the Constitution of the United States of America, the Secretary of State is tasked with informing Congress and American citizens on the conduct of U.S. foreign relations." One small problem. The Constitution says nothing of the sort.

The Constitution mentions the department secretaries once and only once. Article II, Section 2 states that the president "may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices."

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention crafted that phrase very carefully. The president may request the advice, meaning that he or she is not bound to seek advice, nor is he or she obligated to follow that advice. In other words, the president is ultimately responsible for all executive department actions and responsibilities. As President Harry Truman famously said, "the buck stops here."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republicans-demanding-blinken-impeachment-are-forgetting-one-thing-%e2%80%94-the-constitution/ar-AAOyEPC

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans demanding Blinken impeachment are forgetting one thing -- the Constitution (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2021 OP
Apocryphal claims about Teh Constitution are endemic to the GOP's stick-boy fantasy world (nt) Hugh_Lebowski Sep 2021 #1
Not sure what the point of the OP is. former9thward Sep 2021 #2
Not sure that Belknap is a real precedent Klaralven Sep 2021 #3
The House voted to impeach him. former9thward Sep 2021 #4
Since he was never removed from office, there was never a US Supreme Court case Klaralven Sep 2021 #5

former9thward

(31,972 posts)
2. Not sure what the point of the OP is.
Fri Sep 17, 2021, 08:56 PM
Sep 2021

Are they saying Cabinet officials can't be impeached? Not true. William Belknap, Secretary of War was impeached in 1876.

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
3. Not sure that Belknap is a real precedent
Fri Sep 17, 2021, 10:59 PM
Sep 2021

Belknap resigned before impeachment was voted on by the House. The vote in the Senate trial failed, so he was not removed from office.

former9thward

(31,972 posts)
4. The House voted to impeach him.
Fri Sep 17, 2021, 11:26 PM
Sep 2021

Resignation or not. Yes, the Senate trial failed but it failed for Clinton and Trump also. They were still impeached.

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
5. Since he was never removed from office, there was never a US Supreme Court case
Sat Sep 18, 2021, 07:22 AM
Sep 2021

The only way we'll know if impeachment and removal of Cabinet officers by Congress is constitutional is to convict one in the Senate and then have it decided by a case brought before the Supreme Court.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans demanding Bli...